Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theorising Political Economy in Southeast Asia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Political Economy of Southeast Asia

Part of the book series: Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy ((PEPP))

Abstract

This chapter discusses contending theoretical approaches to political economy relevant to the study of Southeast Asia and outlines the approach taken in the rest of this book. After introducing the basic notion of “political economy”, we outline three contending approaches used to understand it: Weberianism, historical institutionalism, and the Murdoch School.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acharya, A. (1999). Southeast Asia’s democratic moment. Asian Survey, 39(3), 418–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ADB [Asian Development Bank]. (2018). Asian development outlook 2018: How technology affects jobs. Manila: ADB.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. (1989). Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. (2001). The rise of “the rest”: Challenges to the West from late-industrializing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andriesse, E. (2015). Regional dynamics of capitalism in the Greater Mekong Subregion: The case of the rubber industry in Laos. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 50(1), 74–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anter, A. (2014). Max Weber’s theory of the modern state: Origins, structure and significance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arshad, A. (2017, March 27). Tax amnesty: Indonesians repatriate $8.8bn from Singapore. Straits Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism and the state in Indonesia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. (2002). Institutionalism: Old and new. In J. Summers (Ed.), Government, politics, power and policy in Australia (7th ed., pp. 363–380). Sydney: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., & Feng, H. (2013). The rise of the People’s Bank of China: The politics of institutional development in China’s monetary and financial systems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., & Feng, H. (2014). How proximate and “meta-institutional” contexts shape institutional change: Explaining the rise of the People’s Bank of China. Political Studies, 62(1), 197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellin, E. (2000). Contingent democrats: Industrialists, labor, and democratization in late-developing countries. World Politics, 52(1), 175–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieler, A., & Morton, A. D. (2018). Global capitalism, global war, global crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, M., & van de Walle, N. (1994). Neopatrimonial regimes and political transitions in Africa. World Politics, 46(4), 453–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., Jessop, B., Jones, M., & MacLeod, G. (2003). Introduction: State space in question. In N. Brenner, B. Jessop, M. Jones, & G. MacLeod (Eds.), State/space: A reader (pp. 1–26). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero-Anthony, M. (2005). Regional security in Southeast Asia: Beyond the ASEAN way. Singapore: ISEAS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cammack, P. (1989). Bringing the state back in? British Journal of Political Science, 19(2), 261–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capoccia, G. (2015). Critical junctures and institutional change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Advances in comparative-historical analysis (pp. 147–179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Capoccia, G., & Kelemen, R. D. (2007). The study of critical junctures: Theory, narrative and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World Politics, 59(3), 341–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, T. (2002). The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, T. (2010). Delusions of development: The World Bank and the post-Washington consensus in Southeast Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, T. (2012). Working on, through and around the state: The deep marketisation of development in the Asia-Pacific. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 42(3), 378–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, T., & Jarvis, D. S. L. (2014). Theorising Asia’s marketisation under late capitalism: Risk, capital and the new politics of development. In T. Carroll & D. S. L. Jarvis (Eds.), The politics of marketising Asia (pp. 1–23). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, T., & Jarvis, D. S. L. (2017). Disembedding autonomy: Asia after the developmental state. In T. Carroll & D. S. L. Jarvis (Eds.), Asia after the developmental state: Disembedding autonomy (pp. 3–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Doner, R. F., Ritchie, B. K., & Slater, D. (2005). Systemic vulnerability and the origins of developmental states: Northeast and Southeast Asia in comparative perspective. International Organization, 59(2), 327–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. B. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (Eds.). (1985). Bringing the state back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felker, G. (2009). The political economy of Southeast Asia. In M. Beeson (Ed.), Contemporary Southeast Asia (2nd ed., pp. 46–73). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, K. (2014). ASEAN’s engagement of civil society: Regulating dissent. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadiz, V. R. (2010). Localising power in post-authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadiz, V. R., & Robison, R. (2013). The political economy of oligarchy and the reorganization of power in Indonesia. Indonesia, 96, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S. (2004). Institutions and growth in East Asia. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(4), 53–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 1–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hameiri, S. (2009). Capacity and its fallacies: International state building as state transformation. Millennium, 38(1), 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hameiri, S., & Jones, L. (2015). Governing borderless threats: Non-traditional security and the politics of state transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hameiri, S., Hughes, H., & Scarpello, F. (2017). International intervention and local politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, S. (2010). The developmental state in the era of globalization: Beyond the Northeast Asian model of political economy. The Pacific Review, 23(1), 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgott, R., Robison, R., with Hewison, K. J, & Rodan, G. (1985). Theories of development and underdevelopment: Implications for the study of Southeast Asia. In R. Higgott & R. Robison (Eds.), Southeast Asia: Essays in the political economy of structural change (pp. 16–61). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C. (2003). The political economy of Cambodia’s transition, 1991–2001. London: RoutledgeCurzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C. (2009). Dependent communities: Aid and politics in Cambodia and East Timor. Ithaca: Cornell Southeast Asia Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, J., Hout, W., Hughes, C., & Robison, R. (2014). Political economy and the aid industry in Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • INFID. (2007, August). Profile of Indonesia’s foreign debt (Working paper). http://www.jubileeaustralia.org/LiteratureRetrieve.aspx?ID=22291. Accessed 18 Jan 2019.

  • Jayasuriya, K. (2005). Beyond institutional fetishism: From the developmental to the regulatory state. New Political Economy, 10(3), 381–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayasuriya, K., & Rodan, G. (2007). Beyond hybrid regimes: More participation, less contestation in Southeast Asia. Democratization, 14(5), 773–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1990). State theory: Putting the capitalist state in its place. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2008). State power: A strategic-relational approach. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2009). Avoiding traps, rescaling states, governing Europe. In R. Keil & R. Mahon (Eds.), Leviathan undone? Towards a political economy of scale (pp. 87–104). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jomo, K. S. (1997). Southeast Asia’s misunderstood miracle: Industrial policy and economic development in Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. (2010). (Post-)colonial statebuilding and state failure in East Timor: Bringing social conflict back in. Conflict, Security and Development, 19(3), 547–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. (2012). ASEAN, sovereignty and intervention in Southeast Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. (2014). The political economy of Myanmar’s transition. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 44(1), 144–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. (2015). Societies under siege: Exploring how international economic sanctions (do not) work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A. L., & Hewison, K. J. (2013). Precarious work and the challenge for Asia. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(3), 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legro, J. W. (2000). The transformation of policy ideas. American Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 419–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. Y. (2014). Singapore’s National Wages Council: An insider’s view. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2009). A theory of gradual institutional change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power (pp. 1–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, I. W., Mehrota, A. K., & Prasad, M. (Eds.). (2009). The new fiscal sociology: Taxation in comparative and historical perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848). Manifesto of the communist party. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2019.

  • Merkel, W., & Croissant, A. (2004). Conclusion: Good and defective democracies. Democratization, 11(5), 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migdal, J. S. (1988). Strong societies and weak states: State–society relations and state capabilities in the third world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. (1991). The limits of the state: Beyond statist approaches and their critics. American Political Science Review, 85(1), 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. (1966). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. D. (2018). Varieties of capitalism in Southeast Asia. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenbesser, L. (2016). Behind the façade: Elections under authoritarianism in Southeast Asia. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ottaway, M. (2003). Democracy challenged: The rise of semi-authoritarianism. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palan, R., Murphy, R., & Chavagneux, C. (2010). Tax havens: How globalization really works. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, G., & Theodore, N. (2007). Variegated capitalism. Progress in Human Geography, 31(6), 731–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepinsky, T. (2014). The institutional turn in comparative authoritarianism. British Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 631–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1957 [1944]). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulantzas, N. (1978). State, power, socialism. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rethel, L. (2010). The new financial development paradigm and Asian bond markets. New Political Economy, 15(4), 493–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M., & Higgott, R. (2000). Introduction: Asian crises and the myth of capitalist “convergence”. The Pacific Review, 13(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, N. (2003). The politics of Russia’s partial democracy. Political Studies Review, 1(2), 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robison, R. (1986). Indonesia: The rise of capital. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, R., & Hadiz, V. R. (2004). Reorganising power in Indonesia: The politics of oligarchy in an age of markets. New York: RoutledgeCurzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodan, G. (1989). The political economy of Singapore’s industrialization: National state and international capital. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodan, G. (2004). Transparency and authoritarian rule in Southeast Asia: Singapore and Malaysia. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rodan, G. (2016). Capitalism, inequality and ideology in Singapore: New challenges for the ruling party. Asian Studies Review, 40(2), 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodan, G. (2018). Participation without democracy: Containing conflict in Southeast Asia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rodan, G., & Hughes, C. (2014). The politics of accountability in Southeast Asia: The dominance of moral ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rodan, G., & Jayasuriya, K. (2012). Hybrid regimes: A social foundations approach. In J. Haynes (Ed.), Routledge handbook of democratization (pp. 175–189). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rodan, G., Hewison, K., & Robison, R. (2006). Theorising markets in Southeast Asia: Power and contestation. In G. Rodan, K. Hewison, & R. Robison (Eds.), The political economy of Southeast Asia Vol 3: Markets, power and contestation (pp. 1–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Routley, L. (2014). Developmental states in Africa? A review of ongoing debates and buzzwords. Development Policy Review, 32(2), 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeberg, M. (2014). Mapping deviant democracy. Democratization, 21(4), 634–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in: Strategies of analysis in current research. In P. B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, & T. Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the state back in (pp. 3–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, D. (2010). Ordering power: Contentious politics and authoritarian leviathans in Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, R. (2005). Rethinking Asia’s economic miracle: The political economy of war, prosperity, and crisis. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, R. (2009). What ever happened to the East Asian developmental state? The unfolding debate. The Pacific Review, 22(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K., & Steinmo, S. (1992). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth (Eds.), Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis (pp. 1–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurbon, E. (2016). Developmental mindset: The revival of financial activism in South Korea. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. H. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. H. (2018). The developmental state: Dead or alive? Development and Change, 49(2), 518–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, A. (2008). Governing finance: East Asia’s adoption of international standards. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, A., & Zhang, X. (Eds.). (2012). East Asian capitalism: Diversity, continuity, and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedeman, A. (2001). Development and corruption: The East Asian paradox. In E. T. Gomez (Ed.), Political business in East Asia (pp. 34–61). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. (1998). The myth of the powerless state. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A., & Glick Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1993). The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1997). World development report 1997: The state in a changing world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2002). World development report 2002: Building institutions for markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Political Science and International Studies, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia

    Shahar Hameiri

  2. School of Politics and International Relations, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

    Lee Jones

Authors
  1. Shahar Hameiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lee Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahar Hameiri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Asian and International Studies, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    Toby Carroll

  2. School of Political Science and International Studies, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia

    Shahar Hameiri

  3. School of Politics and International Relations, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

    Lee Jones

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hameiri, S., Jones, L. (2020). Theorising Political Economy in Southeast Asia. In: Carroll, T., Hameiri, S., Jones, L. (eds) The Political Economy of Southeast Asia. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28255-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation