Skip to main content

Classification of Patients with Parkinson’s Disease Using Medical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence Algorithms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing – MEDICON 2019 (MEDICON 2019)

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 76))

Abstract

The diagnosis of Parkinsonian Syndromes (PS) at early-stages is a challenge. PS usually present similar symptoms, and the diagnosis is mainly clinical, causing often misdiagnosis between PS and other movement disorders. Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is the most common PS, affecting a large part of the worldwide population. Medical imaging such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) are currently being used to detect changes in anatomy and in the dopaminergic system, respectively. SPECT imaging allowed to find a group of patients diagnosed as having PD but without the characteristic decreased uptake of a dopamine analogue, so called “Scans Without Evidence of Dopaminergic Deficit” (SWEDD). Nowadays, deep learning algorithms, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), are becoming a useful tool in the medical field to detect patterns relevant to diseases in images. This study proposed an approach using CNN for the classification of MRI and SPECT images from PD, SWEDD, and Control subjects, to identify regions-of-interest related to PD. The proposed model achieved an accuracy of 97.4% using MRI images encompassing the mesencephalon and 93.3% with SPECT slices encompassing the basal ganglia. The results suggest that CNN was able to discriminate Control vs. PD and PD vs. SWEDD, CNN achieved accuracies up to 65.7%. Regarding PD vs. SWEDD, this classification obtained an accuracy of 73.3% using MRI images encompassing the mesencephalon and 93.3% with SPECT slices embracing the basal ganglia. The results suggest that CNN was able to discrimination Control vs. PD and PD vs. SWEDD, but not Control vs. SWEDD supporting the fact that SWEDD patients do not show evidence of dopamine deficit. In addition, the classification allowed the identification of the images comprising the mesencephalon or the basal ganglia as the most relevant for the classification.

Research supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) under the projects UID/BIO/00645/2019, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016428 and NVIDIA GPU grant program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saeed, U., et al.: Imaging biomarkers in Parkinson’s disease and Parkinsonian syndromes: current and emerging concepts. Transl. Neurodegener. 6, 1–25 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Olanow, C.W., Schapira, A.H.V., Obeso, J.A.: Parkinson’s disease and other movement disorders. In: Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 19th edn., pp. 2609–2626. McGraw-Hill Education, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization. Neurological disorders: public health challenges, Genebra, Switzerland, pp. 140–150 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Salvatore, C., et al.: Machine learning on brain MRI data for differential diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy. J. Neurosci. Methods 222, 230–237 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kwon, D.-H., et al.: Seven-tesla magnetic resonance images of the substantia nigra in Parkinson disease. Ann. Neurol. 71(2), 267–277 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pitcher, T.L., et al.: Reduced striatal volumes in Parkinson’s disease: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Transl. Neurodegener. 1(1), 17 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beyer, M.K., et al.: A magnetic resonance imaging study of patients with Parkinson’s disease with mild cognitive impairment and dementia using voxel-based morphometry. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 78(3), 254–259 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tessa, C., et al.: Progression of brain atrophy in the early stages of Parkinson’s disease: A longitudinal tensor-based morphometry study in de novo patients without cognitive impairment. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35(8), 3932–3944 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brooks, D.J.: Imaging Approaches to Parkinson Disease. J. Nucl. Med. 51(4), 596–609 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eidelberg, D.: Imaging in Parkinson’s disease, pp. 3–8. Oxford University Press, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nicastro, N., Garibotto, V., Badoud, S., Burkhard, P.R.: Scan without evidence of dopaminergic deficit: a 10-year retrospective study. Park. Relat. Disord. 31, 53–58 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Erro, R., Schneider, S.A., Stamelou, M.: What do patients with scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit (SWEDD) have? New evidence and continuing controversies. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 87(3), 319–323 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Choi, H., Ha, S., Im, H.J.: Refining diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease with deep learning-based interpretation of dopamine transporter imaging. NeuroImage Clin. 16(September), 586–594 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Batla, A.: Patients with scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit: a long-term follow-up study. Mov. Disord. 29(14), 1820–1825 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schneider, S.A.: Patients with adult-onset dystonic tremor resembling Parkinsonian tremor have scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit (SWEDDs). Mov. Disord. 22(15), 2210–2215 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamet, P., Tremblay, J.: Artificial intelligence in medicine. Metabolism 69, S36–S40 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, J.G., et al.: Deep learning in medical imaging: general overview. Korean J. Radiol. 18(4), 570–584 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oliveira, F.P.M., Castelo-Branco, M.: Computer-aided diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease based on [123 I]FP-CIT SPECT binding potential images, using the voxels-as-features approach and support vector machines. J. Neural Eng. 12(2), 026008 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Prashanth, R., Dutta Roy, S., Mandal, P.K., Ghosh, S.: Automatic classification and prediction models for early Parkinson’s disease diagnosis from SPECT imaging. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(7), 3333–3342 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Singh, G., Samavedham, L.: Unsupervised learning based feature extraction for differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases: a case study on early-stage diagnosis of Parkinson disease. J. Neurosci. Methods 256, 30–40 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Amoroso, N., La Rocca, M., Monaco, A., Bellotti, R., Tangaro, S.: Complex networks reveal early MRI markers of Parkinson’s disease. Med. Image Anal. 48, 12–24 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Esmaeilzadeh, S., Yang, Y., Adeli, E.: End-to-end parkinson disease diagnosis using brain MR-Images by 3D-CNN. CoRR, vol. abs/1806.05233, August 2018

    Google Scholar 

  23. Martinez-Murcia, F.J., et al.: A 3D convolutional neural network approach for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics). LNCS, vol. 10337, pp. 324–333, June 2017

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fearnley, M., Lees, A.J.: Ageing and Parkinson’s disease: substantia nigra regional selectivity. Brain 114(Pt 5), 2283–2301 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Marek, K.: The Parkinson Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI). Prog. Neurobiol. 95(4), 629–635 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Parkinson’s disease in adults. (NICE Guideline NG71) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative. MRI - Technical Operations Manual. PPMI (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Weave, K.F.: An Introduction to Statistical Analysis in Research. Wiley, Hoboken (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Friston, K.J.: Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images. Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jäger, F., Balda, M., Hornegger, J.: Correction of intensity inhomogeneities utilizing histogram-based regularization. In: 4th Russian Conference on Biomedical Engineering 2014, pp. 23–27, March 2008

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dubois, E., Mitiche, A.: Digital picture Processing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 30(4), 694–695 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Marek, K., et al.: The Parkinson’s progression markers initiative (PPMI) – establishing a PD biomarker cohort. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 5(12), 1460–1477 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zuiderveld, K.: Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization. In: Heckbert, P.S. (ed.) Graphics Gems IV, pp. 474–485. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Godinho, D.M.: Desenvolvimento de uma aplicação com recurso à unidade de processamento gráfico para classificação de sinais de Perturbações do Espectro do Autismo. M.S. thesis, Dept. Phys, Univ. Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., Haffner, P.: Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE, 86(11), 2278–2324 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jia, Y., et al.: Caffe: convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia - MM 2014, pp. 675–678 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  37. LeCun, Y.A., Bottou, L., Orr, G.B., Müller, K.-R.: Efficient BackProp, pp. 9–48. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Williams, D.R., Litvan, I.: Parkinsonian syndromes. Contin. Lifelong Learn. Neurol. 19(5), 1189–1212 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. McHugh, M.L.: Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem. Medica 22(3), 276–282 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Bajaj, N.: SWEDD for the general neurologist. Adv. Clin. Neurosci. Rehabil. 10(4), 30–31 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hajian-Tilaki, K.: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for medical diagnostic test evaluation. Casp. J. Intern. Med. 4(2), 627–635 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Minati, L., et al.: Imaging degeneration of the substantia nigra in Parkinson disease with inversion-recovery MR imaging. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 28(2), 309–313 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rahmim, A., et al.: Application of texture analysis to DAT SPECT imaging: relationship to clinical assessments. NeuroImage Clin. 12, e1–e9 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Longadge, R., Dongre, S.: class imbalance problem in data mining review. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 24(1), e256 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cheng, H.-C., Ulane, C.M., Burke, R.E.: Clinical progression in Parkinson disease and the neurobiology of axons. Ann. Neurol. 67(6), 715–725 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Despotović, I., Goossens, B., Philips, W.: MRI segmentation of the human brain: challenges, methods, and applications. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2015, 1–23 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the financial support from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) under the project UID/BIO/00645/2019, Programa Operacional Temático Competitividade e Internacionalização under the project POCI- 01-0145-FEDER-016428, to the NVIDIA GPU Grant Program and to work by PPMI personnel that went into accumulating the data, as well as funding of the study. PPMI – a public-private partnership – is funded by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research and industry partners: Abbvie, Allergan, Avid, Biogen, BioLegend, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Denali, GE Healthcare, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Lundbeck, Merck, Meso Scale Discovery, Pfizer, Piramal, Prevail Therapeutics, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Servier, Takeda, Teva, Ucb, Verily, Voyager Therapeutics and Golub Capital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helena R. Pereira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pereira, H.R., Ferreira, H.A. (2020). Classification of Patients with Parkinson’s Disease Using Medical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence Algorithms. In: Henriques, J., Neves, N., de Carvalho, P. (eds) XV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing – MEDICON 2019. MEDICON 2019. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 76. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31635-8_241

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31635-8_241

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31634-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31635-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics