Skip to main content

Identifying Socio-Technical Means to Support Small Loosely Coupled Groups of Volunteers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing (CRIWG+CollabTech 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11677))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1140 Accesses

Abstract

Volunteers provide a large variety of valuable services to society spanning from local community efforts to global non-profit organizations and online communities. While larger volunteer groups and online communities in particular have been studied extensively, there is a lack of research on small loosely coupled volunteer groups especially with respect to the way they collaborate to organize activities. Our work attempts to shed light onto such groups. In this paper, we present results from an exploratory study of five student organizations. Based on a literature analysis we developed an interview protocol and corresponding coding scheme that allowed us to analyse how such groups cooperate and how they use technology to communicate and organize activities. Our findings indicate areas of improvement around higher levels of transparency, well defined procedures, effective knowledge management and exchange between similar groups. We discuss these potentials and propose an initial socio-technical conceptualization to overcome current issues and support collaboration in such groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Volunteer + {collaboration, team, work, organization, participation, sustainability, retention, turnover}, loosely coupled collaboration, ad-hoc teams, flash teams.

  2. 2.

    The full interview protocol can be retrieved from the authors upon request.

References

  1. Alavi, M., Leidner, D.E.: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Q. 25, 107–136 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, C.N.: Under-represented college students and extracurricular involvement: the effects of various student organizations on academic performance. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 11(3), 273–298 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boulus-Rødje, N., Bjorn, P.: Design challenges in supporting distributed knowledge: an examination of organizing elections. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3137–3146. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cataldo, M., Herbsleb, J.D.: Communication networks in geographically distributed software development. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 579–588. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chevrier, F., et al.: Factors affecting satisfaction among community-based hospice volunteer visitors. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Med. 11(4), 30–37 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Clary, E.G., et al.: Volunteers’ motivations: a functional strategy for the recruitment, placement, and retention of volunteers. Nonprofit Manag. Leadersh. 2(4), 333–350 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clegg, C.W.: Sociotechnical principles for system design. Appl. Ergon. 31(5), 463–477 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cobb, C., et al.: Designing for the deluge: understanding & supporting the distributed, collaborative work of crisis volunteers. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 888–899. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen, J.: Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol. Bull. 70(4), 213 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Crowston, K., et al.: Self-organization of teams for free/libre open source software development. Inf. Softw. Technol. 49(6), 564–575 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Crowston, K., Howison, J.: A ten-year retrospective. Hum.-Comput. Interact. Manag. Inf. Syst. Found. 120 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cuskelly, G., et al.: Volunteer management practices and volunteer retention: a human resource management approach. Sport Manag. Rev. 9(2), 141–163 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dennerlein, S., et al.: Web 2.0 messaging tools for knowledge management? Exploring the potentials of slack. In: European Conference on Knowledge Management, p. 225. Academic Conferences International Limited (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dourish, P., Bellotti, V.: Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 107–114. ACM (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dumas, M., et al.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Farmer, S.M., Fedor, D.B.: Volunteer participation and withdrawal. Nonprofit Manag. Leadersh. 9(4), 349–368 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Farrell, J.M., et al.: Volunteer motivation, satisfaction, and management at an elite sporting competition. J. Sport Manag. 12(4), 288–300 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fischer, G., Herrmann, T.: Socio-technical systems: a meta-design perspective. Int. J. Sociotechnology Knowl. Dev. IJSKD. 3(1), 1–33 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Galindo-Kuhn, R., Guzley, R.M.: The volunteer satisfaction index. J. Soc. Serv. Res. 28(1), 45–68 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Garner, J.T., Garner, L.T.: Volunteering an opinion: organizational voice and volunteer retention in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 40(5), 813–828 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gross, T., et al.: User-centred awareness in computer-supported cooperative work-systems: structured embedding of findings from social sciences. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 18(3), 323–360 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grudin, J.: Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 1988 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 85–93. ACM (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harrison, D.A.: Volunteer motivation and attendance decisions: competitive theory testing in multiple samples from a homeless shelter. J. Appl. Psychol. 80(3), 371 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Haski-Leventhal, D., Bargal, D.: The volunteer stages and transitions model: organizational socialization of volunteers. Hum. Relat. 61(1), 67–102 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Herrmann, T., et al.: Evaluating socio-technical systems with heuristics - a feasible approach? In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Socio-Technical Perspective in IS Development (STPIS 2016), pp. 91–97. CEUR-WS (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hibbert, S., et al.: Understanding volunteer motivation for participation in a community-based food cooperative. Int. J. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Mark. 8(1), 30–42 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Karr, L.B., Meijs, L.C.P.M.: Sustaining the motivation to volunteer in organizations. In: Fetchenhauer, D., Flache, A., Buunk, B., Lindenberg, S. (eds.) Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior. Critical Issues in Social Justice, pp. 157–172. Springer, Boston (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28032-4_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kraut, R., et al.: Dealing with newcomers. Evid. Soc. Des. Min. Soc. Sci. Build Online Communities 1, 42 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 159–174 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lee, M., et al.: Bots mind the social-technical gap. In: Proceedings of 15th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work-Exploratory Papers. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liao, Q.V., et al.: Improvising harmony: opportunities for technologies to support crowd orchestration. Urbana 51, 61801 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lin, B., et al.: Why developers are slacking off: understanding how software teams use slack. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion, pp. 333–336. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Malone, T.W., Crowston, K.: The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surv. CSUR. 26(1), 87–119 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Malone, T.W., Crowston, K.: What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? In: Proceedings of the 1990 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 357–370. ACM (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mumford, E.: Effective Systems Design and Requirements and Analysis - the ETHICS aproach. Macmillan Press LTD, Houndsmill, Basingstoke, Hampshire and London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nolte, A.: Exploring potentials of process reflection to support communities of small volunteer groups. In: Workshops and Work-in-Progress Contributions at S-BPM ONE 2018. CEUR-WS (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nolte, A., et al.: Supporting collaboration in small volunteer groups with socio-technical guidelines. In: Proceedings of 16th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work - Exploratory Papers, Reports of the European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Omoto, A.M., Snyder, M.: Considerations of community: the context and process of volunteerism. Am. Behav. Sci. 45(5), 846–867 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pearce, J.L.: Volunteers: The Organizational Behavior of Unpaid Workers. Routledge, Abingdon (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Peterson, D.K.: Recruitment strategies for encouraging participation in corporate volunteer programs. J. Bus. Ethics. 49(4), 371–386 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C.: Designing for loose coupling in mobile groups. In: Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 75–84. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Qiu, H.S., et al.: Going farther together: the impact of social capital on sustained participation in open source. In: International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ransbotham, S., Kane, G.C.: Membership turnover and collaboration success in online communities: explaining rises and falls from grace in Wikipedia. Mis Q., 613–627 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Retelny, D., et al.: Expert crowdsourcing with flash teams. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 75–85. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Saeed, S., et al.: Analyzing political activists’ organization practices: findings from a long term case study of the european social forum. Comput. Support. Coop. Work CSCW 20(4–5), 265–304 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Schmidt, K.: Riding a tiger, or computer supported cooperative work. In: Bannon, L., Robinson, M., Schmidt, K. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW ’91., pp. 1–16. Springer, Dordrecht (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3506-1_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. Valentine, M.A., et al.: Flash organizations: crowdsourcing complex work by structuring crowds as organizations. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3523–3537. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Voida, A., et al.: Homebrew databases: complexities of everyday information management in nonprofit organizations. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 915–924. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wang, L.S., et al.: Searching for the goldilocks zone: trade-offs in managing online volunteer groups. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 989–998. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Slack. https://slack.com/

  52. Social Kitchen - the Other Person. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/inpictures/2015/09/greece-social-kitchen-person-150921110028671.html

  53. SUDS. http://suds-cmu.org/

  54. Wikipedia. https://www.wikipedia.org/

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. Nolte’s contributions to this research were partially funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under grant no. NO 1302/1-1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Nolte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nolte, A., Farzan, R. (2019). Identifying Socio-Technical Means to Support Small Loosely Coupled Groups of Volunteers. In: Nakanishi, H., Egi, H., Chounta, IA., Takada, H., Ichimura, S., Hoppe, U. (eds) Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing. CRIWG+CollabTech 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11677. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28011-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28011-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28010-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28011-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics