Skip to main content

AutoML @ NeurIPS 2018 Challenge: Design and Results

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The NeurIPS '18 Competition

Abstract

We organized a competition on Autonomous Lifelong Machine Learning with Drift that was part of the competition program of NeurIPS 2018. This data driven competition asked participants to develop computer programs capable of solving supervised learning problems where the i.i.d. assumption did not hold. Large data sets were arranged in a lifelong learning and evaluation scenario and CodaLab was used as the challenge platform. The challenge attracted more than 300 participants in its 2 months duration. This chapter describes the design of the challenge and summarizes its main results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2017-03-16.

  2. 2.

    http://ciml.chalearn.org/home/schedule.

  3. 3.

    http://www.wcci2016.org/programs.php?id=home.

  4. 4.

    https://www.4paradigm.com/competition/pakdd2018.

  5. 5.

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/machine-learning/service/concept-automated-ml.

  6. 6.

    https://cloud.google.com/automl/.

  7. 7.

    https://www.4paradigm.com/competition/pakdd2019.

  8. 8.

    http://contrib.scikit-learn.org/categorical-encoding/.

  9. 9.

    http://competitions.codalab.org.

  10. 10.

    https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/19836.

  11. 11.

    https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/20203.

  12. 12.

    https://www.kdnuggets.com/2017/10/xgboost-top-machine-learning-method-kaggle-explained.html.

References

  1. J. Q. Candela, N. Lawrence, and A. Schwaighofer. Pascale 2 challenge: Learning when test and training inputs have different distributions challenge, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhiyuan Chen and Bing Liu. Lifelong Machine Learning. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Matthias Feurer, Aaron Klein, Katharina Eggensperger, Jost Springenberg, Manuel Blum, and Frank Hutter. Efficient and robust automated machine learning. In C. Cortes, N. D. Lawrence, D. D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28, pages 2962–2970. Curran Associates, Inc., 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Isabelle Guyon, Kristin Bennett, Gavin C. Cawley, Hugo Jair Escalante, Sergio Escalera, Tin Kam Ho, Núria Macià, Bisakha Ray, Mehreen Saeed, Alexander R. Statnikov, and Evelyne Viegas. Design of the 2015 chalearn automl challenge. In 2015 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN 2015, Killarney, Ireland, July 12–17, 2015, pages 1–8, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Isabelle Guyon, Imad Chaabane, Hugo Jair Escalante, Sergio Escalera, Damir Jajetic, James Robert Lloyd, Núria Macià, Bisakha Ray, Lukasz Romaszko, Michèle Sebag, Alexander R. Statnikov, Sébastien Treguer, and Evelyne Viegas. A brief review of the chalearn automl challenge: Any-time any-dataset learning without human intervention. In Proceedings of the 2016 Workshop on Automatic Machine Learning, AutoML 2016, co-located with 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2016), New York City, NY, USA, June 24, 2016, pages 21–30, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Isabelle Guyon, Gideon Dror, Vincent Lemaire, Daniel L. Silver, Graham Taylor, and David W. Aha. 2012 special issue: Analysis of the ijcnn 2011 utl challenge. Neural Networks, 32,:174–178, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Isabelle Guyon, Lisheng Sun-Hosoya, Marc Boullé, Hugo Jair Escalante, Sergio Escalera, Zhengying Liu, Damir Jajetic, Bisakha Ray, Mehreen Saeed, Michéle Sebag, Alexander Statnikov, WeiWei Tu, and Evelyne Viegas. Analysis of the automl challenge series 2015–2018. In AutoML, Springer series on Challenges in Machine Learning, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frank Hutter, Lars Kotthoff, and Joaquin Vanschoren, editors. Automatic Machine Learning. Springer Series on Challenges in Machine Learning. Springer, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haifeng Jin, Qingquan Song, and Xia Hu. Auto-keras: Efficient neural architecture search with network morphism. Technical report, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhengying Liu, Olivier Bousquet, André Elisseeff, Sergio Escalera, Isabelle Guyon, Julio Jacques, Adrien Pavao, Danny Silver, Lisheng Sun-Hosoya, Sebastien Treguer, Wei-Wei Tu, Jingsong Wang, and Quanming Yao. AutoDL Challenge Design and Beta Tests-Towards automatic deep learning. In CiML workshop @ NeurIPS2018, Montreal, Canada, December 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jorge G Madrid, Hugo Jair Escalante, Eduardo F Morales, Wei-Wei Tu, Yang Yu, Lisheng Sun-Hosoya, Isabelle Guyon, and Michèle Sebag. Towards AutoML in the presence of Drift: first results. In Workshop AutoML 2018 @ ICML/IJCAI-ECAI, Stockholm, Sweden, July 2018. Pavel Brazdil, Christophe Giraud-Carrier, and Isabelle Guyon.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sinno Jialin Pan and Qiang Yang. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans. on Knowl. and Data Eng., 22(10):1345–1359, October 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2825–2830, 2011.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. John R. Rice. The algorithm selection problem. In Computer Science Technical Reports. Purdue University. Paper 99, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  15. John R. Rice. The algorithm selection problem. In Morris Rubinoff and Marshall C. Yovits, editors, Advances in Computers, volume 15, pages 65–118. Elsevier, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Schlimmer and R. Granger. Beyond incremental processing: Tracking concept drift. In T. Kehler and S. Rosenschein, editors, Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 502–507. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Daniel L. Silver and Qiang Yang amd Lianghao Li. Lifelong machine learning systems: Beyond learning algorithms. In Lifelong Machine Learning: Papers from the 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium, pages 49–55, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful with the challenge sponsors 4Paradigm, Microsoft Research and ChaLearn, as well as the NeurIPS2018 competition chairs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugo Jair Escalante .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Escalante, H.J. et al. (2020). AutoML @ NeurIPS 2018 Challenge: Design and Results. In: Escalera, S., Herbrich, R. (eds) The NeurIPS '18 Competition. The Springer Series on Challenges in Machine Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29135-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29135-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29134-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29135-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics