Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Integral Method of Hazard and Risk Assessment for the Production Facilities Operations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Reliability Analysis and its Applications

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering ((RELIABILITY))

Abstract

Effective management of Hazardous Production Facilities (HPF), forecasting of deviations from nominal modes, prevention of failures, incidents and accidents is possible only on the basis of collecting and analysis of continuous flow of information on condition of HPF and also knowledge of processes complex happening at it (technological, organizational, behavioural and so forth). In the article problems of creation of integrated index within development of control methods of HPF industrial safety condition are designated and the problem of such objects management modelling because of precedents, based on classes of states is solved (there is an event/there is no event). The indicators describing conditions of industrial safety (in fact—risks factors) are offered to consider as signs of assessed situation. Assessments of analyzed states values of integrated index deviations are used. The offered approach to integration of methods of “data mining”, conclusion based on precedents and adaptive management in consistent self-training advising system allows providing management of HPF safety and similar objects with weak formalizable behaviour. Based on a certain measure of proximity in capacity of which it is offered to use Hamming distance, one of similar precedents is chosen. The offered approach, using a method of support vectors, solves this problem according to precedents in the past. A solver (auditor, qualifier, or recognizer) always keeps the found order until essential key signs on which partial order is formed are rejected. Examples of integrated index creation are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Electronic resource. Access mode: www.safety.ru/danger-analyse/#/.

  2. 2.

    ibid.

References

  1. Allford L (2009) Process safety indicators. Saf Sci 47(4):466

    Google Scholar 

  2. Swuste P, C Gulijk, W Zwaard (2010) Safety metaphors and theories a review of the occupational safety literature of the US UK and the Netherlands, till the first part of the 20th century. Saf Sci 48:1000–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Swuste P, van Gulijk C, Zwaard W, Oostendorp Y (2014) Occupational safety theories, models and metaphors in the three decades since WO II, in the United States, Britain and the Netherlands: a literature review. Saf Sci 62:16–27

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Gulijk C, Swuste P, Zwaard W (2009) Developments in safety science during the interbellum period, and Heinrichs contribution. J Appl Occup Sci 22(3):80–95

    Google Scholar 

  5. ANSI/API (2010) Process Safety performance indicators for the refining and petro-chemical Industries, first ed. ANSI/API RP 754

    Google Scholar 

  6. CCPS (2010) Guidance for process safety metrics. AIChE, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  7. OGP (2011) Process safety, recommended practice on key performance indicators. Report nr 456, November, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. HSE (2006) Process safety indicators, a step-by-step guide for the chemical and major hazards industries, HSG 254. The Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, Kew, Richmond, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hopkins A (2007) Thinking about process safety indicators. In: Oil and gas industry conference paper 53. Manchester, November

    Google Scholar 

  10. UK Oil and Gas Industry (2012) Step change in safety, leading performance indicators, guidance for effective use (Aberdeen)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dombi J (1982) Basic concepts for a theory of evaluation: the aggregative operator. Eur J Oper Res 10(3):282–293

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Walker W (1981) Rankings and ranking functions. Can J Math 23:395–399

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Wittmuss A (1985) Scalarizing multiobjective optimization problems. Math Res 27:255–258

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith A (1976) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, vol I. Oxford, pp. 44–46

    Google Scholar 

  15. Swuste P, Theunissen J, Schmitz P, Reniers G, Blokland P (2016) Process safety indicators, a review of literature. J Loss Prev Process Ind 40:162–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.12.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gumerov R (2016) Methodological problems of measurement and assessment of condition of national production security. Economist 4:33–41

    Google Scholar 

  17. Landrini G (2009) Integrated levels of safety according to IEC standards 61508 and 61511 and analysis of their connection with technologic operation [Electronic resource]. Modern technologies of automation, no 1, pp 72–78

    Google Scholar 

  18. Karpov L, Yudin V (2007) Adaptive management on precedents based on classification of conditions of operated objects [Electronic resource]. Works of System Programming Institute of RAS (electronic magazine), vol 13, no 2, pp 37–58

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barsukov A, Bykov A, Lesnykh V (2008) Creation of a System of Emergency and Crisis Situation Indicators and Indexes at UGSS’s facilities. Promyshlennaia i ekologicheskaia bezopasnost obieektov gazovoi promyshlennosti [Industrial and environmental safety of gas industry facilities]. Collection of Research Papers. Moscow, VNIIGAZ LLC, pp 76–86 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Barsukov A, Bochkov A, Lesnykh V (2015) Situation centers. Monitoring, forecasting and management of crisis events in the gas industry. Part 1: monitoring and forecasting. Moscow, NIIgazekonomika, SAM Poligrafist LLC, 596 p (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pereverzev-Orlov V (1990) Specialist’s guide. Experience of development of partner system. M. Science (Nauka), 133 pp

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bochkov A, Zhigirev N (2017) About some applied problems of safety and situational management of the unified gas supply system on the basis of assessed data flow analysis with support vector machine. gas science guide: scientific and technical collection/Gazprom VNIIGAZ LLC, no 1 (29). Increase in reliability and safety of gas industry objects, 278 pp, pp 129–141

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bochkov A, Ponomarenko D (2017) Scientific and methodical bases of monitoring and forecasting of production safety condition of PJSC «Gazprom». Gas Ind 3(749):20–30

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bochkov AV, Lesnykh VV, Ponomarenko DV (2018) Modern approaches to monitoring the state of industrial safety of hazardous production facilities. Problems Risk Anal 15(1):6–17

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bochkov AV (2016) Methodological issues of security of critical infrastructure of structurally complex systems. In: Proceedings 7th DQM international conference life circle engineering and management ICDQM-2016, 29–30 June 2016, Prijevor, Serbia; Čačak. XIII, 543, pp 43–71

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bochkov AV (2016) Development of an integrated approach to risk management of critical infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the international scientific School of IADB (P.-Pb., 25–28.10.2016). GUAP, St. Petersburg, pp 87–96

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bochkov AV, Zhigirev NN, Lesnykh VV (2014) AHP modification for decision making under uncertainty. In: International symposium of the analytical hierarchy process, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bochkov AV, Gigiri NN (2015) The development of methods of comparison of alternatives when making decisions in conditions of incomplete definiteness of the expert’s preferences. In: Proceedings of international scientific school IADB-2015 (S.-Pb., 17–19.11.2015)/SPb. GUAP 2015, 304, pp 224–232

    Google Scholar 

  29. The order of Rostekhnadzor of 12.01.2015 No. 1 «About modification of Federal regulations and rules in the field of industrial safety “Safety Rules in the Oil and Gas Industry”»

    Google Scholar 

  30. Federal norms and rules in the field of industrial safety “Safety Rules in the Oil and Gas Industry”

    Google Scholar 

  31. Federal law “On industrial safety of hazardous production facilities” dated 21.07.1997, № 116-FZ

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gumerov R (2016) Methodological problems of measurement and assessment of the state of national industrial safety [Electronic resource]. Economist 4:33–41. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18853513. Date accessed 22.02.2018

  33. Landrini G (2009) Integrated safety levels in accordance with IEC 61508 and 61511 standards and analysis of their connection with technological maintenance [Electronic resource]. Modern automation technologies, № 1, pp 72–78. https://www.cta.ru/cms/f/382073.pdf. Date accessed 22.02.2018

  34. Bochkov AV, Demidova NS, Bashkin VN (2012) Mathematical modeling of transport processes in life support and human protection systems in extreme environmental conditions. A series of “gas to conduct science.” Monograph—Gazprom VNIIGAZ, Moscow, 282 p

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pontryagin LS, Boltyansky VG, Gamkrelidze RV, Mishchenko EF (1961) Mathematical theory of optimal processes. Fizmatgiz, Moscow, 392 p

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wiener N (1983) Cybernetics, or control and communication in animal and machine. Under the editorship of G. N. Povarova, 2nd ed. Science, Moscow, 344 p

    Google Scholar 

  37. Popov EP (1989) Theory of linear systems of automatic regulation and control. In: Proceeding textbook for technical colleges, 2nd ed, pererab. I DOP. M.: Science. GL. ed. Fiz. Mat. lit., 304 p

    Google Scholar 

  38. Romanovsky YM, Stepanova N, Chernavsky DS (1984) Mathematical biophysics. M., 304 p

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang MC, Uhlenbeck GE (1945) On the theory of Brownian motion II. Rev Mod Phys 17:323–342

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Bogolyubov NN, Krylov NM (1939) On Fokker-Planck equations, which are derived in the perturbation theory by the method based on the spectral properties of the perturbed Hamiltonian. Notes of the Department of mathematical physics Of the Institute of nonlinear mechanics of the USSR Academy of Sciences, vol 4, pp 5–80

    Google Scholar 

  41. Arnold VI (1983) Theory of catastrophes. 2nd ed Izd., DOP. M.: Moscow state University Publ., 80 p (New ideas in natural science)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wiener N (2002) Cybernetics and society. M.: Tidex Ko, p 184

    Google Scholar 

  43. Remizov AN, Maksina AG. et al (2003) Medical and biological physics. 4th ed, DOP. And Pererab. M.: bustard, 560 p. ISBN: 5-7107-9844-4

    Google Scholar 

  44. Leonov AA, Leonova MA, Fedoseev YN (2000) The synthesis of a neural network to solve the problem of identifying the state of the object. In: Reports of the all-Russian conference “Neuroinformatics-99”, Part 1. M.: MEPhI, pp 100–109

    Google Scholar 

  45. Segal IH, Ivanova AP (2003) Introduction to applied discrete programming. In: Models and computational algorithms. M.: Fizmatlit, 204 p

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LLC “Gazprom Gaznadzor”, Moscow, 117418, Russia

    Alexander Bochkov

Authors
  1. Alexander Bochkov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Bochkov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India

    Mangey Ram

  2. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA

    Hoang Pham

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bochkov, A. (2020). The Integral Method of Hazard and Risk Assessment for the Production Facilities Operations. In: Ram, M., Pham, H. (eds) Advances in Reliability Analysis and its Applications. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31375-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31375-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31374-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31375-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation