Skip to main content

Deterrence: Concepts and Approaches for Current and Emerging Threats

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Deterrence

Abstract

By exploring and analysing the complexities associated with the development and application of the concept of deterrence in resolving conflicts, this chapter sets the context of the book. Deterrence has to do with maintaining the status quo by convincing an opponent or ally that the cost of an unwanted action is greater than the rewards. Deterrence, on the one hand can act as a delaying mechanism in dealing effectively with opponents, in which case the aim would be to contain a conflict and the focus is zero-sum and more short term. On the other, deterrence can have the role of a proactive mechanism, where the focus is longer term. To be able however, to make shifts from zero-sum to a positive-sum the deterring party needs to be aware of context specific variables such as the opponent’s values’ system, the mind-set, and decision making processes. Routinely, mirror-imaging influences decision making leading states to develop deterrence policies with limited impact and effectiveness, as deterrence requires an understanding of the other’s as well as one’s own motives, objectives, and decision-making processes. Mirror-imaging leads to questionable assumptions about opponents’ values and how they will behave under pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler E (2009) Complex deterrence in the asymmetric era. In: Paul TV et al (eds) Complex deterrence: strategy in the global age. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry B (1976) Power: an economic analysis. In: Barry B (ed) Power and political theory: some European perspectives. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Berejikian J (2002) A cognitive theory of deterrence. J Peace Res 2(39):167–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Byman D, Waxman MC (2002) The dynamics of coercion: American foreign policy and the limits of military might. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman L (2004) Deterrence. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman L (2008) The evolution of strategic thought. Adelphi Papers: The International Institute of Strategic Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Gearson J (2012) Deterring conventional terrorism: from punishment to denial and resilience. Contemp Secur Policy 1(33):171–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George A, Smoke R (1974) Deterrence in American foreign policy. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • George A, Hall D, Simons WR (eds) (1971) The limits of coercive diplomacy. Little Brown, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis R (2009) Complex deterrence in the asymmetric era. In: Paul TV et al (eds) Complex deterrence: strategy in the global age. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson G (2004) Introduction: the foreign office and British diplomacy in the twentieth century. Contemp Br Hist 18(3):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston AC, Warkentin M, Siponen MT (2015) An enhanced fear appeal rhetorical framework: leveraging threats to the human asset through sanctioning rhetoric. MIS Q 39(1):113–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knopf JW (2010) The fourth wave in deterrence research. Contemp Secur Policy 1(31):1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeing M, Pavel B (2012) How to deter terrorism. Wash Q 2(35):21–36. http://www.matthewkroenig.com/Kroenig_How%20to%20Deter%20Terrorism.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luttwak E (1974) The political uses of sea power. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttwak E (1987) Strategy: the logic of war and peace. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupovici A (2016) The power of deterrence: emotions, identity, American and Israeli wars of resolve. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Marighella C (1969) Minimanual of the urban guerrilla. Praetorian Press, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Miskimmon A, O’Loughlin B, Roselle L (2013) Strategic narratives: communication power and the new world order. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan P (2003) Deterrence now. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan P, Wirtz J, Paul TV (2009) Complex deterrence: strategy in the global age. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann PR, Smith MLR (2008) The strategy of terrorism: how it works and why it fails. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye J (2009) Get smart: combining hard and soft power. Foreign Aff 88(4):160. (July/August 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye J (2011) The future of power. Public Affairs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul TV, Morgan PM, Wirtz JJ (eds) (2009) Complex deterrence: strategy in the global age. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (2005) The laws. Penguin Classics, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson L (2006) What terrorists want. Random, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling TC (1960) The strategy of conflict. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, p 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling TC (1966) Arms and influence. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling TC (1977) Arms and influence, 2nd edn. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling TC (1982) Thinking about nuclear terrorism. Int Secur 6(4):61. (Spring 1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz NA, Kirk TR (2009) Policy and purpose: the economy of deterrence. Strateg Stud Q 3(1):11–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder GH (1961) Deterrence and defense. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stein JG (2013) Threat perception in international relations. https://www.surrey.ac.uk/politics/research/researchareasofstaff/isppsummeracademy/instructors%20/Stein%20-%20Threat%20Perception%20in%20International%20Relations.pdf. Accessed 19 Sept 2018

  • Vegetius (2012) De Re Militari (Concerning military affairs): the classic treatise on warfare at the Pinnacle of the Roman Empire’s Power. Leonaur

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Clausewitz C (1976) On war trans. Michael Howard and Peter Paret. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilner AS (2011) Deterring the undeterrable: coercion, denial, and delegitimisation in counterterrorism. J Strateg Stud 1(34):3–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anastasia Filippidou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Filippidou, A. (2020). Deterrence: Concepts and Approaches for Current and Emerging Threats. In: Filippidou, A. (eds) Deterrence. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29367-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics