Abstract
Ordinal (vertex- and/or edge-) labeled finite trees are well-quasi-ordered by homeomorphic embeddability with sound gap-conditions. Such strong generalizations of Harvey Friedman’s tree theorem (abbr.: FT) on trees whose vertices are labeled by bounded natural numbers are (a) provable in second-order arithmetic \(\Pi _{1}^{1}\)-TR\(_{0}\) (also designated ITR\(_{0}\) below) that extends ACA\(_{0}\) by transfinite iteration of \(\Pi _{1}^{1}\)-comprehension along arbitrary countable ordinals but (b) not provable in a subsystem thereof that arises by weakening \(\Pi _{1}^{1}\)-transfinite recursion axiom to \(\Pi _{1}^{1}\)-transfinite recursion rule. In particular, I. Křiž’s tree theorem (abbr.: KřT) referring to ordinal edge-labeled trees [9] is provable in \(\Pi _{1}^{1}\)-TR\(_{0}\) (that is weaker than theory \(\Pi _{2}^{1}\)-CA implicitly used in [9]), which is the main result of the paper. Moreover KřT is proof-theoretically equivalent to the author’s analogous theorem (abbr.: GT) referring to ordinal vertex-labeled trees under symmetric gap-condition [6]. Namely, both theorems characterize ITR\(_{0}\) in the sense of ordinal provability over ACA\(_{0}\). That is, the supremum of proof-theoretic ordinals provable in ACA\(_{0}\) extended by GT and/or KřT is the proof-theoretic ordinal of ITR\(_{0}\) [in symbols: \(\left| \mathbf {ACA}_{0}+GT\right| =\left| \mathbf {ACA}_{0}+K\check{r}T\right| =\left| \Pi _{1}^{1}\text {-}\mathbf {TR}_{0}\right| =\psi 0\left( \Phi 10\right) \) (see [12] for the last equality)]. By contrast, the restricted GT and KřT referring to ordinal labeled intervals (i.e. non-branching trees) both yield analogous characterizations of a weaker (predicative) theory ATR\(_{0}\), instead of ITR\(_{0}\) (cf. [5]).
Basic version of this paper was presented at 14th British Combinatorial Conference held in University of Keele, 5–9 July, 1993.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We consider upward directed structured rooted trees whose roots are the bottom nodes.
- 2.
Homeomorphisms in question preserve branching order.
- 3.
- 4.
In the next section we’ll show that \(s\left( n\right) \in \mathbb {N}\) holds for every \(n\in \mathbb {N}\).
References
Dershowitz, N. (1987). Termination of rewriting. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 3(1–2), 69–116.
Friedman, H., McAloon, K., & Simpson, S. (1982). A finite combinatorial principle which is equivalent to the 1 consistency of predicative analysis. In G. Metakides (Ed.), Logic Symposium I (Patras 1980) (pp. 197–230). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Gallier, J. H. (1991). What’s so special about Kruskal’s theorem and the ordinal \(\Gamma _{0}\)? A survey of some results in proof theory. APAL, 53, 199–260.
Gordeev, L. (1989). Systems of iterated projective ordinal notations and combinatorial statements about binary labeled trees. Archive for Mathematical Logic, 29, 29–46.
Gordeev, L. (1989). Generalizations of the one-dimensional version of the Kruskal-Friedman theorems. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 54(1), 100–121.
Gordeev, L. (1990). Generalizations of the Kruskal-Friedman theorems. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 55(1), 157–181.
Gordeev, L. (1993). Quasi-ordinals and proof theory. Contemporary Mathematics, 147, 485–494.
Higman, G. (1952). Ordering by divisibility in abstract algebras. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 2, 326–336.
Křiž, I. (1989). Well-quasiordering finite trees with gap-condition. Proof of Harvey Friedman’s conjecture Annals of Mathematics, 130, 215–226.
Kruskal, J. B. (1960). Well-quasi-ordering, the tree theorem, and Vazsonyi’s conjecture. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 95, 210–225.
Pohlers, W. (1990). Proof Theory: An introduction, Lecture Notes in Math (Vol. 1407). Springer.
Rathjen, M. (2010) Investigations of subsystems of second order arithmetic and set theory in strength between\(\Pi _{1}^{1}\)-CA and \(\Delta _{2}^{1}\)-CA+BI: Part I. In R. Schindler (Ed.), Ways of proof theory (pp. 363–439). Ontos Verlag
Rathjen, M., & Weiermann, A. (1993). Proof-theoretic investigations on Kruskal’s theorem. Annals of Pure and applied Logic, 61(1), 49–88.
Simpson, S. G. (1985). Nonprovability of certain combinatorial properties of finite trees. Harvey Friedman’s research on the foundation of mathematics (pp. 87–117). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Schütte, K., & Simpson, S. G. (1985). Ein in der reinen Zahlentheorie unbeweisbarer Satz über endliche Folgen von natürlichen Zahlen. Archive for Mathematical Logic, 25, 75–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gordeev, L. (2020). Strong WQO Tree Theorems. In: Schuster, P., Seisenberger, M., Weiermann, A. (eds) Well-Quasi Orders in Computation, Logic, Language and Reasoning. Trends in Logic, vol 53. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30229-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30229-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30228-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30229-0
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)