Abstract
In the current period of scientific and technological progress, new concepts, tools and methods of solution must fulfill the principles of a democratic society that dictate us to ensure the quality of the human environment for future generations. Part of this challenging task is the timely assessment of the potential impacts of the proposed activity on the environment and public health with acceptable environmental risk. For this reason, it is necessary to develop the theory and to apply the methods for the systematic investigation of the consequences of projects, constructions, plants, facilities and other interventions on the environment and the population. The aim of the paper is to analyze the current state of the impact assessment process and to point out the existing methods used in the impact assessment process. The work points out the possibility of improving existing methods of impact assessment of proposed activities by applying risk analysis in the process of applying the impact of water structures on the environment. The use of risk analysis methods to assess the impact of activities on the environment and population health is undoubtedly an original and innovative proposal. The paper has a clearly defined original methodology and solution concept.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al-Agha MR, Mortaja RS (2005) Desalination in the Gaza Strip: drinking water supply and environmental impact. Desalination 173(2):157–171
Bond AJ, Morrison-Saunders A (2011) Re-evaluating sustainability assessment: aligning the vision and the practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev 31(1):1–7
Bond A, Pope J (2012) The state of the art of impact assessment in 2012. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 30(1):1–4
Cashmore M, Bond A, Sadler B (2009) Introduction: the effectiveness of impact assessment instruments. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 27(2):91–93
Demidova O, Cherp A (2005) Risk assessment for improved treatment of health considerations in EIA. Environ Impact Assess Rev 25(4):411–429
Gałaś S (2014) Assessment of the quality of the environment in the v4 countries. AGH Univ Sci & Technol, Krakow, Poland, p 2014
Hapciuc OE, Romanescu G, Minea I, Iosub M, Enea A, Sandu I (2016) Flood susceptibility analysis of the cultural heritage in the Sucevita catchment (Romania). Int J Conserv Sci 7(2):501–510
Mesaros P, Mandicak T, Behun M (2018) Applications of knowledge technology in construction industry. In: 16th international conference on emerging eLearning technologies and applications (ICETA). Stary Smokovec, Slovakia
Satrapa L, Fosumpaur P, Horsky M (2010) Experience in assessing the design of land consolidation project focusing on flood protection. In: Conference on landscape engineering 2011. Praha, Czech Republic
Slezingr M, Foltynova L, Zelenakova M (2010) Assessment of the current condition of riparian and accompanying stands. In: Colloquium on Landscape Management, Mendel Univ. Brno, pp 24–27
Tamura H, Fujita S, Hiroshi K (1994) Decision analysis for environmental impact assessment and consensus formation among conflicting multiple agents - including case studies for road traffic. Sci Total Environ 153(3):203–210
Wang YM, Yan JB, Xu DL (2006) Environmental impact assessment using evidential reasoning approach. Eur J Oper Res 174(3):1885–1913
Zeleňáková M, Zvijáková L, Gaňová L (2014) Environmental impact study Bodva river basin Water resources and wetlands. In: 2nd international conference, Tulcea, Romania, 11–13 September 2014. Transversal publishing house, Targoviste, pp 329–335
Zeleňáková M, Zvijáková L (2017a) Risk analysis within environmental impact assessment of proposed construction activity. Environ Impact Assess Rev 62(76–89):2017
Zeleňáková M, Zvijáková L (2017b) Using risk analysis for flood protection assessment. Springer, Cham, 127p
Zhou K, Sheate WR (2011) EIA application in China’s expressway infrastructure: clarifying the decision-making hierarchy. J Environ Manage 92(6):1471–1483
Zvijáková L, Zeleňáková M, Purcz P (2014) Evaluation of environmental impact assessment effectiveness in Slovakia. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 32(2):150–161
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by projects VEGA 1/0217/19 and APVV-18-0360.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zeleňáková, M., Zvijáková, L. (2020). Selection of the Best Variant of Flood Protection. In: Blikharskyy, Z., Koszelnik, P., Mesaros, P. (eds) Proceedings of CEE 2019. CEE 2019. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 47. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27011-7_72
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27011-7_72
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27010-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27011-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)