Skip to main content

“Ruins True Refuge”: Beckett and Pinter

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ruins in the Literary and Cultural Imagination
  • 361 Accesses

Abstract

This essay uses a combination of archival material and textual analysis to explore how Harold Pinter managed to take Samuel Beckett’s fragmentary texts, his self-reflexive dead ends and entropic permutations, into new lineages of literary creativity. Taking a lead from the notion of the ruin, the essay uses the history of so-called language scepticism to argue for commonalities between the two writers in order to show how various ways in which things might be “ruined,” that is physically, psychologically and primarily linguistically, can provide a useful lens through which we might track some of the ways in which Pinter took Beckett’s work into new realms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Eoin O’Brien discusses possible real-life counterparts of such fictionalized, memorialized ruins in The Beckett Country, such as one on the slopes of Prince William’s Seat in the Wicklow mountains outside Dublin (1986, 63).

  2. 2.

    With personal correspondence now available it is possible to note that Beckett did indeed discuss Blanchot during the six-year period between Blanchot publishing Faux pas and Beckett writing the Three Dialogues. Duthuit sent articles by Blanchot to Beckett, at least one of which—likely an essay on Sade—was sent in order that Beckett would translate it. In 1951 Beckett mentions Faux pas explicitly when advising Duthuit on how to present the text for publication in Duthuit’s journal Transition.

  3. 3.

    For an excellent introduction to reading Beckett in relation to broader traditions of language/linguistic scepticism, see Dirk van Hulle’s essay in Beckett/Philosophy (2015).

  4. 4.

    Harold Pinter, letter to Mick Goldstein , August 1955, reprinted in Pinter (2009, 17–18).

  5. 5.

    Martin Esslin Collection, Keble College, Oxford, AD 65/HP/2/83.

  6. 6.

    Harold Pinter, letter to Mick Goldstein , BL Add MS 89083/1/1/2, letter 12.

  7. 7.

    Harold Pinter, letter to Mick Goldstein , BL Add MS 89083/1/1/2, letter 8.

  8. 8.

    Harold Pinter, letter to Mick Goldstein , BL Add MS 89083/1/1/3, letter 8.

  9. 9.

    Review of Silence and Landscape at The Aldwych Theatre, London in The Observer July 6, 1969.

  10. 10.

    Martin Esslin Collection, Keble College, Oxford, AD 65/HP/2.

References

  • Ackerley, C.J., and S.E. Gontarski. 2006. The Faber Companion to Samuel Beckett. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Samuel. 1984a. Letter to Axel Kaun. Reprinted in Disjecta. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Samuel. 1984b. Three Dialogues with Georges Duthuit in Disjecta. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Samuel. 1996a. The Capital of the Ruins: The Complete Short Prose, 1929–1989. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Samuel. 1996b. The End: The Complete Short Prose, 1929–1989. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Samuel. 1996c. Lessness: The Complete Short Prose, 1929–1989. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Samuel. 2006a. Rough for Theatre I: The Complete Dramatic Works. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Samuel. 2006b. That Time: The Complete Dramatic Works. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Samuel. 2006c. The Old Tune: The Complete Dramatic Works. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Samuel. 2006d. Waiting for Godot: The Complete Dramatic Works. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Samuel. 2009a. How It Is. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Samuel. 2009b. Molloy. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Samuel. 2009c. Watt. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Samuel. 2010. Malone Dies. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchot, Maurice. 1979. Review of The Unnamable in Nouvelle Revue Française, October 1953. In Samuel Beckett: The Critical Heritage, ed. L. Graver and R. Federman, 128–132. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchot, Maurice. 2001. Faux Pas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, Gerald. 2015. The Impossible Experience of Words: Blanchot, Beckett, and the Materiality of Language. Modern Language Quarterly 76 (1): 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, Ruby. 1965. The Absurdly Absurd: Avatars of Godot. Comparative Literature Studies 2 (3): 233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, Steven. 2010. Looping the Loop: Tape-Time in Burroughs and Beckett. www.stevenconnor.com/looping. Accessed 27 Apr 2018.

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Anthony Uhlmann. 1995. The Exhausted. SubStance 24 (3/78): 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gontarski, S.E. 1985. The Intent of Undoing in Samuel Beckett’s Dramatic Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gussow, Mel. 1996. Conversations with Pinter. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harold Pinter Collection at the British Library, BL Add MS 89083/1/1/2, and BL Add MS 89083/1/1/3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin Esslin Collection, Keble College, Oxford, AD 65/HP.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, Eoin. 1986. The Beckett Country: Samuel Beckett’s Ireland. Dublin: Black Cat Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinter, Harold. 1996a. The Dumb Waiter in Plays 1. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinter, Harold. 1996b. Night School in Plays 2. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinter, Harold. 1996c. The Hothouse in Plays 1. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinter, Harold. 2009. Letter to Mick Goldstein. Various Voices: Sixty Years of Prose, Poetry Politics, 1948–2008, 17–19. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Batty, Mark. 2011. Joyce’s Bridge to Late Twentieth-Century British Theater: Harold Pinter’s Dialogues with Exiles. In A Companion to James Joyce, ed. Richard Brown. London: Blackwell, Epub edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, David. 2016. “That First Last Look in the Shadows”: Beckett’s Legacies for Harold Pinter. In Staging Beckett in Great Britain, ed. David Tucker and Trish McTighe, 193–208. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hulle, Dirk. 2015. “Eff It”: Beckett and Linguistic Skepticism. In Beckett/Philosophy, ed. Matthew Feldmann and Karim Mamdani, 279–297. Stuttgart: Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, Shane. 2008. Literature, Philosophy, Nihilism: The Uncanniest of Guests. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tucker, D. (2019). “Ruins True Refuge”: Beckett and Pinter. In: Mitsi, E., Despotopoulou, A., Dimakopoulou, S., Aretoulakis, E. (eds) Ruins in the Literary and Cultural Imagination. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26905-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics