Abstract
This chapter examines the way actor interests interfere with policy decision-making and public servants’ conception of integrity in Argentine local government. It begins by revealing some of the conditions that commonly structure their practice reality. In essence, a system of dominant relationships directs local governance which includes an embedded practice of corruption in formal and informal arenas. For example, the actions of business lobbyists and increasingly organized social movements along with the media apply pressure on decision-makers.
Next, an explanation is offered about different conceptions of integrity held by public servants operating in this practice reality, primarily based on their perceived need for situated judgment and agile action. In particular, understanding context and developing strong relational skills are vital. In safeguarding their own conceptions of integrity, they also develop skills to creatively present data analyses, construct convincing narratives, and apply discretion when using local regulations as powerful tools to influence policy-making.
It is clear that at times the practices of public servants lack impartiality and transparency. In this regard, some take actions to perpetuate the predominance of concentrated interests, while others fight to defend the common good (and against the neoliberal equivocations which often weaken the State in the name of transparency). The authors suggest that the growing interest in the issues of transparency and corruption requires a critical view of the pressures of public policy-making and of the ways in which the public interest is defended as well as introducing institutional design improvements and modifying some of the practices adopted by public servants.
References
Agamben, G. 2011. Qué es un dispositivo? Sociológica (México) 26: 249–264.
Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. 2006. Informe sobre la situación del servicio civil en América Latina. Washington, DC: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
Bourdieu, P. 2005. The social structures of the economy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P., and L. Wacquant. 2005. Una invitación a la sociología reflexiva. 2005, Siglo XXI Editores Argentina S. A. Buenos Aires, Argentina
Brown, E., and J. Cloke. 2004. Neoliberal reform, governance and corruption in the south: Assessing the international anti-corruption crusade. Antipode 36 (2): 272–294.
Calvo, E., and M.V. Murillo. 2013. When parties meet voters: Assessing political linkages through partisan networks and distributive expectations in Argentina and Chile. Comparative Political Studies 46 (7): 851–882.
Castells, M. 1977. The urban question: A Marxist approach. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Economist, T. (2019). The war against corruption in Latin America is in trouble. Retrieved from The Economist.
Flyvbjerg, B. 1998. Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Forester, J. 1980. Critical theory and planning practice. Journal of the American Planning Association 46 (3): 275–286.
———. 1989. Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Greenberg, M., and P. Lewis. 2017. The City is the factory: New solidarities and spatial strategies in an urban age. 1st ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hall, P. 2002. Cities of tomorrow: An intellectual history of urban planning and Design in the Twentieth Century. Chichester: Wiley.
Harvey, D. 1989. The urban experience. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hillier, J. 2002. Shadows of power: An allegory of prudence in land-use planning. London: Routledge.
Hoch, C. 1984. Doing good and being right: The pragmatic connection in planning theory. Journal of the American Planning Association 50 (3): 335–345.
INDEC. 2019. Mercado de trabajo. Tasas e indicadores socioeconómicos (EPH) [Press release].
Jessop, B. 2018. The state as a social relation. In State formations: Global histories and cultures of statehood, ed. G. Anderson, J.L. Brooke, and J.C. Strauss, 45–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martínez Mazzola, R. 2008. Continuidad o ruptura. Juan Carlos Portantiero piensa la herencia del populismo. Paper presented at the V Jornadas de Sociología de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata.
Matus, C. 1972. Estrategia y Plan. Mexico: SIGLO XXI.
———. 1991. Gobierno y Planificación: el Plan como Apuesta. Paper presented at the IV Curso Internacional de Alta Dirección, Caracas, Venezuela.
Naciones Unidas. 2004. Convención de las Naciones Unidas contra la Corrupción. New York: United Nations.
Oliveros, V. 2016. Making it personal: Clientelism, favors, and the personalization of public Administration in Argentina. Comparative Politics 48 (3): 373–391.
Poggiese, H. 1999. El papel de las redes en el desarrollo local como prácticas asociadas entre Estado y Sociedad. Retrieved from Código Penal de la Nación Argentina, Articulo 77 C.F.R. 1984.
Presidencia de la Nación. 1984. Law 11.179. Codigo Penal de la Nacion Argentina. Argentina.
Soja, E.W. 1989. Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Garay, A., Henderson, H. (2021). On Transparency, Corruption, and Integrity in Local Government: A View from Argentina. In: Sullivan, H., Dickinson, H., Henderson, H. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29980-4_67
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29980-4_67
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29979-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29980-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences