Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Examining Unequal Gender Distribution in Software Engineering

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement (EuroSPI 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1060))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper investigates the biological, psychological and societal reasoning for the disparity of females in the software engineering industry and how a more diverse workforce can have an advantage in this sector. Studies show that diversity in a company positively correlates to its financial profits. Furthermore, a severe lack of women in software engineering causes companies to limit themselves to smaller talent pools, decrease the creative outlook on fresh ideas and resolution of problems. There are superficially inherent reasons why computing appeals to men more than women, observations in multiple reports suggest that men may have a small advantage when it comes to mathematical and problem-solving skills. Additionally, it is elsewhere suggested that females interests reside in other fields related to ‘people’, whereas males are generally more interested in ‘things’. However, while societal factors and bias plays a role in the discouragement of women from the software engineering industry, studies have shown that countries with more gender-inegalitarian societies show an increase in the number of women in software engineering and STEM. This may imply that gender disparity in software engineering primarily emerges from personal choice rather than any discrimination or stereotyping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hilton, T., Berglund, G.: Sex differences in mathematics achievement: a longitudinal study. J. Educ. Res. 67(5), 231–237 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lippa, R.A.: Gender differences in personality and interests: when, where, and why? Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 4(11), 1098–1110 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gurer, D., Camp, T.: An ACM-W literature review on women in computing. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 43(2), 121–127 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gallagher, A.M., De Lisi, R., Holst, P.C., McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A.V., Morely, M., Calahan, C.: Gender differences in advanced mathematical problem solving. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 75(3), 165–190 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: Changing situational contexts present a constant challenge to software developers. In: O’Connor, R., Umay Akkaya, M., Kemaneci, K., Yilmaz, M., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. CCIS, vol. 543, pp. 100–111. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24647-5_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Benbow, C., Stanley, J.: Sex differences in mathematical ability: fact or artifact? Science 210(4475), 1262–1264 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stereotype threat and the software industry gender gap. https://spin.atomicobject.com/2012/08/01/women-and-the-software-industry-the-truth-about-stereotypes-retention-and-the-gender-gap/. Accessed 04 Mar 2019

  8. Atan, H.: Computers in distance education: gender differences in self-perceived computer competencies. J. Educ. Media 27(3), 123 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shotick, J., Stephens, P.R.: Gender inequities of self-efficacy on task-specific computer applications in business. J. Educ. Bus. 81(5), 269–273 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Why does India have a higher percentage of women in tech than the UK? https://www.computerweekly.com/news/252437742/Why-does-India-have-a-higher-percentage-of-women-in-tech-than-the-UK. Accessed 28 Feb 2019

  11. 2016 SAT test results confirm pattern that’s persisted for 50 years - high school boys are better at math than girls. http://www.aei.org/publication/2016-sat-test-results-confirm-pattern-thats-persisted-for-45-years-high-school-boys-are-better-at-math-than-girls/. Accessed 20 Feb 2019

  12. State examinations statistics. https://www.examinations.ie/statistics/?l=en&mc=st&sc=r15. Accessed 28 Feb 2019

  13. Women in computer science. https://www.computerscience.org/resources/women-in-computer-science/. Accessed 25 Feb 2019

  14. Technology skills 2022 Ireland’s third ICT skills action plan. https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Policy-Reports/technology-skills-2022.pdf. Accessed 06 Mar 2019

  15. Stoet, G., Geary, D.C.: The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychol. Sci. 29(4), 581–593 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldin, C., Katz, L.F.: The power of the pill: oral contraceptives and women’s career and marriage decisions. J. Polit. Econ. 110, 730–770 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tenenbaum, H.R.: You’d be good at that: gender patterns in parent-child talk about courses. Soc. Dev. 18, 447–463 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gürer, D.: Women in computing history. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 34(2), 116–120 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Frenkel, A.M.: Women and computing. Commun. ACM 33(11), 34–46 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Whitecraft, M.A., Williams, W.M.: Making Software. O’Reilly Media, Surrey (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sáinz, M., Eccles, J.: Self-concept of computer and math ability: Gender implications across time and within ICT studies. J. Vocat. Behav. 80(2), 486–499 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morse, T.E.: Ensuring equality of educational opportunity in the digital age. Sage J. 36(3), 266–279 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jordan peterson interview. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZYQpge1W5s. Accessed 01 Mar 2019

  24. Women in wartime: the rise of the female public servant. https://www.theguardian.com/public-leaders-network/2014/nov/08/world-war-women-workplace-public-services. Accessed 02 Mar 2019

  25. Perry, D.G., Adam, J., White, A.J., Perry, L.C.: Does early sex typing result from children’s attempts to match their behavior to sex role stereotypes? Child Dev. 55(6), 2114–2121 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Women in computer sciences: closing the gender gap in higher education. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/gendergap/www/. Accessed 06 Mar 2019

  27. Women and IT by the numbers. http://www.ncwit.org/sites/default/files/resources/2012bythenumbers_web.pdf. Accessed 04 Mar 2019

  28. Beede, D.N., Julian, T.A., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., Doms, M.E.: Women in STEM: a gender gap to innovation. Economics and Statistics Administration Issue Brief No. 04-11 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. The first 1940s coders were women–so how did tech bros take over? https://www.history.com/news/coding-used-to-be-a-womans-job-so-it-was-paid-less-and-undervalued. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  30. McKinsey report. https://assets.mckinsey.com/~/media/857F440109AA4D13A54D9C496D86ED58.ashx. Accessed 20 Feb 2019

  31. Creating cultures where all engineers thrive. https://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/creating-cultures-where-all-engineers-thrive. Accessed 21 Feb 2019

  32. Delivering through diversity. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/organization/our%20insights/delivering%20through%20diversity/delivering-through-diversity_full-report.ashx. Accessed 20 Feb 2019

  33. Light, J.S.: When computers were women. Technol. Cult. 40(3), 455–483 (1999)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Cardia, E.: Household Technology: Was it the Engine of Liberation? 2nd edn. Society for Economic Dynamics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lennan, W.: Labour Force Australia 1978-95 (6204.0). Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Teague, G.J.: Women in computing: what brings them to it, what keeps them in it? GATES 5(1), 45–59 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Raghuram, P.: Migrant women in male-dominated sectors of the labour market: a research agenda. Popul. Space Place 14, 43–57 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Prescott, J., Bogg, J.: Segregation in a male-dominated industry: women working in the computer games industry. Int. J. Gender Sci. Technol. 3(1), 206–227 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  39. The Computer Girls: 1967 Cosmo article highlights women in technology. https://www.siliconrepublic.com/people/women-in-technology-the-computer-girls-cosmopolitan. Accessed 03 Mar 2019

  40. Irish IT profile (2018). https://www.ics.ie/news/Irish_IT_Profile_2018. Accessed 04 Mar 2019

  41. Medel, P., Pournaghshband, V.: Eliminating gender bias in computer science education materials. In: ACM 2017, pp. 411–416 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Smyth, F.L., Nosek, B.A.: On the gender–science stereotypes held by scientists: explicit accord with gender-ratios, implicit accord with scientific identity. Front. Psychol. 6, 415 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Verbick, T.: Woman, technology, and gender bias. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 17(3), 240–250 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, M.T., Degol, J.L.: Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 29(1), 119–140 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Othman, M., Latih, R.: Women in computer science: No shortage here! Commun. ACM 49(3), 111–114 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. The story of lena, the famous test image. http://visionexperiments.blogspot.com/2010/06/story-of-lenna-famous-test-image.html. Accessed 04 Mar 2019

  47. Moradi, B., Huang, Y.P.: Objectification theory and psychology of women: a decade of advances and future directions. Psychol. Women Q. 32(4), 377–398 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. The truth about sex differences. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/201711/the-truth-about-sex-differences. Accessed 25 Feb 2019

  49. The more gender equality, the fewer women in STEM. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/02/the-more-gender-equality-the-fewer-women-in-stem/553592/. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  50. Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V., Leavy, B., Yilmaz, M.: Exploring the relationship between software process adaptive capability and organisational performance. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 41(12), 1169–1183 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sauberer, G., Riel, A., Messnarz, R.: Diversity and PERMA-nent positive leadership to benefit from industry 4.0 and kondratieff 6.0. In: Stolfa, J., Stolfa, S., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2017. CCIS, vol. 748, pp. 642–652. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  52. Clarke, P.M., et al.: Refactoring software development process terminology through the use of ontology. In: Kreiner, C., O’Connor, R.V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2016. CCIS, vol. 633, pp. 47–57. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44817-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  53. Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V., Leavy, B.: A complexity theory viewpoint on the software development process and situational context. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and Systems Process (ICSSP), Co-Located with the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 86–90 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2904354.2904369

  54. Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: The situational factors that affect the software development process: towards a comprehensive reference framework. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(5), 433–447 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Nevalainen, R., Clarke, P., McCaffery, F., O’Connor, R.V., Varkoi, T.: Situational factors in safety critical software development. In: Kreiner, C., O’Connor, R.V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2016. CCIS, vol. 633, pp. 132–147. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44817-6_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  56. Marks, G., O’Connor, R.V., Clarke, P.M.: The impact of situational context on the software development process – a case study of a highly innovative start-up organization. In: Mas, A., Mesquida, A., O’Connor, R.V., Rout, T., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2017. CCIS, vol. 770, pp. 455–466. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  57. Clarke, P.M., et al.: Exploring software process variation arising from differences in situational context. In: Stolfa, J., Stolfa, S., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2017. CCIS, vol. 748, pp. 29–42. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  58. Rashid, M., Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: A systematic examination of knowledge loss in open source software projects. Int. J. Inf. Manag. (IJIM) 46, 104–123 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Rashid, M., Clarke, P.M., O’Connor, R.V.: Exploring knowledge loss in open source software (OSS) projects. In: Mas, A., Mesquida, A., O’Connor, R.V., Rout, T., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2017. CCIS, vol. 770, pp. 481–495. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported, in part, by Science Foundation Ireland grant 13/RC/2094 to Lero - the Irish Software Research Centre (www.lero.ie).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computing, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland

    Alex Murphy, Ben Kelly, Kai Bergmann, Kyrylo Khaletskyy, Rory V. O’Connor & Paul M. Clarke

  2. Lero, The Irish Software Research Center, Dublin, Ireland

    Rory V. O’Connor & Paul M. Clarke

Authors
  1. Alex Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ben Kelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kai Bergmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kyrylo Khaletskyy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rory V. O’Connor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Paul M. Clarke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul M. Clarke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Lorit Consultancy, Edinburgh, UK

    Alastair Walker

  2. School of Computing, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland

    Rory V. O'Connor

  3. I.S.C.N. GesmbH, Graz, Austria

    Richard Messnarz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Murphy, A., Kelly, B., Bergmann, K., Khaletskyy, K., O’Connor, R.V., Clarke, P.M. (2019). Examining Unequal Gender Distribution in Software Engineering. In: Walker, A., O'Connor, R., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1060. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28005-5_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28005-5_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28004-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28005-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation