Skip to main content

Standardized Patients

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Anesthesiology

Part of the book series: Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation ((CHS))

  • 857 Accesses

Abstract

While standardized patients (SPs) have enjoyed a long-standing history in education and assessment of many healthcare providers, in anesthesiology, their use remains somewhat limited. It may be prudent to consider increasing the focused use of SPs (and standardized providers) for educating and assessing anesthesiology providers on difficult conversations such as apology and disclosure, informed consent, and conflict in the perioperative setting, given their increasing use for assessment by the anesthesiology boards such as the Royal College of Anaesthetists, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, the Israeli Board of Anesthesiology, and the American Board of Anesthesiology. This chapter aims to review the history of standardized patients in healthcare education, to present evidence of their usefulness in education and assessment, and to provide examples of standardized patient use in anesthesiology education and assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barrows HS, Abrahamson S. The programmed patient: a technique for appraising student performance in clinical neurology. J Med Educ. 1964;39:802–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrows HS. Simulated patients in medical teaching. Can Med Assoc J. 1968;98:674–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Helfer RE. An objective comparison of the pediatric interviewing skills of freshman and senior medical students. Pediatrics. 1970;45(4):623–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stillman PL, Sabers DL, Redfield DL. The use of paraprofessionals to teach interviewing skills. Pediatrics. 1976;57(5):769–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stillman PL, Ruggill JS, Rutala PJ, Sabers DL. Patient instructors as teachers and evaluators. Acad Med. 1980;55(3):186–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stillman PL, Burpeau-Di Gregorio MY, Nicholson GI, Sabers DL, Stillman AE. Six years of experience using patient instructors to teach interviewing skills. J Med Educ. 1983;58(12):941–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Norman GR, Neufeld VR, Walsh A, Woodward CA, McConvey GL. Measuring physicians’ performances by using simulated patients. Acad Med. 1985;60(12):925–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Barrows HS. An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills. AAMC. Acad Med. 1993;68(6):443–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barrows HS. Simulated (standardized) patients and other human simulations. Chapel Hill: Health Sciences Consortium; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Collins JP, Harden RM. AMEE medical education guide no. 13: real patients, simulated patients and simulators in clinical examinations. Med Teach. 1998;20(6):508–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Churchouse C, McCafferty C. Standardized patients versus simulated patients: is there a difference? Clin Simul Nurs. 2012;8(8):e363–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beigzadeh A, Bahmanbijri B, Sharifpoor E, Rahimi M. Standardized patients versus simulated patients in medical education: are they the same or different. J Emerg Pract Trauma. 2016;2(1):25–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Furman GE. The role of standardized patient and trainer training in quality assurance for high-stakes clinical skills examination. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008;24:651–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cleland JA, Abe K, Rethans J. The use of simulated patients in medical education: AMEE guide no 42. Med Teach. 2009;31(6):477–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. May W, Park JH, Lee JP. A ten-year review of the literature on the use of standardized patients in teaching and learning: 1996–2005. Med Teach. 2009;31(6):487–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Harden RM, Stevenson M, Downie WW, Wilson GM. Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. Br Med J. 1975;1(5955):447–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Harden RM, Gleeson FA. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Educ. 1979;13(1):41–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stillman PL, Swanson DB. Ensuring the clinical competence of medical school graduates through standardized patients. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(6):1049–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stillman PL, Regan MB, Swanson DB, Case S, McCahan J, Feinblatt J, Smith SR, Willms J, Nelson DV. An assessment of the clinical skills of fourth-year students at four New England medical schools. Acad Med. 1990;65(5):320–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stillman P, Swanson D, Regan MB, Philbin MM, Nelson V, Ebert T, Ley B, Parrino T, Shorey J, Stillman A, et al. Assessment of clinical skills of residents utilizing standardized patients. A follow-up study and recommendations for application. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114(5):393–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson MB, Stillman PL, Wang Y. Growing use of standardized patients in teaching and evaluation in medical education. Teach Learn Med Int J. 1994;6(1):15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lane C, Rollnick S. The use of simulated patients and role-play in communication skills training: a review of the literature to august 2005. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67(1):13–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Williams B, Song JJ. Are simulated patients effective in facilitating development of clinical competence for healthcare students? A scoping review. Adv Simul. 2016;1(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Anderson MB, Kassebaum DG. Preface. Proceedings of AAMC’s Consensus Conference on the use of standardized patients in the teaching and evaluation of clinical skills. Acad Med. 1993;68(6):438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reznick RK, Blackmore D, Cohen R, Baumber J, Rothman A, Smee S, Chalmers A, Poldre P, Birtwhistte R, Walsh P, et al. An objective structured clinical examination for the licentiate of the Medical Council of Canada: from research to reality. Acad Med. 1993;68(10 Suppl):S4–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Reznick RK, Blackmore D, Dauphinée WD, Rothman AI, Smee S. Large-scale high-stakes testing with an OSCE: report from the Medical Council of Canada. Acad Med. 1996;71(1 Suppl):S19–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tombleson P, Fox RA, Dacre JA. Defining the content for the objective structured clinical examination component of the professional and linguistic assessment board examination: development of a blueprint. Med Educ. 2000;34:566–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dillon GF, Boulet JR, Hawkins RE, Swanson D. Simulations in the United States medical licensing examination™(USMLE™). Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(Suppl 1):i41–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Sutnick AI, Stillman PL, Norcini JJ, Friedman M, Regan MB, Williams RG, Kachur EK, Haggerty MA, Wilson MP. ECFMG assessment of clinical competence of graduates of foreign medical schools. Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates. JAMA. 1993;270(9):1041–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ziv A, Ben-David MF, Sutnick AI, Gary NE. Lessons learned from six years of international administrations of the ECFMG’s SP-based clinical skills assessment. Acad Med. 1998;73(1):84–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Boulet JR, Smee SM, Dillon GF, Gimpel JR. The use of standardized patient assessments for certification and licensure decisions. Simul Healthc. 2009;4(1):35–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Khan KZ, Ramachandran S, Gaunt K, Pushkar P. The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): AMEE guide no. 81. Part I: an historical and theoretical perspective. Med Teach. 2013;35(9):e1437–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Khan KZ, Gaunt K, Ramachandran S, Pushkar P. The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): AMEE guide no. 81. Part II: organisation & administration. Med Teach. 2013;35(9):e1447–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pell G, Fuller R, Homer M, Roberts T. How to measure the quality of the OSCE: a review of metrics–AMEE guide no. 49. Med Teach. 2010;32(10):802–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, Sullivan JE, Issenberg SB. Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE guide no. 82. Med Teach. 2013;35(10):e1511–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nestel D, Burn CL, Pritchard SA, Glastonbury R, Tabak D. The use of simulated patients in medical education: guide supplement 42.1–viewpoint. Med Teach. 2011;33(12):1027–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Laidlaw A, Hart J. Communication skills: an essential component of medical curricula. Part I: assessment of clinical communication: AMEE guide no. 51. Med Teach. 2011;33(1):6–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosen KR. The history of medical simulation. J Crit Care. 2008;23(2):157–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. About ASPE. The Association of Standardized Patient Educators. Available at: http://www.aspeducators.org/about-aspe. Accessed 2 Jan 2017.

  40. Cantillon P, Stewart B, Haeck K, Bills J, Ker J, Rethans JJ. Simulated patient programmes in Europe: collegiality or separate development? Med Teach. 2010;32(3):e106–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bromley LM. The objective structured clinical exam-practical aspects. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2000;13(6):675–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Siker ES. Assessment of clinical competence. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 1999;12(6):677–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. McIndoe A. High stakes simulation in anaesthesia. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2012;12(5):268–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Weller J, et al. Effective management of anaesthetic crises: development and evaluation of a college-accredited simulation-based course for anaesthesia education in Australia and New Zealand. Simul Healthc. 2006;1(4):209–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Weller JM, Henning M, Civil N, Lavery L, Boyd MJ, Jolly B. Approaches to learning for the ANZCA final examination and validation of the revised study process questionnaire in specialist medical training. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013;41(5):631–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yudkowsky R, Alseidi A, Cintron J. Beyond fulfilling the core competencies: an objective structured clinical examination to assess communication and interpersonal skills in a surgical residency. Curr Surg. 2004;61(5):499–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Swing SR. The ACGME outcome project: retrospective and prospective. Med Teach. 2007;29(7):648–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Levine AI, Swartz MH. Standardized patients: the “other” simulation. J Crit Care. 2008;23:179–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Webb AR, Young RA, Baumer JG. Emotional intelligence and the ACGME competencies. J Grad Med Educ. 2010;2(4):508–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Tetzlaff JE. Assessment of competency in anesthesiology. Anesthesiology. 2007;106(4):812–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T, Flynn TC. The next GME accreditation system—rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(11):1051–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Isaak R, Chen F, Hobbs G, Martinelli SM, Stiegler M, Arora H. Standardized mixed-fidelity simulation for ACGME milestones competency assessment and objective structured clinical exam preparation. Med Sci Educ. 2016;26(3):437–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Van der Vleuten CPM, Swanson DB. Assessment of clinical skills with standardized patients: state of the art. Teach Learn Med. 1990;2:58–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Colliver JA, Williams RG. Technical issues: test application. AAMC Acad Med. 1993;68(6):454–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Whelan GP. Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates: clinical skills assessment prototype. Med Teach. 1999;21:156–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Gorter S, Rethans JJ, van der Heijden D, Scherpbier A, Houben H, Van der Vleuten C, Van der Linden S. Reproducibility of clinical performance assessment in practice using incognito standardized patients. Med Educ. 2002;36:827–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Sanci LA, Day NA, Coffey CM, Patton GC, Bowes G. Simulations in evaluation of training: a medical example using standardised patients. Eval Program Plann. 2002;25(1):35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Adamo G. Simulated and standardized patients in OSCEs: achievements and challenges 1992–2003. Med Teach. 2003;25(3):262–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Boulet JR, McKinley DW, Whelan GP, Hambleton RK. Quality assurance methods for performance-based assessments. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2003;8(1):27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Duffy FD, Gordon GH, Whelan G, Cole-Kelly K, Frankel R. Assessing competence in communication and interpersonal skills: the Kalamazoo II report. Acad Med. 2004;79(6):495–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wind LA, Van Dalen J, Muijtjens AM, Rethans JJ. Assessing simulated patients in an educational setting: the MaSP (Maastricht Assessment of Simulated Patients). Med Educ. 2004;38(1):39–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Williams RG. Have standardized patient examinations stood the test of time and experience? Teach Learn Med. 2004;16(2):215–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Newble D. Techniques for measuring clinical competence: objective structured clinical examinations. Med Educ. 2004;38(2):199–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Whelan GP, Boulet JR, McKinley DW, Norcini JJ, van Zanten M, Hambleton RK, Burdick WP, Peitzman SJ. Scoring standardized patient examinations: lessons learned from the development and administration of the ECFMG Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA®). Med Teach. 2005;27(3):200–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Worth-Dickstein H, Pangaro LN, MacMillan MK, Klass DJ, Shatzer JH. Use of “standardized examinees” to screen for standardized-patient scoring bias in a clinical skills examination. Teach Learn Med. 2005;17(1):9–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Baig LA, Beran TN, Vallevand A, Baig ZA, Monroy-Cuadros M. Accuracy of portrayal by standardized patients: results from four OSCE stations conducted for high stakes examinations. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Keifenheim KE, Teufel M, Ip J, Speiser N, Leehr EJ, Zipfel S, Herrmann-Werner A. Teaching history taking to medical students: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Brennan RL. Generalizability theory and classical test theory. Appl Meas Educ. 2010;24(1):1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Freeth D, Hammick M, Koppel I, Reeves S, Barr H. A critical review of evaluations of interprofessional education. London: Higher Education Academy Learning and Teaching Support Network for Health Sciences and Practice; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Reed DA, Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Levine RB, Kern DE, Wright SM. Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. JAMA. 2007;298(9):1002–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Sinz E. Simulation-based education for cardiac, thoracic, and vascular anesthesiology. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005;9(4):291–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Lake CL. Simulation in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia education: tool or toy? Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005;9(4):265–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Kneebone R, Nestel D, Wetzel C, Black S, Jacklin R, Aggarwal R, Yadollahi F, Wolfe J, Vincent C, Darzi A. The human face of simulation: patient-focused simulation training. Acad Med. 2006;81(10):919–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Nestel DF, Black SA, Kneebone RL, Wetzel CM, Thomas P, Wolfe JH, Darzi AW. Simulated anaesthetists in high fidelity simulations for surgical training: feasibility of a training programme for actors. Med Teach. 2008;30(4):407–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Hoelzer BC, Moeschler SM, Seamans DP. Using simulation and standardized patients to teach vital skills to pain medicine fellows. Pain Med. 2015;16(4):680–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Cantrell MJ, Deloney LA. Integration of standardized patients into simulation. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007;25(2):377–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Nestel D, Bearman M. Simulated patient methodology: theory, evidence and practice. New York: Wiley; 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  78. Harless WG, Drennon GG, Marxer JJ, Root JA, Miller GE. CASE: a computer-aided simulation of the clinical encounter. Acad Med. 1971;46(5):443–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Huang G, Reynolds R, Candler C. Virtual patient simulation at US and Canadian medical schools. Acad Med. 2007;82(5):446–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Ellaway R, Poulton T, Fors U, McGee JB, Albright S. Building a virtual patient commons. Med Teach. 2008;30(2):170–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Cook DA, Triola MM. Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps. Med Educ. 2009;43(4):303–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Critchley LA, Wong J, Leung JY. Virtual patients and undergraduate anaesthesia teaching. Med Educ. 2008;42:1120–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Critchley LA, Kumta SM, Ware J, Wong JW. Web-based formative assessment case studies: role in a final year medicine two-week anaesthesia course. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37(4):637.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Leung JY, Critchley LA, Yung AL, Kumta SM. Introduction of virtual patients onto a final year anesthesia course: Hong Kong experience. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011;2:71.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Leung JY, Critchley LA, Yung AL, Kumta SM. Evidence of virtual patients as a facilitative learning tool on an anesthesia course. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2015;20(4):885–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Schwid HA, Souter KJ. Resident perceptions and cost analysis of a virtual patient application for anesthesia-related critical incidents. J Educ Perioper Med. 2014;16(11):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roxane Gardner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gardner, R. (2020). Standardized Patients. In: Mahoney, B., Minehart, R., Pian-Smith, M. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Anesthesiology . Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26849-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26849-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26848-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26849-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics