Abstract
Temporal data may be precise or imprecise. Representing and reasoning about these kinds of data in ontology still needs to be addressed. A significant number of approaches exist. However, they handle only precise temporal data and lack imprecise ones. In this paper, we propose a crisp-based approach for representing and reasoning about temporal data in term of quantitative (i.e., time points that can be dates and clocks, and time intervals) as well as qualitative relations (e.g., “before”) in ontology. It aims to support not only precise time points and intervals, but also imprecise ones e.g., “The journey starts by the beginning of June and ends by mid-June”. It relies only on crisp exiting Semantic Web standards and it is modeled in crisp ontology. Our approach is based on three blocks. (i) We extend the 4D-fluents approach with new crisp ontological components to represent the mentioned precise and imprecise temporal data. (ii) We extend the Allen’s interval algebra to reason about imprecise time intervals. Compared to related work, our extension is entirely based on crisp set theory. The resulting interval relations preserve many of the desirable properties of the original algebra. We adapt these relations to allow relating a time interval and a time point, and two time points; where time points and intervals may be both precise or both imprecise. All proposed relations can be used for temporal reasoning by means of transitivity tables. (iii) We propose an OWL 2 ontology based on our extensions. It proposes a set of SWRL rules to infer the proposed qualitative temporal relations. A prototype based on this ontology is implemented. We apply our approach to the Travel ontology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
References
Allen, J.: Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Commun. ACM 26, 832–843 (1983)
Anagnostopoulos, E., Batsakis, S., Petrakis, E.: CHRONOS: a reasoning engine for qualitative temporal information in OWL. Procedia Comput. Sci. 22, 70–77 (2013)
Artale, A., Franconi, E.: A survey of temporal extensions of description logics. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 30, 70–77 (2000)
Badaloni, S., Giacomin, M.: The algebra IAfuz: a framework for qualitative fuzzy temporal reasoning. Artif. Intell. 170(10), 872–908 (2006)
Batsakis, S., Petrakis, E.G.M.: SOWL: a framework for handling spatio-temporal information in OWL 2.0. In: Bassiliades, N., Governatori, G., Paschke, A. (eds) Rule-Based Reasoning, Programming, and Applications. RuleML 2011. LNCS, vol. 6826, pp. 242–249. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22546-8_19
Buneman, P., Kostylev, E.: Annotation algebras for RDFS. In: Workshop on the Role of Semantic Web in Provenance Management (2010)
Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Processing fuzzy temporal knowledge. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 19(4), 729–744 (1989)
Ermolayev, V., et al.: An agent-oriented model of a dynamic engineering design process. In: Kolp, M., Bresciani, P., Henderson-Sellers, B., Winikoff, M. (eds.) AOIS -2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3529, pp. 168–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11916291_12
Freksa, C.: Temporal reasoning based on semi-intervals. Artif. Intell. 54, 199–227 (1992)
Gammoudi, A., Hadjali, A.: Fuzz-TIME: an intelligent system for managing fuzzy temporal information. Intell. Comput. Cybern. 10, 200–222 (2017)
Ghorbel, F., Hamdi, F., Métais, E., Ellouze, N., Gargouri, F.: A fuzzy-based approach for representing and reasoning on imprecise time intervals in fuzzy-owl 2 ontology. In: Silberztein, M., Atigui, F., Kornyshova, E., Métais, E., Meziane, F. (eds.) NLDB 2018. LNCS, vol. 10859, pp. 167–178. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91947-8_17
Gutierrez, C., Hurtado, C., Vaisman, A.: Temporal RDF. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 93–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11431053_7
Harbelot, B.A.: Continuum: a spatiotemporal data model to represent and qualify filiation relationships. In: ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop, pp. 76–85 (2013)
Herradi, N.: A Semantic Representation of Time Intervals in OWL2. KEOD, pp. 1–8 (2017)
Hurtado, C., Vaisman, A.: Reasoning with temporal constraints in RDF. In: Alferes, J.J., Bailey, J., May, W., Schwertel, U. (eds.) PPSWR 2006. LNCS, vol. 4187, pp. 164–178. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11853107_12
Kim, S.-K., Song, M.-Y., Kim, C., Yea, S.-J., Jang, H.C., Lee, K.-C.: Temporal ontology language for representing and reasoning interval-based temporal knowledge. In: Domingue, J., Anutariya, C. (eds.) ASWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5367, pp. 31–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89704-0_3
Klein, M.C.: Ontology versioning on the semantic web. In: Semantic Web Working Symposium, Stanford University, pp. 75–91. California (2001)
Lutz, C.: Description logics with concrete domains. In: Advances in Modal Logic, pp. 265–296 (2003)
Nagypál, G., Motik, B.: A fuzzy model for representing uncertain, subjective, and vague temporal knowledge in ontologies. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Schmidt, D.C. (eds.) OTM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2888, pp. 906–923. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39964-3_57
Noy, N.R.: Defining N-Ary Relations on the Semantic-Web. W3C Working Group (2006)
O’Connor, M.J., Das, A.K.: A method for representing and querying temporal information in OWL. In: Fred, A., Filipe, J., Gamboa, H. (eds.) BIOSTEC 2010. CCIS, vol. 127, pp. 97–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18472-7_8
Sadeghi, K.M.: Uncertain interval algebra via fuzzy/probabilistic modeling. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 591–598 (2014)
Tappolet, J., Bernstein, A.: Applied temporal RDF: efficient temporal querying of RDF data with SPARQL. In: Aroyo, L., et al. (eds.) ESWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5554, pp. 308–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02121-3_25
Vilain, M.B.: Constraint propagation algorithms for temporal reasoning. In: National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 377–382. Philadelphia (1986)
Welty, C., Fikes, R.: A reusable ontology for fluents in OWL. In: FOIS, pp. 226–336 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Achich, N., Ghorbel, F., Hamdi, F., Metais, E., Gargouri, F. (2019). Representing and Reasoning About Precise and Imprecise Time Points and Intervals in Semantic Web: Dealing with Dates and Time Clocks. In: Hartmann, S., Küng, J., Chakravarthy, S., Anderst-Kotsis, G., Tjoa, A., Khalil, I. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11707. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27618-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27618-8_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27617-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27618-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)