Skip to main content

Defense Diplomacy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Diplomacy

Abstract

Few academic studies deal explicitly with defense diplomacy. It is only recently that the term gained ground in the vocabulary of practitioners. The idea of defense diplomacy in its contemporary meaning emerged during the 1990s and suggests the use of military channels—or of experts in defense issues—to help build a climate of trust, and convergence. Thus, as the term indicates, it has to do more with diplomacy than military efficiency per se. Defense diplomacy is no gunboat diplomacy, nor mere military cooperation. This chapter will examine the evolution, use, and limits of the concept, showing how it refers to accurate practices, how it is enshrined in a liberal approach, and how the changing sociology of its actors raises the question of its relevance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Three “military tasks” were mentioned: arms control (including non-proliferation, confidence-building, and safety measures), a policy of engagement toward former Communist Europe, including Russia, and “other overseas military cooperation activities.”

  2. 2.

    F. Sanz Roldán, “La diplomacia de defensa: una aproximación desde España,” Revista Arbor, CLXV (651), 2000: 519–527 cited in Cheyre (2013).

  3. 3.

    A case in point: Centre for Strategic Studies, “Regional Defence Diplomacy: What Is It and What Are Its Limits,” Strategic Background Paper, 21, Auckland, New Zealand, CSS, 2015.

  4. 4.

    Since 2008, French White Papers on Defense (Livres blancs français de la defense) have stressed “defense and national security.” Other countries such as the UK have experienced the same evolution.

References

  • Aron, Raymond, Paix et guerre entre les nations, Paris, Calmann-Lévy, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Carol, Military Soft Power: Public Diplomacy Through Military Educational Exchanges, New York (NY), Rowman & Littlefield, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blannin, Patrick, Defence Diplomacy in the Long War, Leyde, Martinus Nijhoff, Brill Research Perspectives, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheyre, Juan Emilio, “Defence Diplomacy,” in Andrew F. Cooper, Jorge Heine, Ramesh Thakur (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottey, Andrew, Forster, Anthony, “Reshaping Defence Diplomacy: New Roles for Military Cooperation and Assistance,” Adelphi Papers, 44 (365), 2004: 1–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devin, Guillaume, “Les diplomaties de la politique étrangère,” in Frédéric Charillon (ed.), Politique étrangère. Nouveaux regards, Paris, Presses de Sciences Po, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doise, Jean, Vaïsse, Maurice, Diplomatie et outil militaire. Politique étrangère de la France (1871–2015), Paris, Seuil, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF), “Defence Attachés,” DCAF Backgrounder series, July 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresles, François, “La ‘société militaire’: son devenir à la lumière de la professionnalisation,” Revue française de sociologie, 44 (4), 2003: 777–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, Alice, “Defence Diplomacy and Security Sector Reform,” Contemporary Security Policy, 21 (1), 2000: 46–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons, The Strategic Defence Review White Paper, London, House of Commons, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joana, Jean, Les Armées contemporaines, Paris, Presses de Sciences Po, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, Yasuhiro, “An Essay on China’s Military Diplomacy: Examination of Intentions in Foreign Strategy,” NIDS Security Reports, 7, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Defence, The Strategic Defence Review: A New Chapter, London, Ministry of Defence, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, Joseph, The Future of Power, New York (NY), Public Affairs, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, David, The Process and Politics of Defense Acquisition: A Reference Handbook, New York (NY), Praeger, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • State Department, Congressional Budget Justification for Foreign Operations, Washington (DC), SD, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendling, Cécile, “L’approche globale dans la gestion civilo-militaire des crises: analyse critique et prospective du concept,” Cahiers de l’Irsem, 6, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipper de Fabiani, Henry, “La ‘diplomatie de défense,’ composante essentielle de la diplomatie préventive. Vers une nouvelle symbiose entre diplomatie et défense,” in Centre Thucydide (ed.), Annuaire français des relations internationales, Paris, Bruylant, 2002, pp. 614–629.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Charillon, F., Balzacq, T., Ramel, F. (2020). Defense Diplomacy. In: Balzacq, T., Charillon, F., Ramel, F. (eds) Global Diplomacy. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28786-3_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics