Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Simulation-Based Training for Post-graduate Interprofessional Learners

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: InterProfessional Team Training and Simulation

Part of the book series: Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation ((CHS))

  • 1146 Accesses

Abstract

Interprofessional education (IPE) is a requirement for post-graduate learners. Many programs have used simulation-based training to fulfill this requirement and to improve patient care. This chapter reviews specific examples of simulation-based IPE to inform the development of curricula; focusing on challenges, resources for implementation, and tools to quantify the impact of IPE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. IOM. Health Professions Education: a bridge to quality. In: Greiner AC, Knebel E, editors. Institute of Medicine Committee on the Health Professions Education Summit. Washington, D.C.; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ACGME. ACGME Common Program Requirements, A.C.f.G.M. Education, editor. 2016 rev.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ACGME and ABS. The General Surgery Milestone Project, American Council for Graduate Medical Education and American Board of Surgery, editors. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ACGME and ABR. The Diagnostic Radiology Milestone Project, American Council for Graduate Medical Education and American Board of Radiology, editors. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kirkpatrick DI. Evaluating training programs: the four levels. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Capella J, et al. Teamwork training improves the clinical care of trauma patients. J Surg Educ. 2010;47(6):439–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Steinemann S, et al. In situ, multidisciplinary, simulation-based teamwork training improves early trauma care. J Surg Educ. 2011;68(3):472–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pucher PH, et al. Nontechnical skills performance and care processes in the management of the acute trauma patient. Surgery. 2014;155:902–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nishisaki A, et al. Effect of just-in-time simulation training on tracheal intubation procedure safety in the pediatric intensive care unit. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:214–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nishisaki A, et al. Evaluation of multidisciplinary simulation training on clinical performance and team behavior during tracheal intubation procedures in a pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12(4):406–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wong AH-W, et al. Making an “attitude adjustment” using a simulation-enhanced interprofessional education strategy to improve attitudes toward teamwork and communication. Simul Healthc. 2016;11:117–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mendel S. Interdisciplinary simulation using the cardiopulmonary bypass simulator. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2014;46:300–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller A, et al. Can a single brief intervention improve participants’ readiness for interprofessional learning? J Interprof Care. 2013;27(6):532–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Salam T, Saylor JL, Cowperthwait AL. Attitudes of nurse and physician trainees towards an interprofessional simulated education experience on pain assessment and management. J Interprof Care. 2015;29(3):276–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Falcone RA, et al. Multidisciplinary pediatric trauma team training using high fidelity trauma simulation. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43:1065–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sweeney A, et al. Senior pediatric residents as teachers for an innovative multidsciplinary mock code curriculum. J Grad Med Educ. 2011;3(3):446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Patterson MD, et al. In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:468–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Couto TB, et al. Team skills in actual, in situ, and in-center pediatric emergencies: performance levels across settings and perceptions of comparative educational impact. Simul Healthc. 2015;10:76–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Salam T, Collins M, Baker A-M. All the world’s a stage: integrating theater and medicine for interprofessional team building in physician and nurse residency programs. Ochsner J. 2012;12:359–62.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bays AM, et al. Interprofessional communication skills training for serious illness, evaluation of a small-group, simulated patient intervention. J Palliat Med. 2014;17(2):159–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Caylor S, et al. The use of virtual simulation and a modified teamSTEPPS training for multiprofessional education. Clin Simul Nurs. 2015;11(3):163–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McGrath JL, et al. Using virtual reality simulation environments to assess competence of emergency medicine learners. Acad Emerg Med. 2018;25:186–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. AAMC. Curriculum inventory and reports. 2016 [cited 2017 March 20]. Available from: http://www.aamc.org/initiatives/cir/.

  24. van Schaik SM, Plant J, O’Brien B. Challenges of interprofessional team training: a qualitative analysis of residents’ perceptions. Educ Health. 2015;28(1):52–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Phrampus PE, O’Donnell JM. Debriefing using a structured and supported approach. In: Levine AI, et al., editors. The comprehensive textbook of healthcare simulation. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013. p. 73–84.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Lagan C, et al. Evaluation of an interprofessional clinician-patient communication workshop utilizing standardized patient methodology. J Surg Educ. 2013;70(1):95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. van Schaik SM, et al. Does source matter? Nurses’ and physicians’ perceptions of interprofessional feedback. Med Educ. 2016;50(2):181–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stefanidis D, et al. Are nursing students appropriate partners for interdisciplinary training of surgery residents. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(5):823–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schlitzkus LL, et al. What do surgical nurses know about surgical residents. J Surg Educ. 2009;66(6):383–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Steinemann S, et al. Role confusion and self-assessment in interprofessional trauma teams. Am J Surg. 2016;211:482–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. ACGME. ACGME Task Force on Quality Care and Professionalism, Philibert I and Amis S, editors. Chicago; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Interprofessional Education Collection. MedEdPORTAL Publications [cited 2017 March 17]. Available from: http://www.mededportal.org/collections/ipe/.

  33. AHRQ. TeamSTEPPS(R) 2.0. 2016. Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/index.html.

  34. American College of Surgeons Educational Programs. [cited 2017 March 20]. Available from: http://www.facs.org/education/program.

  35. Luecht RM, et al. Assessing professional perceptions: design and validation of an interdisciplinary education perception scale. J Allied Health. 1990;19(2):181–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Parsell G, Bligh J. The development of a questionnaire to assess the readiness of health care students for interprofessional learning (RIPLS). Med Educ. 1999;33(2):95–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rossler KL, Kimble LP. Capturing readiness to learn and collaboration as exposured with an interprofessional simulation scenario: a mixed-methods research study. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;36:348–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Murphy JI, Nimmagadda J. Partnering to provide simulated learning to address Interprofessional Education Collaborative core competencies. J Interprof Care. 2015;29(3):258–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hojat M, et al. Psychometric properties of an attitude scale measuring physician-nurse collaboration. Eval Health Prof. 1999;22(2):208–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Garber JS, et al. Attitudes towards collaboration and servant leadership among nurses, physicians and residents. J Interprof Care. 2009;23(4):331–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sachdeva AK, Pellegrini CA, Johnson KA. Support for simulation-based surgical education through American College of Surgeons – Accredited Education Institutes. World J Surg. 2008;32:196–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. American College of Surgeons Accredited Education Institutes. [cited 2017 March 20]. Available from: https://www.facs.org/education/accreditation/aei.

  43. Ogunyemi D, et al. From the eye of the nurses: 360-degree evaluation of residents. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009;29(2):105–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Harrington DT, et al. What shape is your resident in? Using a radar plot to guide a milestone clinical competency discussion. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(6):e294–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sexton JB, et al. The safety attitudes questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. ACGME. Resident/Fellow and Faculty Surveys [cited 2017 March 17]. Data Collection Systems. Available from: http://www.acgme.org/Data-Collection-Systems/Resident-Fellow-and-Faculty-Surveys.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SimTiki Simulation Center, John A Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA

    Jannet Lee-Jayaram & Benjamin W. Berg

  2. Department of Surgery, John A Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA

    Susan Steinemann

Authors
  1. Jannet Lee-Jayaram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benjamin W. Berg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Susan Steinemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Steinemann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University (LSU) Health, New Orleans School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA

    John T. Paige

  2. Organizational Psychologist, Sonnenschein Consulting, LLC, New Orleans, LA, USA

    Shirley C. Sonesh

  3. Associate Dean for Professional Practice, Community Service and Advanced Nursing Practice, Professor of Clinical Nursing, LSUHSC School of Nursing, New Orleans, LA, USA

    Deborah D. Garbee

  4. Nurse Anesthesia Program Director, Louisiana State University (LSU) Health, School of Nursing, New Orleans, LA, USA

    Laura S. Bonanno

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lee-Jayaram, J., Berg, B.W., Steinemann, S. (2020). Simulation-Based Training for Post-graduate Interprofessional Learners. In: Paige, J., Sonesh, S., Garbee, D., Bonanno, L. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: InterProfessional Team Training and Simulation. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28845-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28845-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28844-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28845-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation