Skip to main content

A Nonconformity Ratio Based Desirability Function for Capability Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applications in Statistical Computing
  • 926 Accesses

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to provide a process capability index structure, which respects “the higher the better” rule even when the underlying distribution of the quality characteristic not the normal distribution. An estimator of the univariate capability index is proposed and its statistical properties are studied using Taylor series expansion to monitor an exponential and a lognormal distribution. The used approximation shows that the estimator is unbiased and convergent when the underlying distribution is the exponential one. However, like classical indices, the estimator is biased for the lognormal distribution. A comparative study is carried out with some process capability indices from the literature designed to deal with non- normality. The proposed index performs better than existing indices considering “the higher the better” rule as a benchmark. Finally, a bootstrap confidence interval is implemented for capability judgement and a multivariate extension of the index is introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chan, L.K., Cheng, S.W., & Spiring, F.A. (1988). A new measure of process capability: \(C_{pm}\), Journal of Quality Technology, 20(3), 162–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, I.S., & Bai, D.S. (1996). Process capability indices for skewed populations. In Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Computer and Industrial Engineering (pp. 1211–1214).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derringer, G.C. (1994). A balancing act: Optimizing a product’s properties. Quality Progress, 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derringer, G. C., & Suich, D. (1980). Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. Journal of Quality Technology, 12(4), 214–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, E. (1965). The desirability function. Industrial Quality Control, 494–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiang, T. C., & Taguchi, G. (1985). A tutorial on quality control and assurance- The Taguchi methods, ASA annual meeting Nevada: Las Vegas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessenberger, J. (1999). Prozesshäufigkeitsindizes in der Qualitätssicherung, Libri Books on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S., Balakrishnan, N. (1994a). Continuous Univariate Distribution, Wiley Series In Probability And Mathematical Statistics: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Pearn, W. L. (1994b). Flexible process capability indices. Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 10(1), 23–31.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. J., & Lin, D. K. J. (2000). Simultaneous optimization of mechanical properties of steel by maximizing exponential desirability functions. Applied Statistics, 49(3), 311–325.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kotz, S., Johnson, N.L. (1993). Process capability indices, Chapman and Hall: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotz, S., Lovelace, C.R. (1998). Process capability indices in theory and practice, Arnold: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D.S. (1986). Tests of chi-squared type. In R.B. D’Agostino, M.A. Stephens (Eds.), Goodness of fit techniques, Marcel Dekker, Inc: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearn, W. L., Kotz, S., & Johnson, N. L. (1992). Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology, 24(4), 216–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F. K., Hubele, N. F., Lawrence, F. P., Miskulin, J. D., & Shahriari, H. (2000). Comparison of three multivariate process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology, 32(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. A. (1995). A process capability index sensitive to skewness. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 52, 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramzi Talmoudi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Talmoudi, R. (2019). A Nonconformity Ratio Based Desirability Function for Capability Assessment. In: Bauer, N., Ickstadt, K., Lübke, K., Szepannek, G., Trautmann, H., Vichi, M. (eds) Applications in Statistical Computing. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25147-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics