Skip to main content

Individual Differences and Personality

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Psychology Learning and Teaching

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

  • 1222 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter first introduces the aims, scope, history, achievements, and current state of personality and individual differences (PID) as a subdiscipline of psychology. Section “Purposes and Rationale of Curricula” describes guidelines for the composition of PID curricula provided by academic associations. The third section presents knowledge, comprehension, and competencies as components of the content to be taught. Knowledge includes concepts, theories, research methods, controversies, and important research findings. Comprehension pertains to the location of PID in psychology, the hierarchical structure of personality, the bandwidth-fidelity dilemma, the difference between absolute and relative consistency and stability, the data box, and the meaning of heritability estimates. Competencies and skills consist of tracing literature and appropriate instruments, administering tests correctly, reading texts, designing and executing studies, and analyzing data. Section “Teaching, Learning, and Assessment: Approaches and Strategies” introduces teaching, learning, and assessment resources. Section “Challenges and Lessons Learned” describes challenges in teaching PID, resulting from confusion about the existence of multiple theories and research designs and from insufficient knowledge about research methods. Section “Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Resources” recommends books, journals, and online materials as teaching and learning resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, 1–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APA (American Psychological Association) (2013). APA Guidelines for the Undergraduate Psychology Major. New York: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asendorpf, J. B., Conner, M., et al. (2013). Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality, 27, 108–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, A., Schmitt, M., et al. (2017). Integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. European Journal of Personality, 31, 503–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, G., Rauthmann, J. F., Göllner, R., Lischetzke, T., & Schmitt, M. (2018). The nonlinear interaction of person and situation (NIPS) model: Theory and empirical evidence. European Journal of Personality, 32, 286–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, G., & Schmitt, M. (2017). The nonlinear interaction of person and situation (NIPS) model and its values for a psychology of situations. In J. F. Rauthmann, D. C. Funder, & R. Sherman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psychological situations (pp. 1–17). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswik, E (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H., & Plomin, R. (1975). A temperament theory of personality development. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1950). Personality: A systematical theoretical and factual study. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). The data box: Its ordering of total resources in terms of possible relational systems. In R. B. Cattell (Ed.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 67–128). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities. Their structure, growth, and action. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook-Sather, A. (2009). Learning from the student’s perspective: A sourcebook for effective teaching. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deary, I. J. (2014). The stability of intelligence from childhood to old age. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 239–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York, NY: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denissen, J. A., Luhmann, M., Chung, J. M., & Bleidorn, W. (2019). Transactions between life events and personality traits across the adult lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 612–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N. S. (1975). A person - situation interaction model for anxiety. In C. D. Spielberger & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (Vol. 1, pp. 145–164). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N. S., & Hunt, J. M. (1966). Sources of behavioral variance as measured by the S-R inventory of anxiousness. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 336–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N. S., & Magnusson, D. (1976). Toward an interactional psychology of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 956–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S., & O’Brien, E. (1985). The person-situation debate in historical and current perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 513–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1953). The structure of human personality. London, UK: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleeson, W. (2001). Towards a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funder, D. C. (2009). Persons, behaviors and situations: An agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 120–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons in theory and practice. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1996). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York, NY: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (2018). g theory: How recurring variation in human intelligence and the complexity of everyday tasks create social structure and the democratic dilemma. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of human intelligence (pp. 130–151). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1972). The psychophysiological nature of introversion-extraversion: A modification of Eysenck’s theory. In D. Nebylitsyn & J. A. Gray (Eds.), The biological bases of individual behaviour (pp. 182–205). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1928). Studies in the nature of character: I studies in deceit. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayawickreme, E., Zachry, C. E., & Fleeson, W. (2019). Whole trait theory: An integrative approach to examining personality structure and process. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J., Kazen, M., & Quirin, M. (2014). The theory of personality systems interactions (PSI). Revista Mexicana de psichologia, 31, 90–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J., Quirin, M., & Koole, S. L. (2015). Being someone: The integrated self as a neuropsychological system. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. J., Wedow, R., et al. (2018). Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals. Nature Genetics, 50, 1112–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1994). Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 25–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. Oxford, UK: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Nature, 121(3052), 662–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., & Neiderhiser, J. M. (2016). Top 10 replicated findings from behavioral genetics. Perspective of Psychological Science, 11, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauthmann, J. F., Funder, D. C., & Sherman, R. (Eds.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of psychological situations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauthmann, J. F., Gallardo-Pujol, D., et al. (2014). The situational eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 677–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 117–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1954). On becoming a person. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (1, No. 609).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaie, K. W. (1965). A general model for the study of developmental problems. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 92–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York, NY: Meredith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1904). General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steyer, R., Mayer, A., Geiser, C., & Cole, D. A. (2015). A theory of states and traits-revised. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 11, 71–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steyer, R., & Schmitt, M. (1990). The effects of aggregation across and within occasions on consistency, specificity. and reliability. Methodika, 4, 58–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyer, R., Schmitt, M., & Eid, M. (1999). Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strelau, J. (1998). Temperament. A psychological perspective. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1920). Intelligence and its use. Harper’s Magazine, 140, 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P. E. (1950). The structure of human abilities. London, UK: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1991). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorder. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manfred Schmitt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Schmitt, M. (2023). Individual Differences and Personality. In: Zumbach, J., Bernstein, D.A., Narciss, S., Marsico, G. (eds) International Handbook of Psychology Learning and Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28745-0_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics