Abstract
The strategy definition in organizations and its implementation by projects has been difficult to achieve. Project portfolio management processes provide the linkage between the organization’s strategic objectives and their programs and projects. It is worthless to have the latest technology and resources to develop projects, if there are no organized processes and focus on strategic interests. The organizations need to develop processes, tools, and techniques that support their business, to act at the required level, but keeping in mind that these processes and tools need to evolve over time. Therefore, for a better understanding of the processes and use of artefacts from ‘project portfolio management’, this paper aims to develop an information technology ‘project portfolio management’ framework based on ‘project portfolio management’ processes from PMI and artefacts from OGC (Axelos, until 2013). For a better understanding of the process, inputs and outputs artefacts, the framework is modelled using the BPMN-Business Process Modelling and is done a traceability map, of an example artefact, using UML State Machine Model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Markowitz, H.: Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7(1), 77–91 (1952)
Kopmann, J., Kock, A., Killen, C.P., Gemünden, H.G.: The role of project portfolio management in fostering both deliberate and emergent strategy. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 35(4), 557–570 (2017)
Kester, L., Griffin, A., Hultink, E.J., Lauche, K.: Exploring portfolio decision-making processes. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 28(5), 641–661 (2011)
McNally, R.C., Durmuşoğlu, S.S., Calantone, R.J.: New product portfolio management decisions: antecedents and consequences. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 30(2), 245–261 (2013)
McCarthy, I.P., Tsinopoulos, C., Allen, P., Rose-Anderssen, C.: New product development as a complex adaptive system of decisions. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 23(5), 437–456 (2006)
Archer, N., Ghasemzadeh, F.: An integrated framework for project portfolio selection. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 17(4), 207–216 (1999)
Rautiainen, K., Schantz, J., Vahaniitty, J.: Supporting scaling agile with portfolio management: case Paf. com. In: 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 1–10 (2011)
Bitman, W.R., Sharif, N.: A conceptual framework for ranking R&D projects. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 55(2), 267–278 (2008)
Blau, G.E., Pekny, J.F., Varma, V.A., Bunch, P.R.: Managing a portfolio of interdependent new product candidates in the pharmaceutical industry. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 21(4), 227–245 (2004)
Cooper, R., Edgett, S., Kleinschmidt, E.: Portfolio management in new product development: lessons from the leaders-II. Res. Technol. Manag. 40(6), 43–52 (1997)
Mikkola, J.H.: Portfolio management of R&D projects: implications for innovation management. Technovation 21(7), 423–435 (2001)
Project Management Institute: The Standard for Portfolio Management. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square (2013)
Axelos, MoPTM Management of Portfolios, London (2011)
McDonald, C., Sarbazhosseini, H.: A state transition approach to conceptualising research: the project portfolio management domain. In: 24th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), pp. 1–10 (2013)
Young, M., Conboy, K.: Contemporary project portfolio management: reflections on the development of an Australian competency standard for project portfolio management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 31(8), 1089–1100 (2013)
Williams, B., Young, M., Young, R., Zapata, J.: Project, programme and portfolio maturity: a case study of Australian Federal Government. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 7(2), 215–230 (2014)
Lima, A., Monteiro, P., Fernandes, G., Machado, Ricardo J.: Dependency analysis between PMI portfolio management processes. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9790, pp. 288–300. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42092-9_22
Lima, A., Machado, R.J., Fernandes, G.: Input and output artefacts in portfolio practices from the OGC standard for Management of Portfolios. In: 2017 17th International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (ICCSA), pp. 1–8 (2017)
OMG, Business Process Model And NotationTM (BPMNTM), OMG (2013). http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.2/PDF/. Accessed 25 Aug 2017
Lima, A., Fernandes, G., Machado, R.J.: Mapping between PMI and OGC artefacts for project portfolio management. In: International Conference on Intelligent Systems 2018’IS (2018)
Lübke, D., Schneider, K.: Visualizing use case sets as BPMN processes. In: Requirements Engineering Visualization, 2008. REV 2008, pp. 21–25 (2008)
OMG, OMG unified modeling language, superstructure version, 2015 (2015). http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5/PDF/. Accessed 28 Aug 2017
Harel, D.: Statecharts: a visual formalism for complex systems. Sci. Comput. Program. 8(3), 231–274 (1987)
Gross, H.: Component-Based Software Testing with UML. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within the Project Scope: UID/CEC/00319/2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lima, A., Fernandes, G., Machado, R.J. (2019). Tailoring PMI and OGC Portfolio Frameworks. In: Misra, S., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2019. ICCSA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11622. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24305-0_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24305-0_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24304-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24305-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)