Skip to main content

Designing Quantitative Research Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Healthcare Simulation Research

Abstract

There are variety of quantitative research designs that are amenable to use in educational scholarship. The design complexity will depend on available resources and the question(s) being investigated. A simulation-based medical education (SBME) quantitative study can range from an observational study to a complex, multiple group effort with or without randomization. Ensuring adequate number of participants are enrolled to have sufficient power to detect important differences is key; most educational research is underpowered. Certain designs (e.g., mastery learning) have grown in use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB. Designing clinical research. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cook TD, Campbell DT, Shadish W. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adler MD, Trainor JL, Siddall VJ, McGaghie WC. Development and evaluation of high-fidelity simulation case scenarios for pediatric resident education. Ambul Pediatr. 2007;7(2):182–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ambp.2006.12.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman CP. The research we should be doing. Acad Med. 1994;69(6):455–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Reflections on experimental research in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010;15(3):455–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bland JM, Altman DG. Some examples of regression towards the mean. BMJ. 1994;309(6957):780.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook DA, Hatala R. Got power? A systematic review of sample size adequacy in health professions education research. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2015;20(1):73–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-014-9509-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Salkind NJ, Rasmussen K. Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2007. 1136.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McGaghie WC. When I say … mastery learning. Med Educ. 2015;49(6):558–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yudkowsky R, Park YS, Lineberry M, Knox A, Ritter EM. Setting mastery learning standards. Acad Med. 2015;90(11):1495–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McGaghie WC. Medical education research as translational science. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(19). 19cm8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mangold, K., Adler, M. (2019). Designing Quantitative Research Studies. In: Nestel, D., Hui, J., Kunkler, K., Scerbo, M., Calhoun, A. (eds) Healthcare Simulation Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26837-4_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics