Skip to main content

Evaluating Organizational Structures and Institutional Policy for Wellbeing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wellbeing

Part of the book series: Success in Academic Surgery ((SIAS))

  • 1803 Accesses

Abstract

Much of the work on physician wellbeing has focused on bolstering individual skills. Because many drivers of poor wellbeing are attributable to the environment, we advocate an organizational view of the problem. In this chapter, we review quantitative and qualitative methodologies for evaluating organizational structures and institutional policies. We illustrate these techniques using examples from our experience characterizing surgical residency programs in the FIRST and SECOND Trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rotenstein LS, Torre M, Ramos MA, et al. Prevalence of burnout among physicians: a systematic review. JAMA. 2018;320:1131–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shanafelt TD, Noseworthy JH. Executive leadership and physician well-being: nine organizational strategies to promote engagement and reduce burnout. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92:129–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shanafelt T, Goh J, Sinsky C. The business case for investing in physician well-being. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:1826–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. West CP, Dyrbye LN, Erwin PJ, Shanafelt TD. Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;388:2272–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brigham T, Barden C, Dopp AL, et al. A journey to construct an all-encompassing conceptual model of factors affecting clinical well-being and resilience. Washington: National Academy of Medicine; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bilimoria KY, Chung JW, Hedges LV, et al. National cluster-randomized trial of duty-hour flexibility in surgical training. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:713–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang L, Cheung EOY, Ma M, et al. A conceptual model for understanding the learning environment and surgical resident wellbeing. (Abstract submitted to Surgical Education Week 2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hu YY, Ellis RJ, Hewitt DB, et al. Discrimination, Abuse, Harassment, and Burnout in Surgical Residency Training. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1741–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellis RJ, Holmstrom AL, Hewitt DB, et al. A comprehensive national survey on thoughts of leaving residency, alternative career paths, and reasons for staying in general surgery residency. Am J Surg 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schneider B, Ehrhart MG, Macey WH. Organizational climate and culture. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:361–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Leiter MP, Maslach C. Areas of worklife survey manual and sampler set. Menlo Park: Mind Garden, Inc.; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ling M, Young CJ, Shepherd HL, Mak C, Saw RP. Workplace bullying in surgery. World J Surg. 2016;40:2560–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nagata-Kobayashi S, Maeno T, Yoshizu M, Shimbo T. Universal problems during residency: abuse and harassment. Med Educ. 2009;43:628–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Richman JA, Flaherty JA, Rospenda KM, Christensen ML. Mental health consequences and correlates of reported medical student abuse. JAMA. 1992;267:692–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Crebbin W, Campbell G, Hillis DA, Watters DA. Prevalence of bullying, discrimination and sexual harassment in surgery in Australasia. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85:905–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rangel EL, Smink DS, Castillo-Angeles M, et al. Pregnancy and motherhood during surgical training. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(7):644–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baldwin DC Jr, Daugherty SR, Rowley BD. Racial and ethnic discrimination during residency: results of a national survey. Acad Med. 1994;69:S19–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Carr PL, Ash AS, Friedman RH, et al. Faculty perceptions of gender discrimination and sexual harassment in academic medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:889–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liebschutz JM, Darko GO, Finley EP, Cawse JM, Bharel M, Orlander JD. In the minority: black physicians in residency and their experiences. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006;98:1441–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Richman JA, Flaherty JA, Rospenda KM. Perceived workplace harassment experiences and problem drinking among physicians: broadening the stress/alienation paradigm. Addiction. 1996;91:391–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cook DJ, Liutkus JF, Risdon CL, Griffith LE, Guyatt GH, Walter SD. Residents' experiences of abuse, discrimination and sexual harassment during residency training. McMaster University Residency Training Programs. CMAJ. 1996;154:1657–65.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Shinsako SA, Richman JA, Rospenda KM. Training-related harassment and drinking outcomes in medical residents versus graduate students. Subst Use Misuse. 2001;36:2043–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dahlke AR, Johnson JK, Greenberg CC, et al. Gender differences in utilization of duty-hour regulations, aspects of burnout, and psychological well-being among general surgery residents in the United States. Ann Surg. 2018;268(2):204–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Trockel M, Bohman B, Lesure E, et al. A brief instrument to assess both burnout and professional fulfillment in physicians: reliability and validity, including correlation with self-reported medical errors, in a sample of resident and practicing physicians. Acad Psychiatr. 2018;42:11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Trockel M. Personal communication. 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Valid and reliable survey instruments to measure burnout, well-being, and other work-related dimensions. 2019. https://nam.edu/valid-reliable-survey-instruments-measure-burnout-well-work-related-dimensions/.

  27. Dyrbye LN, Meyers D, Ripp J, Dalal N, Bird SB, Sen S. A pragmatic approach for organizations to measure health care professional well-being. Washington: National Academy of Medicine; 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yue-Yung Hu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hu, YY., Bilimoria, K. (2020). Evaluating Organizational Structures and Institutional Policy for Wellbeing. In: Kim, E., Lindeman, B. (eds) Wellbeing. Success in Academic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29470-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29470-0_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29469-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29470-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics