Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Trends in Logic ((TREN,volume 53))

  • 464 Accesses

Abstract

Ordinal (vertex- and/or edge-) labeled finite trees are well-quasi-ordered by homeomorphic embeddability with sound gap-conditions. Such strong generalizations of Harvey Friedman’s tree theorem (abbr.: FT) on trees whose vertices are labeled by bounded natural numbers are (a) provable in second-order arithmetic \(\Pi _{1}^{1}\)-TR\(_{0}\) (also designated ITR\(_{0}\) below) that extends ACA\(_{0}\) by transfinite iteration of \(\Pi _{1}^{1}\)-comprehension along arbitrary countable ordinals but (b) not provable in a subsystem thereof that arises by weakening \(\Pi _{1}^{1}\)-transfinite recursion axiom to \(\Pi _{1}^{1}\)-transfinite recursion rule. In particular, I. Křiž’s tree theorem (abbr.: KřT) referring to ordinal edge-labeled trees [9] is provable in \(\Pi _{1}^{1}\)-TR\(_{0}\) (that is weaker than theory \(\Pi _{2}^{1}\)-CA implicitly used in [9]), which is the main result of the paper. Moreover KřT is proof-theoretically equivalent to the author’s analogous theorem (abbr.: GT) referring to ordinal vertex-labeled trees under symmetric gap-condition [6]. Namely, both theorems characterize ITR\(_{0}\) in the sense of ordinal provability over ACA\(_{0}\). That is, the supremum of proof-theoretic ordinals provable in ACA\(_{0}\) extended by GT and/or KřT is the proof-theoretic ordinal of ITR\(_{0}\) [in symbols: \(\left| \mathbf {ACA}_{0}+GT\right| =\left| \mathbf {ACA}_{0}+K\check{r}T\right| =\left| \Pi _{1}^{1}\text {-}\mathbf {TR}_{0}\right| =\psi 0\left( \Phi 10\right) \) (see [12] for the last equality)]. By contrast, the restricted GT and KřT referring to ordinal labeled intervals (i.e. non-branching trees) both yield analogous characterizations of a weaker (predicative) theory ATR\(_{0}\), instead of ITR\(_{0}\) (cf. [5]).

Basic version of this paper was presented at 14th British Combinatorial Conference held in University of Keele, 5–9 July, 1993.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We consider upward directed structured rooted trees whose roots are the bottom nodes.

  2. 2.

    Homeomorphisms in question preserve branching order.

  3. 3.

    This asymmetric gap-condition, due to M. Okada, upgrades Friedman’s asymmetric gap-condition (a) (see Introduction) that fails in the infinite ordinal domain (cf. [5, 7]).

  4. 4.

    In the next section we’ll show that \(s\left( n\right) \in \mathbb {N}\) holds for every \(n\in \mathbb {N}\).

References

  1. Dershowitz, N. (1987). Termination of rewriting. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 3(1–2), 69–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Friedman, H., McAloon, K., & Simpson, S. (1982). A finite combinatorial principle which is equivalent to the 1 consistency of predicative analysis. In G. Metakides (Ed.), Logic Symposium I (Patras 1980) (pp. 197–230). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallier, J. H. (1991). What’s so special about Kruskal’s theorem and the ordinal \(\Gamma _{0}\)? A survey of some results in proof theory. APAL, 53, 199–260.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gordeev, L. (1989). Systems of iterated projective ordinal notations and combinatorial statements about binary labeled trees. Archive for Mathematical Logic, 29, 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gordeev, L. (1989). Generalizations of the one-dimensional version of the Kruskal-Friedman theorems. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 54(1), 100–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gordeev, L. (1990). Generalizations of the Kruskal-Friedman theorems. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 55(1), 157–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gordeev, L. (1993). Quasi-ordinals and proof theory. Contemporary Mathematics, 147, 485–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Higman, G. (1952). Ordering by divisibility in abstract algebras. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 2, 326–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Křiž, I. (1989). Well-quasiordering finite trees with gap-condition. Proof of Harvey Friedman’s conjecture Annals of Mathematics, 130, 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kruskal, J. B. (1960). Well-quasi-ordering, the tree theorem, and Vazsonyi’s conjecture. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 95, 210–225.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pohlers, W. (1990). Proof Theory: An introduction, Lecture Notes in Math (Vol. 1407). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rathjen, M. (2010) Investigations of subsystems of second order arithmetic and set theory in strength between\(\Pi _{1}^{1}\)-CA and \(\Delta _{2}^{1}\)-CA+BI: Part I. In R. Schindler (Ed.), Ways of proof theory (pp. 363–439). Ontos Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rathjen, M., & Weiermann, A. (1993). Proof-theoretic investigations on Kruskal’s theorem. Annals of Pure and applied Logic, 61(1), 49–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Simpson, S. G. (1985). Nonprovability of certain combinatorial properties of finite trees. Harvey Friedman’s research on the foundation of mathematics (pp. 87–117). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Schütte, K., & Simpson, S. G. (1985). Ein in der reinen Zahlentheorie unbeweisbarer Satz über endliche Folgen von natürlichen Zahlen. Archive for Mathematical Logic, 25, 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lev Gordeev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gordeev, L. (2020). Strong WQO Tree Theorems. In: Schuster, P., Seisenberger, M., Weiermann, A. (eds) Well-Quasi Orders in Computation, Logic, Language and Reasoning. Trends in Logic, vol 53. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30229-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics