Abstract
The article investigates the influence of cybernetic concepts—specifically, feedback, steering, self-regulation, adaptive/autocorrective behavior—on contemporary organizational thinking. By tracing these concepts back to cybernetics, particularly the thought of Stafford Beer and Kurt Lewin, the aim is to understand the cybernetic roots of current forms of (post-)industrial governmentality and analyze these foundations critically. As the authors show, particularly the counterintuitive combination of freedom and control is still relevant for an understanding of contemporary strands of systems and management thinking and, relatedly, the forms of governmentality implied and induced by them. Eventually, the aim is to highlight that current forms of neocybernetic regulation tend less to a reduction of domination than to its transformation into what the authors term, along with Günther Anders, integral domination.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Ajunwa, I., Crawford, K., & Schultz, J. (2017). Limitless Worker Surveillance. California Law Review, 105, 735–776.
Anders, G. (1998). Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen, Bd. II. Über die Zerstörung des Lebens im Zeitalter der dritten Revolution. Munich: C.H. Beck.
Ashby, W. R. (1966). Design for a Brain: The Origins of Adaptive Behavior. London: Chapman & Hall.
Beer, S. (1959). Cybernetics and Management. New York: Wiley.
Beer, S. (1966). Decision and Control: The Meaning of Operational Research and Management Cybernetics. New York: Wiley.
Beer, S. (1973). Fanfare for Effective Freedom. Cybernetic Praxis in Government. Brighton: Brighton Polytechnic.
Beer, S. (1981). Brain of the Firm. New York: Wiley.
Beer, S. (1990). Diagnosing the Systems for Organisations. New York: Wiley.
Beer, S. (1994a). Designing Freedom. New York: Wiley.
Beer, S. (1994b). Platform for Change. New York: Wiley.
Berman, A. E. (2016). MIT’s Sandy Pentland: Big Data Can Be a Profoundly Humanizing Force in Industry. Singularity Hub. Retrieved from https://singularityhub.com/2016/05/16/mits-sandy-pentland-big-data-can-be-a-profoundly-humanizing-force-in-industry/#sm.000013ul87680cdccw6vixhd467rr.
Bernard, A. (2017). Komplizen des Erkennungsdienstes. Das Selbst in der digitalen Kultur. Frankfurt a.M.: S. Fischer.
Bigelow, J., Rosenblueth, A., & Wiener, N. (1943). Behavior, Purpose, Teleology. Philosophy of Science, 10(1), 18–24.
Braun, C., Cornelissen, N. I., & von Hehn, S. (2015). Kulturwandel in Organisationen. Ein Baukasten für angewandte Psychologie im Change-Management. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
Bröckling, U. (2016). The Entrepreneurial Self: Fabricating a New Type of Subject. London: Sage.
Bröckling, U. (2017). Gute Hirten führen sanft. Über Menschenregierungskünste. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Chun, W. (2016). Big Data as Drama. ELH, 83(2), 363–382.
Cummings, S., Bridgman, T., & Brown, K. G. (2016). Unfreezing Change as Three Steps: Rethinking Kurt Lewin’s Legacy for Change Management. Human Relations, 69(1), 33–60.
Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the Societies of Control. October, 59, 3–7.
Drucker, P. (1993). Management (rev. ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
Drucker, P. (2001). The Essential Drucker. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Drucker, P. (2006). The Practice of Management. New York: HarperCollins.
Dyer-Witheford, N. (2017). Cyber-Proletariat: Global Labour in the Digital Vortex. London: Pluto.
Dymek, M., & Zackariasson, P. (Eds.). (2017). The Business of Gamification: A Critical Analysis. London: Routledge.
Eugster, D. (2013). Mikrodispositive: Die kurze Geschichte eines Automatenladens. In J. Caborn Wengler, B. Hoffarth, & Ł. Kumięga (Eds.), Verortungen des Dispositiv-Begriffs. Analytische Einsätze zu Raum, Bildung, Politik (pp. 57–72). Wiesbaden: Springer.
Felin, T. (2014, November 13). Nudge: Manager as Choice Architect (Oxford Said Business School Working Paper 2014–13). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2523922.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books.
Galison, P. (1994). The Ontology of the Enemy: Norbert Wiener and the Cybernetic Vision. Critical Inquiry, 21(1), 228–266.
Horkheimer, M. (1947). Eclipse of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hörl, E., & Hagner, M. (Eds.). (2008). Die Transformation des Humanen: Beiträge zur Kulturgeschichte der Kybernetik. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Krüger, W., & Bach, N. (2015). Excellence in Change: Wege zur strategischen Erneuerung. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Lewin, K. (1947a). Frontiers in Group Dynamics: Concept, Method and Reality in Social Science; Social Equilibria and Social Change. Human Relations, 1, 5–41.
Lewin, K. (1947b). Frontiers in Group Dynamics, Part II-B: Feedback Problems of Social Diagnosis and Action. Human Relations, 1, 147–153.
Lovink, G. (2016). Social Media Abyss: Critical Internet Cultures and the Force of Negation. Cambridge: Polity.
Malik, F. (2004a). Systemisches Management, Evolution, Selbstorganisation – Grundprobleme, Funktionsmechanismen und Lösungsansätze für komplexe Systeme. Bern: Haupt.
Malik, F. (2004b). Konservatismus und effektives Management: Wege aus der Orientierungskrise. In P. F. Drucker & P. Paschek (Eds.), Kardinaltugenden effektiver Führung (pp. 25–40). Heidelberg: Redline.
Malik, F. (2013). Strategy: Navigating the Complexity of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maschewski, F., & Nosthoff, A. (2018, September 27). Das Silicon Valley schafft die Freiheit ab – im Namen der Freiheit. Retrieved from https://www.republik.ch/2018/09/27/das-silicon-valley-schafft-die-freiheit-ab-im-namen-der-freiheit.
Maschewski, F., & Nosthoff, A. (2019a). ‘We Have to Coordinate the Flow’ oder: Die Sozialphysik des Anstoßes. Zum Steuerungs- und Regelungsdenken neokybernetischer Politiken. In A. Friedrich et al. (Eds.), Jahrbuch Technikphilosophie 2019, Steuern und Regeln (pp. 31–46). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Maschewski, F., & Nosthoff, A. (2019b). The Obsolescence of Politics: Rereading Günther Anders’s Critique of Cybernetic Governance and Integral Power in the Digital Age. Thesis Eleven, 153(1), 75–93.
Maschewski, F., & Nosthoff, A. (2019c). Die Gesellschaft der Wearables. Digitale Verführung und soziale Kontrolle. Berlin: Nicolai Publishing & Intelligence.
Mau, S. (2017). Das metrische Wir. Über die Quantifizierung des Sozialen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Meißner, S. (2015). Techniken des Sozialen. Gestaltung und Organisation des Zusammenarbeitens in Unternehmen. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Mersch, D. (2017, October 12). Digital Criticism: A Critique of ‘Algorithmic’ Reason. Retrieved from https://www.diaphanes.net/titel/digital-criticism-5313.
Moore, P. V. (2017). The Quantified Self in Precarity: Work, Technology and What Counts. London: Routledge.
Morozov, E. (2014, October 6). The Socialist Origins of Big Data. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/10/13/planning-machine.
Nachtwey, O., & Staab, P. (2016, April 29). Die Digitalisierung der Dienstleistungsgesellschaft. Retrieved from http://www.bpb.de/apuz/225692/die-digitalisierung-der-dienstleistungsarbeit?p=all.
Pentland, A. (2008). Honest Signals: How They Shape Our World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pentland, A. (2014, March 7). Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread. Retrieved from https://talksat.withgoogle.com/talk/social-physics.
Pentland, A. (2015a). Social Physics: How Social Networks Can Make Us Smarter. London: Penguin Books.
Pentland, A. (2015b, April 25). Social Physics Can Change Your Company (and the World). Retrieved from https://www.wnyc.org/story/401-social-physics-can-change-your-company-and-the-world/.
Pias, C. (2004). Unruhe und Steuerung. Zum utopischen Potential der Kybernetik. In J. Rüsen (Ed.), Die Unruhe der Kultur. Potentiale des Utopischen (pp. 301–325). Weilerswist: Velbrück.
Poljanšek, T. (2017). Die Vorstrukturierung des Möglichen – Latenz und Technisierung. In A. Friedrich et al. (Eds.), Jahrbuch Technikphilosophie 2017, Technisches Nichtwissen (pp. 17–40). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Rancière, J. (2003). The Philosopher and His Poor. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London: Continuum.
Richardson, G. P. (1991). Feedback Thought in Social Science and Systems Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Rothman, J. (2014, June 3). Big Data Comes to the Office. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/books/joshua-rothman/big-data-comes-to-the-office.
Schaupp, S. (2016a). Digitale Selbstüberwachung. Self-Tracking im kybernetischen Kapitalismus. Münster: Verlag Graswurzelrevolution.
Schaupp, S. (2016b). ‘Wir nennen es flexible Selbstkontrolle’: Self-Tracking als Selbsttechnologie des kybernetischen Kapitalismus. In S. Duttweiler et al. (Eds.), Leben nach Zahlen: Self-Tracking als Optimierungsprojekt? (pp. 63–86). Bielefeld: transcript.
Schaupp, S. (2017). Vergessene Horizonte. Der Kapitalismus und seine Alternativen. In P. Buckermann et al. (Eds.), Kybernetik, Kapitalismus, Revolutionen (pp. 51–74). Münster: Unrast.
Scheiber, N. (2017, April 2). How Uber Uses Psychological Tricks to Push Its Driver’s Buttons. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/04/02/technology/uber-drivers-psychological-tricks.html?_r=0.
Seibel, B. (2016). Cybernetic Government: Informationstechnologie und Regierungsrationalität von 1943–1970. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Sinha, V., et al. (2012). The Contemporary Framework on Social Media Analytics as an Emerging Tool for Behaviour Informatics, HR Analytics and Business Process. Management, 17(2), 65–84.
Solon, O. (2018, February 1). Amazon Patents Wristband That Tracks Warehouse Workers’ Movements. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jan/31/amazon-warehouse-wristband-tracking.
Stalder, F. (2017). The Digital Condition. London: Polity.
Sullivan, J. (2013, February 26). How Google Is Using People Analytics to Completely Reinvent HR. Retrieved from https://www.tlnt.com/how-google-is-using-people-analytics-to-completely-reinvent-hr/.
Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Why Nudge? The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2016). The Ethics of Influence: Government in the Age of Behavioral Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. H. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Tiqqun. (2001). The Cybernetic Hypothesis. Retrieved from http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/tiqqun-the-cybernetic-hypothesis.
Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Traue, B. (2010). Das Subjekt der Beratung. Zur Soziologie einer Psycho-Technik. Bielefeld: transcript.
Turner, F. (2006). From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Vehlken, S. (2004). Environment for Decision – Die Medialität einer kybernetischen Staatsregierung. Retrieved from http://homepage.univie.ac.at/sebastian.vehlken/files/2007_04_04_Magisterarbeit%20Cybersyn%20Sebastian%20Vehlken.pdf.
Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maschewski, F., Nosthoff, AV. (2019). “Designing Freedom”: On (Post)Industrial Governmentality and Its Cybernetic Fundaments. In: Meyer, U., Schaupp, S., Seibt, D. (eds) Digitalization in Industry. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28258-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28258-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28257-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28258-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)