Skip to main content

Neural Correlates of Dual Decision Processes: A Network-Based Meta-analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems and Neuroscience

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 32))

Abstract

It is well-received that human decision mechanism involves two processes: intuition and deliberation, which is also known as faster system 1 and slower system 2. A large volume of research has used this mechanism to interpret human decision behavior and the activation of associated bran regions in different scenarios. Recently, a trend of brain image research is to focus not on the role of individual brain areas but on the network of area connectivity. The purpose of this research is hence to explore how different brain regions are connected when these different decision processes are activated. In particular, we conduct a meta-analysis to build new knowledge on existing published primary research to construct neural networks associated with these dual processes. The social network analysis is used for this meta-analysis and results will be reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lieberman, M. D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D. T., & Trope, Y. (2002). Reflection and reflexion: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 199–249.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Evans, J. (1984). Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 451–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuo, W. J., Sjöström, T., Chen, Y. P., Wang, Y. H., & Huang, C. Y. (2009). Intuition and deliberation: Two systems for strategizing in the brain. Science, 324(5926), 519–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Phelps, E. A., Lempert, K. M., & Sokol-Hessner, P. (2014). Emotion and decision making: Multiple modulatory neural circuits. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 37, 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Evans, J. (2008). Dual processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Farrell, A. M., Goh, J. O., & White, B. J. (2014). The effect of performance-based incentive contracts on system 1 and system 2 processing in affective contexts: fMRI and behavioral evidence. The Accounting Review., 89(6), 1979–2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wig, G. S., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2011). Concepts and principles in the analysis of brain networks. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1224, 126–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bassett, D. S., & Sporns, O. (2017). Network neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Den Heuvel, M. P., & Pol, H. E. H. (2010). Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 20, 519–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mears, D., & Pollard, H. B. (2016). Network science and the human brain: Using graph theory to understand the brain and one of its hubs, the amygdala in health and disease. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 94, 590–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of ROC under the grant #103-2410-H-110-083 -MY2 and Research Center Grant from The Ministry of Education of ROC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ting-Peng Liang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liang, TP., Chou, YC., Liu, CH. (2020). Neural Correlates of Dual Decision Processes: A Network-Based Meta-analysis. In: Davis, F., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, PM., Randolph, A., Fischer, T. (eds) Information Systems and Neuroscience. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 32. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28144-1_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics