Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Strategies for Primary Prevention of Occupational Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Occupational Cancers

  • 1062 Accesses

Abstract

Primary prevention of cancer refers to the prevention of new cases of cancer, whereas secondary prevention is aimed at reducing the negative health effects of the disease by early detection or treatment. There are three basic steps in the process of cancer prevention: risk identification, risk quantification, and risk reduction. These are discussed in detail below, after an introduction presenting the burden of occupational cancer and a review of the process in the identification and prevention of some well-established occupational carcinogens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. GLOBOCAN. 2012. Website: www.globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed 15 Aug 2011, 12 July 2017.

  2. Adami HO, Day NE, Trichopoulos D, et al. Primary and secondary prevention in the reduction of cancer morbidity and mortality. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37(Suppl 8):S118–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Danaei G, Vander Hoorn S, Lopez AD, et al. Comparative risk assessment collaborating group (cancers). Causes of cancer in the world: comparative risk assessment of nine behavioural and environmental risk factors. Lancet. 2005;366(9499):1784–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Doll R, Peto J. The causes of cancer, 1981. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981;66(6):1191–308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rushton L, Bagga S, Bevan R, et al. Occupation and cancer in Britain. Br J Cancer. 2010;102(9):1428–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Nurminen M, Karjalainen A. Epidemiologic estimate of the proportion of fatalities related to occupational factors in Finland. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001;27(3):161–213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Landrigan PJ. The prevention of occupational cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 1996;46(2):67–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Painting, firefighting, and shiftwork, vol. 98. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Polynuclear aromatic compounds. Part 4: Bitumen, coal-tars and derived products, vol. 33. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Some non-heterocyclic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and some related exposures, vol. 92. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hogstedt C, Jansson C, Hugosson M, et al. Cancer incidence in a cohort of Swedish chimney sweeps 1958–2006. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(9):1708–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Pukkala E, Martinsen JI, Lynge E, et al. Occupation and cancer – follow-up of 15 million people in five Nordic countries. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(5):646–790.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Polynuclear aromatic compounds. Part 2: Carbon blacks, mineral oils (lubricant base oils and derived products) and some nitroarenes, vol. 33. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wright JL, Morgan TM, Lin DW. Primary scrotal cancer: disease characteristics and increasing incidence. Urology. 2008;72(5):1139–43. [Epub 2008 Sept 16].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mustacchi P. Ramazzini and Rigoni-Stern on parity and breast cancer. Clinical impression and statistical corroboration. Arch Intern Med. 1961;108:639–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Colditz GA, Baer HJ, Tamini RM, et al. Breast cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni J, editors. Cancer epidemiology and prevention. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 995-10121022–39.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dietrich H, Dietrich B. Ludwig Rehn (1849–1930) – pioneering findings on the aetiology of bladder tumours. World J Urol. 2001;19(2):151–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Case RAM, Hosker ME, MC Donald DB, et al. Tumours of the urinary bladder in workmen engaged in the manufacture and use of certain dyestuff intermediates in the British chemical industry. Br J Ind Med. 1954;11:75–104.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kogevinas M, Sala M, Boffetta P, et al. Cancer risk in the rubber industry: a review of the recent epidemiological evidence. Occup Environ Med. 1998;55(1):1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans some aromatic amines, organic dyes, and related exposures, vol. 99. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010. p. 395.

    Google Scholar 

  21. MacBeth R. Malignant disease of the paranasal sinuses. J Laryngol Otol. 1965;79:592–612.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Wood dust and formaldehyde, vol. 62. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, a review of human carcinogens: arsenic, metals, fibres, and dusts, vol. 100C. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lilienfeld DE. The silence: the asbestos industry and early occupational cancer research – a case study. Am J Public Health. 1991;81(6):791–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Doll R. Mortality from lung cancer in asbestos workers. Br J Ind Med. 1955;12(2):81–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Collegium Ramazzini. Asbestos is still with us: repeat call for a universal ban. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52(5):469–72.

    Google Scholar 

  27. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Asbestos, vol. 14. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wagner JC, Sleggs CA, Marchand P. Diffuse pleural mesothelioma and asbestos exposure in the North Western Cape Province. Br J Ind Med. 1960;17:260–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hagemeyer O, Otten AE, Kraus AT. Asbestos consumption, asbestos exposure and asbestos-related occupational diseases in Germany. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006;79:613–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Plato N, Martinsen JI, Sparén P, et al. Occupation and mesothelioma in Sweden: updated incidence in men and women in the 27 years after the asbestos ban. Epidemiol Health. 2016;38:e2016039.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Creech JL Jr, Johnson MN. Angiosarcoma of liver in the manufacture of polyvinyl chloride. J Occup Med. 1974;16(3):150–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Maltoni C, Lefemine G. Carcinogenicity bioassays of vinyl chloride: current results. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975;246:195–218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Verma DK, Purdham JT, Roels HA. Translating evidence about occupational conditions into strategies for prevention. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59(3):205–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, 1,3-butadiene, ethylene oxide and vinyl halides (vinyl fluoride, vinyl chloride and vinyl bromide), vol. 97. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  35. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, some anti-thyroid and related substances, nitrofurans and industrial chemicals, vol. 7. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nicholson WJ, Landrigan PJ. Quantitative assessment of lives lost due to delay in the regulation of occupational exposure to benzene. Environ Health Perspect. 1989;82:185–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Henry NL, Hayes DF. Cancer biomarkers. Mol Oncol. 2012;6:140–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. da Silva J. DNA damage induced by occupational and environmental exposure to miscellaneous chemicals. Mutat Res. 2016;770:170–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Pearce N, Blair A, Vineis P, et al. IARC monographs: 40 years of evaluating carcinogenic hazards to humans. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123(6):507–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Birnbaum LS, Thayer KA, Bucher JR, et al. Implementing systematic review at the National Toxicology Program: status and next steps (Editorial). Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(4):A108.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Morgan RL, Thayer KA, Bero L, et al. GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health. Environ Int. 2016;92–93:611–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Rudén C, Hansson SO. Registration, Evaluation, and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH) is but the first step-how far will it take us? Six further steps to improve the European chemicals legislation. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(1):6–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kauppinen T, Toikkanen J, Pedersen D, et al. Occupational exposure to carcinogens in the European Union. Occup Environ Med. 2000;57(1):10–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kauppinen T, Toikkanen J, Pukkala E. From cross-tabulations to multipurpose exposure information systems: a new job-exposure matrix. Am J Ind Med. 1998;33(4):409–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kauppinen T, Heikkilä P, Plato N, et al. Construction of job-exposure matrices for the Nordic Occupational Cancer Study (NOCCA). Acta Oncol. 2009;48(5):791–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, a review of human carcinogens: chemical agents and related occupations, vol. 100F. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Doll R, Peto J. Asbestos. In: Effects on health of exposure to asbestos. Health and Safety Commission. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Olsson AC, Vermeulen R, Brüning T, et al. Exposure response analyses of asbestos and lung cancer pathologies in a pooled analysis of case-control studies in Europe and Canada. Epidemiology. 2017;28(2):288–99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Meek ME, Boobis AR, Crofton KM, et al. Risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals: a WHO/IPCS framework. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Apr 2 [Epub ahead of print].

    Google Scholar 

  50. Symanski E, Kupper LL, Hertz-Picciotto I, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of long-term trends in occupational exposure: Part 2. Predictive models for declining exposures. Occup Environ Med. 1998;55(5):310–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Symanski E, Kupper LL, Rappaport SM. Comprehensive evaluation of long-term trends in occupational exposure: Part 1. Description of the database. Occup Environ Med. 1998;55(5):300–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Hansson SO. Setting the limit. Occupational health standards and the limits of science. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Rappaport SM, Kupper LL. Quantitative exposure assessment. El Cerrito: Rappaport; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Vermeulen R, Silverman DT, Garshick E, et al. Exposure-response estimates for diesel engine exhaust and lung cancer mortality based on data from three occupational cohorts. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122(2):172–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Vehmas T, Sauni R, Miller AB, et al. Screening for asbestos-related lung cancer. In: Asbestos, asbestosis, and cancer. Helsinki criteria for diagnosis and attribution. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 2014. p. 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Cherrie JW, Van Tongeren M, Semple S. Exposure to occupational carcinogens in Great Britain. Ann Occup Hyg. 2007;51(8):653–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Per Gustavsson

Authors
  1. Per Gustavsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Per Gustavsson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

    Sisko Anttila

  2. Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

    Paolo Boffetta

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gustavsson, P. (2020). Strategies for Primary Prevention of Occupational Cancer. In: Anttila, S., Boffetta, P. (eds) Occupational Cancers. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30766-0_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30766-0_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30765-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30766-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation