Skip to main content

Efficacy of Machine Learning in Predicting the Kind of Delivery by Cardiotocography

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing – MEDICON 2019 (MEDICON 2019)

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 76))

Abstract

It is well known that the interpretation of cardiotocographic (CTG) signals is still subjective and prone to misinterpretations; as a consequence, there has been an increase of cesarean sections, often not necessary, and initial expectations of significantly reducing perinatal morbidity and mortality have been unattended. Nevertheless, in developed countries, CTG is still the most widely employed prenatal technique for monitoring fetal health; and in many countries it represents a medical report with legal value. To overcome the drawbacks of the visual interpretation, many computerized systems for automatic or semi-automatic analysis of CTG have been developed in the last years. Recently, in order to support the diagnosis process, and to increase the predictive capability of these systems, also other techniques such as artificial neural network, deep learning and machine learning have been introduced. In previous works of the authors, software for automatic CTG analysis has been developed and described in detail. Now, by employing a dataset of features extracted from CTG signals with that software, to enhance its performances, different algorithms, such as J48, Adaboosting, Random Forests and Gradient Boosted Tree, have been tested to predict whether a birth would be a caesarean section or a vaginal delivery. The RF algorithm showed the best performance, since it reached the highest accuracy (87.6%), precision (87.9%) and AUCROC (93.0%). These preliminary results are very satisfying and encouraging; they confirm that to enrich the CTG analysis software with this methodology can help to significantly improve CTG classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Romano, M., Bifulco, P., Ruffo, M., Improta, G., Clemente, F., Cesarelli, M.: Software for computerised analysis of cardiotocographic traces. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 124, 121–137 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ayres-de-Campos, D., Bernardes, J., Garrido, A., Marques-de-Sa, J., Pereira-Leite, L.: SisPorto 2.0: a program for automated analysis of cardiotocograms, J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal. Med. 9(5), 311–318 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Yousif, S.N., Ali, M.M.: Cardiotocography trace pattern evaluation using MATLAB program. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Technology - ICBET 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Parer, J.T., Hamilton, E.F.: Comparison of 5 experts and computer analysis in rule-based fetal heart rate interpretation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 203(5), 451–461 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Georgoulas, G., Stylios, C., Groumpos, P.P.: Integrated approach for classification of cardiotocograms based on independent component analysis and neural networks. In: Proceeding of 11th IEEE Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, 18–20 June 2003, Rodos, Greece (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huang, M.L., Hsu, Y.Y.: Fetal distress prediction using discriminant analysis, decision tree, and artificial neural network. J. Biomed. Sci. Eng. 5, 526–533 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fergus, P., Selvaraj, M., Chalmers, C.: Machine learning ensemble modelling to classify caesarean section and vaginal delivery types using cardiotocography traces. Comput. Biol. Med. 93, 7–16 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Michie, D., Spiegelhalter, D.J., Taylor, C.C.: Machine learning. Neural Stat. Classif. 13 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Magoulas, G.D., Prentza, A.: Machine learning in medical applications. In: Advanced Course on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 300–307. Springer, Heidelberg, July 1999

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel, H.B., Gandhi, S: A review on big data analytics in healthcare using machine learning approaches. In: 2018 2nd International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), pp. 84–90 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Collins, G.S., Mallett, S., Omar, O., Yu, L.M.: Developing risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of methodology and reporting. BMC Med. 9(1), 103 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Romano, M., Faiella, G., Bifulco, P., D’Addio, G., Clemente, F., Cesarelli, M.: Outliers detection and processing in CTG monitoring. In: IFMBE Proceedings Medicon 2013, 25–28 September 2013, Seville, Spain, vol. 41, pp. 651–654 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cesarelli, M., Romano, M., Bifulco, P.: Comparison of short term variability indexes in cardiotocographic foetal monitoring. Comput. Biol. Med. 39(2), 106–118 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Romano, M., Iuppariello, L., Ponsiglione, A.M., Improta, G., Bifulco, P., Cesarelli, M.: Frequency and time domain analysis of foetal heart rate variability with traditional indexes: a critical survey. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2016, 12 (2016). Article ID 9585431

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cesarelli, M., Romano, M., Bifulco, P., Improta, G., D’Addio, G.: An application of symbolic dynamics for FHRV assessment. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 180, 123–127 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cesarelli, M., Romano, M., Bifulco, P., Fedele, F., Bracale, M.: An algorithm for the recovery of fetal heart rate series from CTG data. Comput. Biol. Med. 37(5), 663–669 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Romano, M., D’Addio, G., Clemente, F., Ponsiglione, A.M., Improta, G., Cesarelli, M.: Symbolic dynamic and frequency analysis in foetal monitoring. In: IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMea) Proceedings, pp. 545–548 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lake, D.K., Moorman, J.R., Hanqing, C.: Sample entropy estimation using sampan. PhysioToolkit, open source software for biomedical science and engineering

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fishman, M., Jacono, F.J., Park, S., Jamasebi, R., Thungtong, A., Loparo, K.L., Dick, T.E.: A method for analyzing temporal patterns of variability of a time series from poincare plots. J. Appl. Physiol. 113(2), 297–306 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma, N., Bansal, K.L.: Comparative study of data mining tools. J. Adv. Database Manage. Syst. 2, 35–41 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Romeo, V., Ricciardi, C., Cuocolo, R., et al.: Machine learning analysis of MRI-derived texture features to predict placenta accreta spectrum in patients with placenta previa. Magn. Reson. Imaging (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.017. ISSN 0730-725X

  22. Quinlan, J.R.: Programs for Machine Learning. Elsevier (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 55(1), 119–139 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Friedman, J.: Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 29, 1189–1232 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Kohavi, R.: A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. IJCAI 14(2), 1137–1145 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hossin, M., Sulaiman, M.N.: A review on evaluation metrics for data classification evaluations. Int. J. Data Min. Knowl. Manage. Process 5(2), 1 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cusenza, M., Accardo, A., D’Addio, G., Corbi, G.: Relationship between fractal dimension and power-law exponent of heart rate variability in normal and heart failure subjects. Comput. Cardiol. 37, 935–938 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Georgoulas, G., Stylios, C., Bernades, J., Groumpos, P.: Classification of cardiotocograms using support vector machines. In: Proceedings 10th IFAC Symposium on Large Scale Systems: Theory and Applications – LSS 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Krupa, N., Ali, M., Zahedi, E., Ahmed, S., Hassan, F.M.: Antepartum fetal heart rate feature extraction and classification using empirical mode decomposition and support vector machine. Biomed. Eng. Online 10(1), 6 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cömert, Z., Kocamaz, A.F.: A study based on gray level co-occurrence matrix and neural network community for determination of hypoxic fetuses. In: International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium – IDAP, pp. 569–573 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Improta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

The authors declare they have no conflict of interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Improta, G., Ricciardi, C., Amato, F., D’Addio, G., Cesarelli, M., Romano, M. (2020). Efficacy of Machine Learning in Predicting the Kind of Delivery by Cardiotocography. In: Henriques, J., Neves, N., de Carvalho, P. (eds) XV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing – MEDICON 2019. MEDICON 2019. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 76. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31635-8_95

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31635-8_95

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31634-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31635-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics