Abstract
Innovations in technology shape Higher Education. In the UK, technology provides direct interfaces between institution, lecturer and learner, whether the learner is campus-based or studying at a distance. Technology is thus blurring traditional geographic boundaries by widening remote access to the university as well as having a significant role in campus-based pedagogic practice. Educational research into learning at a distance can inform the broader HE community because the differences between on-campus and off-campus learning is often less overt. This chapter details findings from research into what it means to the individual to learn at a distance. This is important and necessary at this juncture: technology provides a range of pedagogic advantages, but, to maximise learning the individual learners’ experience must steer our pedagogic assumptions, actions and aspirations. And yet, relatively little is known about how people learn at a distance. The dynamic nature of the self is often unrecognised in either course design or learning content, where learning itself can be misrepresented as linear and compartmentalised (and often encouraged through modular-designed courses and instrumental evaluations that monitor superficial aspects of the modular experience). By better understanding what it means to be learning at a distance via the interface of technology, we can design and deliver better learning, using technology more effectively, irrespective of where the learner is located. Via an interpretive phenomenological research project into distance learning, we question what it means to learn at a distance and offer practical propositions about maximising learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baxter Magolda, M. B., (2010). The interweaving of epistemological, intrapersonal, and interpersonal development in the evolution of self-authorship. In M. B. Baxter Magolda, E. F. Creame, & P. S. Meszaros, (Eds.), Development and assessment of self-authorship (pp. 25–43). Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing.
Baxter Magolda, M. B., & King, P. M. (2012). Assessing meaning making and self-authorship: Theory, research and application. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
Dewey, J., (1938). In J. Dewey (Ed.), 1997. Experience and education. The Kappa Di Lecturer Series, First Touchstone Edition. New York: Touchstone.
Formenti, L. (2009). Learning and caring in adult life: How to develop a good theory. Paper presented at: ESREA Life History and Biography Network Conference, Wisdom and Knowledge in Researching and Learning Lives: Diversity, Differences and Commonalities. Milan, Italy, March 12–15, 2009.
Gadamer, H. -G. (1960 [2013]). Truth and Method (J. Weinsheimer and D. G. Marshall, Translation). London: Bloomsbury Revelations.
Goldspink, S. (2017). A phenomenological exploration of adult, asynchronous distance learning. Doctoral thesis, Anglia Ruskin University.
Goldspink, S., & Engward, H. (2018). Shedding light on transformational online learning using five practice based tenets: Illuminating the significance of the self. The Asia Pacific Journal of Contemporary Education and Communication Technology, 5(2).
Heidegger, M. (1927)[2010]. Being and time (J. Stambaugh Translation). Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
Kahu, E., Stephens, C., Leach, L., & Zepke, N. (2015). Linking academic emotions and student engagement: Mature-Aged distance students’ transition to University. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(4), 481–497.
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York: Association Press.
Land, R., & Meyer, J. (2010). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Dynamics of assessment. In J. Meyer, R. Land, & C. Baillie, (Eds.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning (pp. 61–80). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Laurillard, D. (2013). In H. Beetham, & R. Shape (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning. Abingdon: Routledge.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maiese, M. (2017). Transformative learning, enactivism, and affectivity. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36, 197–216.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50(4), 370–396.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945)[2013]. Phenomenology of perception (D. A. Landes Translation). London: Routledge.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mezirow, J. (1996). Contemporary paradigms of learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 46(3), 158–172.
Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5–12.
Mezirow, J., & Associates. (2000). Learning as transformation. Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. New York: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Muraro, D. N. (2016). The critical philosophy and the education for John Dewey. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(17), 1197–1204.
Nanney, B. (2004). Student-centred learning. In Proceedings from the 3rd European Conference in E-Learning. Paris, France, November 25, 2004.
Northcote, M., & Gosselin, K. P. (2016). Handbook of research on humanizing the distance learning experience. Hershey, PA: ICI-Global.
Palmer, P. J., & Zajonc, A. (2010). The heart of higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Quality Assurance Agency (QAA). (2014). The frameworks for higher education qualifications of UK Degree-awarding bodies (Online). Available at: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/publications/information-and-guidance/publication?PubID=2843#.WFp1kv5XXIU.
Rogers, C. (1959). Significant learning: In therapy and in education. Educational Leadership, 16, 232–242.
Rogers, C., & Freiberg, H. J. (1994). Freedom to learn (3rd ed.). New York: Merrill.
Sharan, B., Merriam, T., & Freiler J. (2008). Learning through the body. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 2008 119, 37–47.
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage.
Taylor, E., & Cranton, P. (2013). A theory in progress? Issues in transformative learning theory. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 4(1), 33–47.
Taylor, E. W., & Snyder, M. J. (2012). A critical review of research on transformative learning theory 2006–2010. In E. W. Taylor & P. Cranton (Eds.), Handbook of transformative learning, theory, research, and practice (pp. 37–54). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Universities UK. (2016). Higher Education in England: Provision, Skills and Graduates (Online). Available at: https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Documents/2016/higher-education-in-england-provision-skills-and-graduates.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goldspink, S., Engward, H. (2019). Curiosity and Self-connected Learning: Re-centring the ‘I’ in Technology-Assisted Learning. In: Diver, A. (eds) Employability via Higher Education: Sustainability as Scholarship. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26342-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26342-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26341-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26342-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)