Abstract
Wigner’s particle classification provides for ‘continuous spin’ representations of the Poincaré group, corresponding to a class of (as yet unobserved) massless particles. Rather than building their induced realizations by use of “Wigner rotations” in the textbooks’ way, here we exhibit a scalar-like first-quantized form of those (bosonic) Wigner particles directly, by combining wave equations proposed by Wigner long ago with a recent prequantized treatment employing Poisson structures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Since \((WP) = 0\) and \((PP) \ge 0\) together imply that \((WW) \le 0\).
- 2.
In the “active transformation” view [19, Sect. 3.3].
- 3.
We use open-faced type for the operators on Hilbert space corresponding to geometrical generators.
- 4.
Here called w, since it will be seen to be an avatar of the PL vector.
- 5.
For definiteness, we opted for the upper sign in (12.10d); taking the lower one amounts to changing the sign of \(\kappa \) only.
- 6.
“... alle diese Gleichungssysteme, sofern sie widerspruchsfrei sind, äquivalent sind” [24].
- 7.
The most general transformation fixing a null direction decomposes into a null rotation (belonging to a two-parameter set), a rotation and a boost. The four of them together constitute a Borel subgroup of the Lorentz group; the last two have as invariant directions those of \(\varvec{k}\) and the antipodal \(-\varvec{k}\); the boost does not leave k itself invariant.
- 8.
Or by \(K^a = -\frac{1}{2} \sigma ^a\) and \(L^a = -\frac{i}{2} \sigma ^a\). In the usual terminology, \(K^a = \frac{1}{2} \sigma ^a\) and \(K^a = -\frac{1}{2} \sigma ^a\) correspond to the \(D(0,\frac{1}{2} )\) and \(D(\frac{1}{2} ,0)\) spinor representations respectively, according to [19, Chap. 8].
References
E.P. Wigner, On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group. Ann. Math. 40, 149–204 (1939). https://doi.org/10.2307/1968551
B. Schroer, Wigner’s infinite spin representations and inert matter. Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 362 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4903-9
P. Schuster, N. Toro, On the theory of continuous spin particles: wavefunctions and soft-factor scattering amplitudes. JHEP 1309, 104 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2013)104
P. Schuster, N. Toro, On the theory of continuous-spin particles: helicity correspondence in radiation and forces. JHEP 1309, 105 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2013)105
P. Schuster, N. Toro, Continuous-spin particle field theory with helicity correspondence. Phys. Rev. D 91, 025023 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.025023
X. Bekaert, M. Najafizadeh, M.R. Setare, A gauge field theory of fermionic continuous-spin particles. Phys. Lett. B 760, 320–323 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.07.005
X. Bekaert, E. Skvortsov, Elementary particles with continuous spin. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32, 1730019 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X17300198
M. Najafizadeh, Modified Wigner equations and continuous spin gauge field. Phys. Rev. D 97, 065009 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.065009
M.V. Khabarov, YuM Zinoviev, Infinite (continuous) spin fields in the frame-like formalism. Nucl. Phys. B 928, 182–216 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.01.016
I.L. Buchbinder, V.A. Krykhtin, H. Takata, BRST approach to Lagrangian construction for bosonic continuous spin field. Phys. Lett. B 785, 315–319 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.07.070
K.-H. Rehren, Pauli-Lubański limit and stress-energy tensor for infinite-spin fields. JHEP 1711, 130 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2017)130
J. Mund, K.-H. Rehren, B. Schroer, Helicity decoupling in the massless limit of massive tensor fields. Nucl. Phys. B 924, 699–727 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.09.022
J.M. Gracia-Bondía, F. Lizzi, J.C. Várilly, P. Vitale, The Kirillov picture for the Wigner particle. J. Phys. A. 51, 255203 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aac3b3
A. McKerrell, Canonical representations for massless particles and zero-mass limits of the helicity representation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 285, 287–296 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1965.0104
J.S. Lomont, H.E. Moses, Reduction of reducible representations of the infinitesimal generators of the proper orthochronous inhomogeneous Lorentz group. J. Math. Phys. 8, 837–850 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1705287
J. Schwinger, Particles, Sources and Fields, vol. 1 (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1970)
J.F. Cariñena, J.M. Gracia-Bondía, J.C. Várilly, Relativistic quantum kinematics in the Moyal representation. J. Phys. A 23, 901–933 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/23/6/015
A.P. Balachandran, G. Marmo, A. Simoni, A. Stern, F. Zaccaria, On a classical description of massless particles, in Proceedings of the 1992 ISAQTP–Shanxi, ed. by J.Q. Liang, M.L. Wang, S.N. Qiao, D.C. Su (1993), pp. 396–402
R.U. Sexl, H.K. Urbantke, Relativity, Groups, Particles (Springer, Vienna, 2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6234-7
E.P. Wigner, Relativistic invariance and quantum phenomena. Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 255–268 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.29.255
L.J. Boya, J.F. Cariñena, M. Santander, On the continuity of the boosts for each orbit. Commun. Math. Phys. 37, 331–334 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645946
M. Flato, D. Sternheimer, C. Frønsdal, Difficulties with massless particles? Commun. Math. Phys. 90, 563–573 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01216186
V. Bargmann, E.P. Wigner, Group theoretical discussion of relativistic wave equations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 34, 211–223 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.34.5.211
E.P. Wigner, Relativistische Wellengleichungen. Z. Phys. 124, 665–684 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01668901
E.P. Wigner, Invariant quantum mechanical equations of motion, in Theoretical Physics Lectures, ed. by A. Salam (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1963), pp. 59–82
X. Bekaert, J. Mourad, The continuous spin limit of higher spin field equations. JHEP 0601, 115 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2006/01/115
K.-H. Rehren, Private Communication
P. Schuster, N. Toro, A gauge field theory of continuous spin particles. JHEP 1310, 061 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2013)061
V.O. Rivelles, Remarks on a gauge theory for continuous spin particles. Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 433 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4927-1
R. Penrose, W. Rindler, Spinors and Spacetime, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984)
K. Hirata, Quantization of massless fields with continuous spin. Prog. Theor. Phys. 58, 652–666 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.58.652
J. Yngvason, Zero-mass infinite spin representations of the Poincaré group and quantum field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 18, 195–203 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01649432
J.S. Lomont, H.E. Moses, Simple realizations of the infinitesimal generators of the proper orthochronous inhomogeneous Lorentz group for mass zero. J. Math. Phys. 3, 405–408 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1724240
U.H. Niederer, L. O’Raifeartaigh, Realizations of the unitary representations of the inhomogeneous space-time groups I. Fortschr. Phys. 22, 111–129 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.19740220302
M. Asorey, L.J. Boya, J.F. Cariñena, Covariant representations in a fibre bundle framework. Rep. Math. Phys. 21, 391–404 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4877(85)90040-0
S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields I (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)
J. Mund, String-localized covariant quantum fields, in Rigorous Quantum Field Theory, ed. by A.B. de Monvel, D. Buchholz, D., Iagolnitzer, U. Moschella (Birkhäuser, Boston, 2007), pp. 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-7434-1_14
Acknowledgements
A report by Alejandro Jenkins of a conversation with Mark Wise set this work in motion. We are grateful to Alejandro, as well as to Fedele Lizzi and Patrizia Vitale, for discussions on the gyroscope property, and to Karl-Henning Rehren for most useful remarks about the equations by Wigner. We thank Daniel Solís for checking App. B and a useful observation. The project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 690575. JMG-B received funding from Project FPA2015–65745–P of MINECO/Feder, and acknowledges the support of the COST action QSPACE. JCV received support from the Vicerrectoría de Investigación of the Universidad de Costa Rica.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: Poincaré Group Conventions
Our metric on the Minkowski space \(\mathbb {M}\) is mostly-negative. The inner product of two vectors \(x \equiv x^\mu \), \(p \equiv p^\nu \) of spacetime is denoted with parentheses: \((xp) = x^\mu p_\mu \). When (we hope) it does not cause confusion, we often write \(p^2 = (pp)\), say.
The Lie algebra \(\mathfrak {p}\) of \(\mathcal {P}\) has a basis of ten elements \(\{P^0,P^a,L^a,K^a : a = 1,2,3\}\), corresponding respectively to time translations, space translations, rotations and boosts. The commutation relations for the Lorentz subgroup are as follows:
The commutation relations are realizedFootnote 8 by \(K^a = \frac{1}{2} \sigma ^a\) and \(L^a = -\frac{i}{2} \sigma ^a\).
In the real four-dimensional representation:
with the same commutation relations. Remark that
and \((L^1 + K^2)^3 = (L^2 - K^1)^3 = 0\).
It is advisable to pull these generators together in matrix form:
The general expression is \((J_{\rho \sigma })^\alpha _{\;\beta } = \delta ^\alpha _\rho \,g_{\sigma \beta } - \delta ^\alpha _\sigma \,g_{\rho \beta }\), and the commutation relations are summarized as:
The dual tensor:
plays a role in the theory of the WP. Notice that \(\varvec{K} \cdot \varvec{L} = \frac{1}{2} J_{\rho \mu } J^{*\rho \mu }\) is a relativistic invariant; as is \(\varvec{K}^2 - \varvec{L}^2 = \frac{1}{2} J_{\rho \mu } J^{\rho \mu } = -\frac{1}{2} J^*_{\rho \mu } J^{*\rho \mu }\). These are just the Casimirs of the Lorentz group. A generic infinitesimal Lorentz transformation is of the form
where \(\omega ^{\rho \sigma }\) must be skewsymmetric.
The \(P^\mu \) mutually commute. The remaining nonvanishing commutation relations for \(\mathcal {P}\) are given by:
that is, \([J^{\kappa \rho }, P^\mu ] = g^{\mu \rho } P^\kappa - g^{\mu \kappa } P^\rho \).
Let \(U(\varLambda )\) be the unitary operator acting on one-particle states, corresponding to a Lorentz transformation \(\varLambda \). As discussed for instance in [36, Sect. 2.4], one finds that
where by \(\mathbb {P}\) and \(\mathbb {J} = \{\mathbb {K},\mathbb {L}\}\) we denote hermitian generators on Hilbert space, with commutation relations:
that is, (12.16) leads to
Appendix 2: The Lorentz Decompositions of Null Rotations
The unique decomposition of an arbitrary (proper orthochronous) Lorentz matrix S into the product of a rotation and a boost is well known [19, Chap. 1]. It becomes
where \(\alpha ^2 = 1 + \varvec{a}^2\). Since S and \(S^t\) are Lorentz, which implies \(N\varvec{a} = \alpha \varvec{c}\), \(N^t\varvec{c} = \alpha \varvec{a}\) and \(N^t N = 1_3 + \varvec{a}\varvec{a}^t\), one checks that \(R := N - \varvec{c}\varvec{a}^t/(1 + \alpha )\) is a rotation and that \(R\varvec{a} = \varvec{c}\), and thus also \(R + R\varvec{a}\varvec{a}^t/(1 + \alpha ) = N\).
We want to decompose null rotations in \(G_p\). Note that there is an infinity of spacelike surfaces, of timelike, null or spacelike vectors, which are orbits of \(G_p\) in \(\mathbb {M}\), each isometric to the group of motions of a plane [37]. Consider those null rotations which leave invariant the standard momentum \(k = (1,0,0,1)\). Denoting when convenient \(b_1^2 + b_2^2\) by \(|b|^2\), a general null rotation fixing k is given by:
Simplifying further, we work out first the case \(S(0,-b)\), with \(b > 0\).
Here \(\alpha ^2 = 1 + b^2 + \frac{1}{4} b^4 = (1 + \frac{1}{2} b^2)^2\) so that \(1 + \alpha = \frac{1}{2} (4 + b^2)\), and \(S(0,-b)\) factorizes as
We see clearly that R is a rotation around the y-axis, of positive angle \(\theta \) turning anticlockwise from the positive z-axis towards the positive x-axis, with \(\theta = 2\arctan (b/2)\). The velocity associated with the boost \(L'\) is:
therefore its rapidity parameter is given by \(\zeta = {\text {arcsinh}} \bigl ( \frac{1}{2} b\sqrt{4 + b^2} \bigr )\); the direction of the boost forms an angle \(\arctan (b/2)\) with the x-axis, tilted towards the negative z-axis. For small angles, it is intuitive that the boost undoes the turn effected by the rotation. The result reproduces the one indicated without proof in [32].
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gracia-Bondía, J.M., Várilly, J.C. (2019). On the Kinematics of the Last Wigner Particle. In: Marmo, G., Martín de Diego, D., Muñoz Lecanda, M. (eds) Classical and Quantum Physics. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 229. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24748-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24748-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24747-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24748-5
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)