Skip to main content

Behavioral Aspects of the New General Data Protection Regulation: A Consumer-Centric Approach to Operations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Behavioral Operational Research

Abstract

The new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has recently become the new personal data standard in the European Union (EU). Business efforts are concentrated on being ‘GDPR-compliant’—i.e. companies operating in the EU are creating safer personal data environments and ensuring that informed consent is sought from clients for actions such as data monetization and customer ‘profiling’. Yet, very little is known about whether, as a result of GDPR, customers are informed and ready to engage with businesses and to what extent customer behavioral change will affect operations. This chapter looks at a menu of major behavioral regularities and biases and offers a framework for understanding how the spectrum of potential customer responses to GDPR can be anticipated by businesses as well as how operations can be modified and transformed to provide an efficient and quick response to changing personal data landscape. We offer a new customer-centric, human-data-interactive approach based on a combination of insights from behavioral science, information systems, and operations research to help businesses understand how customer behavior will shape their business strategy. We also discuss how businesses can adjust their decision-making mechanisms to reflect the new changes in operations resulting from the GDPR adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allais, M. (1953). Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l’Ecole Americaine. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 21(4), 503–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. (1996). ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist, 51(4), 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (2014). Heuristics and biases. In E. Zamir & D. Teichman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics and the Law (pp. 3–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. (2009). Rational Decisions. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, J. S., & Davis, C. J. (2012). Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 138(3), 389–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chater, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Yuille, A. (2006). Probabilistic models of cognition: Conceptual foundations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(7), 287–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Kim, K. A., Nofsinger, J. R., & Rui, O. M. (2007). Trading performance, disposition effect, overconfidence, representativeness bias, and experience of emerging market investors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(4), 425–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhari, J. (2018). Cataloging GDPR complaints since May 25. Privacy Advisor, https://iapp.org/news/a/cataloguing-gdpr-complaints-since-may-25/.

  • Daston, L. (1980). Probabilistic expectation and rationality in classical probability theory. Historia Mathematica, 7, 234–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Laplace, P. S. (1902). A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities (First Edit) (1st ed.). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Boo, H. C. (2011). A literature review of the anchoring effect. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(1), 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (1991). How to make cognitive illusions disappear: Beyond “heuristics and biases”. European Review of Social Psychology, 2(1), 83–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2001). The adaptive toolbox: Toward a Darwinian rationality. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 47, 113–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Why heuristics work. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, M. (2012). Toward a synthesis of cognitive biases: How noisy information processing can bias human decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 211–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korobkin, R. (1997). Status quo bias and contract default rules. Cornell Law Review, 83(3), 608–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I. P., Gaeth, G. J., Schreiber, J., & Lauriola, M. (2002). A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88(1), 411–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89(1), 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marr, B. (2018). How Much Data Do We Create Every Day? The Mind-Blowing Stats Everyone Should Read. Forbes, 21 May. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/05/21/how-much-data-do-we-create-every-day-the-mind-blowing-stats-everyone-should-read/#7af58a8f60ba.

  • Ng, I., Scharf, K., Pogrebna, G., & Maull, R. (2015). Contextual variety, Internet-of-things and the choice of tailoring over platform: Mass customisation strategy in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 159, 76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pogrebna, G. (2015). Servitization through human-data interaction: A behavioural approach. Proceedings of the Spring Servitization Conference, Birmingham, UK, 18–19 May 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogrebna, G., & Guo, W. (2015). Multi-sided markets and pricing for big personal data: Smarter cities and citizens (Working paper). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281063774_Multi-Sided_Markets_and_Pricing_for_Big_Personal_Data_Smarter_Cities_and_Citizens.

  • Rodgers, G. J., & Zheng, D. (2002). A herding model with preferential attachment and fragmentation. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 308(1–4), 375–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. (1938). A note on the pure theory of consumer’s behaviour. Economica, 5(17), 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. (1961). The Foundations of Statistics Reconsidered. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, A. K., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Heuristics made easy: An effort-reduction framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherrill, M. (2007). Self-serving bias. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1997). Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason (Vol. 3). MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soros, G. (2009). The Crash of 2008 and What It Means: The New Paradigm for Financial Markets. New York: PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. (1961). The economics of information. The Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2010). Freefall: America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy (Vol. V). New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surowik, D. (2002). Leonard Savage’s mathematical theory of decision. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 5(18), 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenson, O. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skilful than our fellow drivers? Acta Psychologica, 47(2), 143–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeny, K., Melnyk, D., Miller, W., & Shepperd, J. A. (2010). Information avoidance: Who, what, when, and why. Review of General Psychology, 14(4), 340–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. (2000). From homo economicus to homo sapiens. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The European Union General Data Protection Regulation. (2018). https://www.gdpreu.org/the-regulation/key-concepts/personal-data/.

  • Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Précis of Simple heuristics that make us smart. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 727–741; discussion 742–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Probabilistic reasoning. In A. I. Goldman (Ed.), Readings in Philosophy and Cognitive Science (pp. 43–68). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vranas, P. B. (2000). Gigerenzer’s normative critique of Kahneman and Tversky. Cognition, 76(3), 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vriend, N. (1996). Rational behavior and economic theory. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 29, 263–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Kharlamov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kharlamov, A. (2020). Behavioral Aspects of the New General Data Protection Regulation: A Consumer-Centric Approach to Operations. In: White, L., Kunc, M., Burger, K., Malpass, J. (eds) Behavioral Operational Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25405-6_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics