Skip to main content

Uncovering the Semantics of Wikipedia Categories

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Semantic Web – ISWC 2019 (ISWC 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11778))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The Wikipedia category graph serves as the taxonomic backbone for large-scale knowledge graphs like YAGO or Probase, and has been used extensively for tasks like entity disambiguation or semantic similarity estimation. Wikipedia’s categories are a rich source of taxonomic as well as non-taxonomic information. The category German science fiction writers, for example, encodes the type of its resources (Writer), as well as their nationality (German) and genre (Science Fiction). Several approaches in the literature make use of fractions of this encoded information without exploiting its full potential. In this paper, we introduce an approach for the discovery of category axioms that uses information from the category network, category instances, and their lexicalisations. With DBpedia as background knowledge, we discover 703k axioms covering 502k of Wikipedia’s categories and populate the DBpedia knowledge graph with additional 4.4M relation assertions and 3.3M type assertions at more than 87% and 90% precision, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We use this version in order to be compatible with the most recent release of DBpedia from October 2016: https://wiki.dbpedia.org/develop/datasets.

  2. 2.

    Since the DBpedia ontology does not define any functional object properties, we use a heuristic approach and treat all properties which are used with multiple objects on the same subject in less than 5% of the subjects as functional. This heuristic marks 710 out of 1,355 object properties as functional.

  3. 3.

    https://spacy.io/.

  4. 4.

    https://www.nltk.org/.

  5. 5.

    https://github.com/nheist/Cat2Ax.

  6. 6.

    http://data.dws.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/Cat2Ax.

  7. 7.

    Release of October 2016: https://wiki.dbpedia.org/develop/datasets.

  8. 8.

    https://www.mturk.com/.

References

  1. Aprosio, A.P., Giuliano, C., Lavelli, A.: Extending the coverage of DBpedia properties using distant supervision over Wikipedia. In: NLP-DBpedia@ ISWC (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bryl, V., Bizer, C., Paulheim, H.: Gathering alternative surface forms for DBpedia entities. In: Workshop on NLP&DBpedia, pp. 13–24 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Färber, M., Bartscherer, F., Menne, C., Rettinger, A.: Linked data quality of DBpedia, Freebase, OpenCyc, Wikidata, and YAGO. Semant. Web 9, 1–53 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flati, T., et al.: Two is bigger (and better) than one: the Wikipedia bitaxonomy project. In: 52nd Annual Meeting of the ACL, vol. 1, pp. 945–955 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fleiss, J.L.: Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol. Bull. 76(5), 378 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fossati, M., Kontokostas, D., Lehmann, J.: Unsupervised learning of an extensive and usable taxonomy for DBpedia. In: 11th International Conference on Semantic Systems, pp. 177–184. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gerber, D., Ngomo, A.C.N.: Bootstrapping the linked data web. In: 1st Workshop on Web Scale Knowledge Extraction@ ISWC, vol. 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hearst, M.A.: Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In: 14th Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol. 2, pp. 539–545 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heist, N., Hertling, S., Paulheim, H.: Language-agnostic relation extraction from abstracts in Wikis. Information 9(4), 75 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hertling, S., Paulheim, H.: WebIsALOD: providing hypernymy relations extracted from the Web as linked open data. In: d’Amato, C., Fernandez, M., Tamma, V., Lecue, F., Cudré-Mauroux, P., Sequeda, J., Lange, C., Heflin, J. (eds.) ISWC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10588, pp. 111–119. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68204-4_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Hertling, S., Paulheim, H.: DBkWik: a consolidated knowledge graph from thousands of Wikis. In: IEEE International Conference on Big Knowledge, ICBK (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kozareva, Z., Hovy, E.: Learning arguments and supertypes of semantic relations using recursive patterns. In: 48th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pp. 1482–1491. ACL (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuhn, P., Mischkewitz, S., et al.: Type inference on Wikipedia list pages. Informatik 46, 2101–2111 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159–174 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lehmann, J.: DL-learner: learning concepts in description logics. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10(Nov), 2639–2642 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lehmann, J., Isele, R., Jakob, M., et al.: Dbpedia-a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from Wikipedia. Semant. Web 6(2), 167–195 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, Q., Xu, K., Zhang, L., Wang, H., Yu, Y., Pan, Y.: Catriple: extracting triples from wikipedia categories. In: Domingue, J., Anutariya, C. (eds.) ASWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5367, pp. 330–344. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89704-0_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Mahdisoltani, F., Biega, J., Suchanek, F.M.: YAGO3: a knowledge base from multilingual Wikipedias. In: CIDR (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mintz, M., Bills, S., et al.: Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data. ACL-AFNLP 2, 1003–1011 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Muñoz, E., Hogan, A., Mileo, A.: Triplifying Wikipedia’s tables. In: LD4IE@ ISWC, vol. 1057 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nastase, V., Strube, M.: Decoding Wikipedia categories for knowledge acquisition. AAAI 8, 1219–1224 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Paulheim, H.: Knowledge graph refinement: a survey of approaches and evaluation methods. Semant. Web 8(3), 489–508 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Paulheim, H., Bizer, C.: Type inference on noisy RDF data. In: Alani, H., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8218, pp. 510–525. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41335-3_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Paulheim, H., Ponzetto, S.P.: Extending DBpedia with Wikipedia list pages. NLP-DBpedia ISWC 13, 1–6 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ponzetto, S.P., Strube, M.: Deriving a large scale taxonomy from Wikipedia. AAAI 7, 1440–1445 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rettinger, A., Lösch, U., Tresp, V., d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N.: Mining the semantic web. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 24(3), 613–662 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Ringler, D., Paulheim, H.: One knowledge graph to rule them all? Analyzing the differences between DBpedia, YAGO, Wikidata & co. In: Kern-Isberner, G., Fürnkranz, J., Thimm, M. (eds.) KI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10505. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67190-1_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Ritze, D., Lehmberg, O., Bizer, C.: Matching HTML tables to DBpedia. In: 5th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, p. 10. ACM, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Suchanek, F.M., Kasneci, G., Weikum, G.: YAGO: a core of semantic knowledge. In: 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 697–706. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Velardi, P., Faralli, S., Navigli, R.: OntoLearn reloaded: a graph-based algorithm for taxonomy induction. Comput. Linguist. 39(3), 665–707 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vrandečić, D., Krötzsch, M.: Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase. Commun. ACM 57(10), 78–85 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu, B., Xie, C., et al.: Learning defining features for categories. In: IJCAI, pp. 3924–3930 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zaveri, A., Rula, A., Maurino, A., et al.: Quality assessment for linked data: a survey. Semant. Web 7(1), 63–93 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Heist .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Heist, N., Paulheim, H. (2019). Uncovering the Semantics of Wikipedia Categories. In: Ghidini, C., et al. The Semantic Web – ISWC 2019. ISWC 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11778. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30793-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30793-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30792-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30793-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics