Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Researching Participatory Modeling Sessions: An Experimental Study on the Influence of Evaluation Potential and the Opportunity to Draw Oneself

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 365))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper deals with the question of how participatory enterprise modeling sessions should be implemented such that participants feel that they own and identify themselves with the models. We present an experiment about the following conditions: (1) the participants were either asked to draw the model themselves or a tool operator took on that task, and (2) the participants were either introduced to a secretary keeping a protocol of their individual contributions or they were not. Our results indicate that neither participation nor the feeling that the model is “mine” is influenced by the conditions. However, participants who did not model themselves showed higher identification with the model. The study gives hint that we should not overestimate the value of stakeholders physically modeling themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atakan, S.S., Bagozzi, R.P., Yoon, C.: Consumer participation in the design and realization stages of production: how self-production shapes consumer evaluations and relationships to products. Int. J. Res. Mark. 31(4), 395–408 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atakan, S.S., Bagozzi, R.P., Yoon, C.: Make it your own: how process valence and self-construal affect evaluation of self-made products. Psychol. Mark. 31(6), 451–468 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Avey, J.B., Avolio, B.J., Crossley, C.D., Luthans, F.: Psychological ownership: theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. J. Organ. Behav.: Int. J. Ind. Occup. Organ. Psychol. Behav. 30(2), 173–191 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baer, M., Brown, G.: Blind in one eye: how psychological ownership of ideas affects the types of suggestions people adopt. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 118(1), 60–71 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bagozzi, R.P., Dholakia, U.M.: Antecedents and purchase consequences of customer participation in small group brand communities. Int. J. Res. Mark. 23(1), 45–61 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.01.005. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016781160600005X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Basheri, M., Burd, L., Baghaei, N.: A multi-touch interface for enhancing collaborative UML diagramming. In: Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, OzCHI 2012, pp. 30–33. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2414536.2414541

  7. Belk, R.W.: Possessions and the extended self. J. Consum. Res. 15(2), 139–168 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergami, M., Bagozzi, R.P.: Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 39(4), 555–577 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown, G., Pierce, J.L., Crossley, C.: Toward an understanding of the development of ownership feelings. J. Organ. Behav. 35(3), 318–338 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown, G., Zhu, H.: my workspace, not yours: the impact of psychological ownership and territoriality in organizations. J. Environ. Psychol. 48, 54–64 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Buisine, S., Besacier, G., Aoussat, A., Vernier, F.: How do interactive tabletop systems influence collaboration? Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(1), 49–59 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Halton, E.: The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. van Dick, R.: Commitment und Identifikation mit Organisationen. Hogrefe Verlag (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Drewes, S., Schultze, T., Schulz-Hardt, S.: Sozialpsychologie - Interaktion und Gruppe, chap. Leistung in Gruppen, pp. 221–244. Hogrefe Verlag, Gttingen (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gutschmidt, A.: Empirical insights into the appraisal of tool support for participative enterprise modeling. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Enterprise Modeling and Information Systems Architectures, Rostock, Germany, 24–25 May 2018, pp. 70–74 (2018). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2097/paper12.pdf

  16. Gutschmidt, A.: On the influence of tools on collaboration in participative enterprise modeling—an experimental comparison between whiteboard and multi-touch table. In: Andersson, B., Johansson, B., Barry, C., Lang, M., Linger, H., Schneider, C. (eds.) Advances in Information Systems Development. LNISO, vol. 34, pp. 151–168. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22993-1_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Harkins, S.G., Jackson, J.M.: The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 11(4), 457–465 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Harkins, S.G., Szymanski, K.: Social loafing and self-evaluation with an objective standard. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 24(4), 354–365 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. James, W.: The Principles of Psychology. Read Books Limited, New York (2013). No. Bd. 1

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jonas, K.W.: Sozialpsychologie. Springer-Lehrbuch, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Karau, S.J., Williams, K.D.: Social loafing: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65(4), 681 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kleine III, R.E., Kleine, S.S., Kernan, J.B.: Mundane consumption and the self: a social-identity perspective. J. Consum. Psychol. 2(3), 209–235 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kwon, S., Ha, S., Kowal, C.: How online self-customization creates identification: antecedents and consequences of consumer-customized product identification and the role of product involvement. Comput. Hum. Behav. 75, 1–13 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Martins, E.: Psychological Ownership in Organisationen: Explorative Untersuchung der Antezedenzen und des Entstehungsprozesses. Rainer Hampp Verlag (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mayhew, M.G., Ashkanasy, N.M., Bramble, T., Gardner, J.: A study of the antecedents and consequences of psychological ownership in organizational settings. J. Soc. Psychol. 147(5), 477–500 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Meyer, J.P., Herscovitch, L.: Commitment in the workplace: toward a general model. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 11(3), 299–326 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Odriscoll, M.P., Pierce, J.L., Coghlan, A.M.: The psychology of ownership: work environment structure, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Group Organ. Manag. 31(3), 388–416 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pierce, J.L., Jussila, I.: Collective psychological ownership within the work and organizational context: construct introduction and elaboration. J. Organ. Behav. 31(6), 810–834 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pierce, J.L., Jussila, I.: Psychological Ownership and the Organizational Context: Theory, Research Evidence, and Application. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Pierce, J.L., Kostova, T., Dirks, K.T.: Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26(2), 298–310 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pierce, J.L., Kostova, T., Dirks, K.T.: The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 7(1), 84–107 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rogers, Y., Lim, Y.K., Hazlewood, W.R., Marshall, P.: Equal opportunities: do shareable interfaces promote more group participation than single user displays? Hum. Comput. Interact. 24(12), 79–116 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/07370020902739379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sandkuhl, K., Wißotzki, M., Stirna, J.: Unternehmensmodellierung: Grundlagen. Methode und Praktiken. Xpert.press, Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Sartre, J.: Das Sein und das Nichts: Versuch einer phänomenologischen Ontologie. Philosophische Schriften]: [Gesammelte Werke in Einzelausgaben, Rowohlt (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shamir, B., Kark, R.: A single-item graphic scale for the measurement of organizational identification. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 77(1), 115–123 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915946. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1348/096317904322915946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stirna, J., Persson, A., Sandkuhl, K.: Participative enterprise modeling: experiences and recommendations. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 546–560. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72988-4_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Van Dyne, L., Pierce, J.L.: Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. J. Organ. Behav. Int. J. Ind. Occup. Organ. Psychol. Behav. 25(4), 439–459 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vandewalle, D., Van Dyne, L., Kostova, T.: Psychological ownership: an empirical examination of its consequences. Group Organ. Manag. 20(2), 210–226 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Williams, K., Harkins, S.G., Latané, B.: Identifiability as a deterrant to social loafing: two cheering experiments. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 40(2), 303 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A., Sloetjes, H.: Elan: a professional framework for multimodality research. In: 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006), pp. 1556–1559 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science Department, University of Rostock, 18059, Rostock, Germany

    Anne Gutschmidt, Valentina Sauer, Marvin Schönwälder & Tom Szilagyi

Authors
  1. Anne Gutschmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Valentina Sauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marvin Schönwälder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tom Szilagyi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Gutschmidt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Economics in Katowice, Katowice, Poland

    Małgorzata Pańkowska

  2. University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany

    Kurt Sandkuhl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gutschmidt, A., Sauer, V., Schönwälder, M., Szilagyi, T. (2019). Researching Participatory Modeling Sessions: An Experimental Study on the Influence of Evaluation Potential and the Opportunity to Draw Oneself. In: Pańkowska, M., Sandkuhl, K. (eds) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. BIR 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 365. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31143-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31143-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31142-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31143-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation