Skip to main content

A Brief Historical Overview of Political Campaigning: Theories, Concepts, and Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Thirty Years of Political Campaigning in Central and Eastern Europe

Part of the book series: Political Campaigning and Communication ((PCC))

Abstract

The chapter recapitulates the development of campaigning during the twentieth century, and it reflects changes in the nature of relationships among political parties and their voters. The discussion starts with Stein Rokkan’s concept of cleavages (which explains the origin of political parties in most European countries) and his finding about ‘freezing of the party systems’. In the first phase, voter loyalty was high; the overall purpose of party communication was to mobilise support at the right time. After WWII and the expansion of television, however, the situation changed. Voting became more individualised, and ideology became less important (at least for some) than image. Political parties also changed their approach to communication in this period: more customer-oriented and open to hiring polling, advertising, and other professionals to help with campaign planning, testing and execution. The purpose of campaigning broadened as well: besides the mobilisation of core voters, it aimed to persuade undecided and/or swing voters. The second part of the chapter explores concepts connected with campaigning which are important in understanding (post)modern political campaigns to serve as a basis for the understanding of the country case studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A leader and their personal traits can serve as heuristic, which facilitates the decision-making process (for a general discussion on heuristics in politics, see Lau 2003; cf. Popkin 1991; Lau and Redlawsk 2001; Lefevere 2011; McGraw 2000, 345–346; Sniderman et al. 1991, 19; Lupia 1994 and others).

    Even a quick look at a candidate provides a voter with complex information about the candidate (like gender, age, race, overall likeability, etc.) and, in some cases, even about their political positions and competencies for holding office (in cases where the voter knows their party affiliation or simply based on stereotypes) (Fershtman et al. 2005; Rödin and Özcan 2013; Castillo and Petrie 2010; Schubert et al. 2011; Banducci et al. 2003; Buckley et al. 2007; Todorov et al. 2005).

References

  • Adam, Silke, and Michaela Maier. 2010. Personalization of Politics A Critical Review and Agenda for Research. Annals of the International Communication Association 34 (1): 213–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2010.11679101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banducci, Susan, Michael Trasher, Colin Rallings, and Jeffrey Karp. 2003. Candidate Appearance Cues in Low-Information Elections. Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. http://www.jkarp.com/pdf/apsa_2003.pdf.

  • Blumler, Jay G., and Dennis Kavanagh. 1999. The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features. Political Communication 16 (3): 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, Fiona, Neil Collins, and Theresa Reidy. 2007. Ballot Paper Photographs and Low-Information Elections in Ireland. Politics 27 (3): 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2007.00297.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, Marco, and Ragan Petrie. 2010. Discrimination in the Lab: Does Information Trump Appearance? Games and Economic Behavior 68 (1): 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2009.04.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, John, and Charles Lamb. 1986. Marketing Government and Social Services. Chichester: Willey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibl, Otto. 2016. Cesta k (experimentálnímu) výzkumu efektů osobnostní stránky politiky pod jednou konceptuální střechou: metodologická poznámka k výzkumu personalizace. European Electoral Studies 11 (1): 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fershtman, Chaim, Uri Gneezy, and Frank Verboven. 2005. Discrimination and Nepotism: The Efficiency of the Anonymity Rule. The Journal of Legal Studies 34 (2): 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1086/429846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, Rachel K., and Andrea Römmele. 2009. Measuring the Professionalization of Political Campaigning. Party Politics 15 (3): 265–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068809102245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, Daniel C., and Paolo Mancini. 2004. Americanization, Globalization, Secularization: Understanding the Convergence of Media Systems and Political Communication. In Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges, ed. Frank Esser and Barbara Pfetsch, 25–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henneberg, Stephan. 2006. Leading or Following? A Theoretical Analysis of Political Marketing Postures. Journal of Political Marketing 5 (3): 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1300/J199v05n03_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henneberg, Stephan, Margaret Scammell, and Nicholas O’Shaughnessy. 2009. Political Marketing Management and Theories of Democracy. Marketing Theory 9 (2): 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593109103060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karvonen, Lauri. 2010. The Personalisation of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, Robert J. 1960. The Marketing Revolution. Journal of Marketing 24 (3): 35–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, Stanley. 1956. Professional Public Relations and Political Power. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchheimer, Otto. 1966. The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems. In Political Parties and Political Development, ed. Joseph LaPalombra and Myron Weiner, 177–200. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Richard. 2003. Models of Decision-Making. In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. David Sears, Leonie Huddy, and Robert Jervis, 19–59. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Richard, and David Redlawsk. 2001. Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making. American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 951–971. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees-Marshment, Jennifer. 2001. The Marriage of Politics and Marketing. Political Studies 49 (4): 692–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefevere, Jonas. 2011. Campaign Effects on Voter Decision Making. PhD diss., University of Antwerp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilleker, Darren. 2006. Key Concepts in Political Communication. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Martin S., and Stein Rokkan. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupia, Arthur. 1994. Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections. The American Political Science Review 88 (1): 63–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/2944882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maarek, Phillipe. 2011. Campaign Communication & Political Marketing. Chichester: Willey-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, Gianpietro, and Winfried Schulz. 1999. “Mediatization” of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy? Political Communication 16 (3): 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, Ian. 2015. The Personalization of Politics in Australia. Party Politics 27 (3): 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813487111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, Kathleen M. 2000. Contributions of the Cognitive Approach to Political Psychology. Political Psychology 21 (4): 805–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa. 2000. The Evolution of Campaign Communication. In A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Post-Industrial Societies, ed. Pippa Norris, 137–161. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pruysers, Scott, William P. Cross, and Richard S. Katz. 2018. Personalism, Personalization and Party Politics. In The Personalization of Democratic Politics and the Challenge for Political Parties, ed. William P. Cross, Richard S. Katz, and Scott Pruysers. London: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahat, Gideon, and Tamir Sheafer. 2007. The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949–2003. Political Communication 24 (1): 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600601128739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, David. 1988. Marketing the Political Product. European Journal of Marketing 22 (9): 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rödin, Magnus, and Gulay Özcan. 2013. Is It How You Look or Speak That Matters?: An Experimental Study Exploring the Mechanisms of Ethnic Discrimination. Working Papers 009, Bahcesehir University, Betam. https://ideas.repec.org/p/bae/wpaper/009.html.

  • Schubert, James N., Margaret A. Curran, and Carmen Strungaru. 2011. Physical Attractiveness, Issue Agreement, and Assimilation Effects in Candidate Appraisal. Politics and the Life Sciences 30 (1): 33–49. https://doi.org/10.2990/30_1_33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shama, Avraham. 1976. The Marketing of Political Candidates. Academy of Marketing Science 4 (4): 764–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman, Paul, Richard Brody, and Phillip Tetlock. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, David L. 2004. Transnational Trends in Political Communication: Conventional Views and New Realities. In Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges, ed. Frank Esser and Barbara Pfetsch, 45–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, David, and Paolo Mancini. 1996. Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen, Jacques. 2005. Introduction. In The European Voter, ed. Jacques Thomassen, 1–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, Alexander, Anesu Mandisodza, Amir Goren, and Crystal Hall. 2005. Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes. Science 308 (5728): 1623–1626. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1110589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wring, Dominic. 1996. Political Marketing and Party Development in Britain: A “Secret” History. European Journal of Marketing 30 (10/11): 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569610149818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Otto Eibl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Eibl, O., Gregor, M. (2019). A Brief Historical Overview of Political Campaigning: Theories, Concepts, and Approaches. In: Eibl, O., Gregor, M. (eds) Thirty Years of Political Campaigning in Central and Eastern Europe. Political Campaigning and Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27693-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics