Skip to main content

Millennials, Information Assessment, and Social Media: An Exploratory Study on the Assessment of Critical Thinking Habits

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Exploring Digital Ecosystems

Abstract

Critical thinking is as a systematic habit of being able to question information, confront different information sources seeking diversity of points of view, understanding statements, and being able to make inferences out of information. Critical thinking is an active behavior against information processing which influences in a positive way individual and organizational decision making. While we can observe different levels of critical thinking in different individuals, millennials are reputed to possess low critical thinking skills given their habit of passively receiving information through social media. In this paper, we study the critical thinking skills of millennials, and we explore the level of critical thinking shown in relation to the reported intensity of use of social media and other traditional media for information acquisition. The paper is based on a quantitative analysis of an incidental sample of 424 millennials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Federici, T., & Braccini, A. M. A. M. (2012). How internet is upsetting the communication between organizations and their stakeholders: A tentative research agenda. In: De Marco, M., Te’eni, D., Albano, V., & Za, S. (Eds.), Information systems: A crossroad for organization, management, accounting and engineering (pp. 377–385). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, A Springer Company.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 38–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang, J., Baptista, J., & Newell, S. (2015). Communicational ambidexterity as a new capability to manage social media communication within organizations. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24, 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Braccini, A. M., & Federici, T. (2013). New Internet-based relationships between citizens and governments in the public space: challenges for and integrated system design. In R. Baskerville, M. De Marco, & P. Spagnoletti (Eds.), Designing organizational systems. An interdisciplinary discourse (pp. 157–180). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Zheng, Y., & Yu, A. (2016). Affordances of social media in collective action: The case of free lunch for children in China. Information Systems Journal, 26, 289–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vaast, E., Safadi, H., Lapointe, L., & Negoita, B. (2017). Social media affordances for connective action—An examination of microblogging use during the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. MIS Quarterly, 41, 1179–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Parry, E., & Urwin, P. (2011). Generational differences in work values: A review of theory and evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality—Differences in young adults’ use of the internet. Communication Research, 35, 602–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bennet, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The “Digital Natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 775–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Paul, R. W., Binkler, A. J. A. (1990). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leyden, D. P. (2011). Critical thinking in economics. Charlotte, North Carolina: Kona Publishing and Media Group, Higher Education Division.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prensky, M. (2005). Listen to the natives. Learn Digit Age, 63, 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Braccini, A. M. A. M., & Federici, T. (2013). A measurement model for investigating digital natives and their organisational behaviour. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013). Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Choo, C. W. (2006). The knowing organisation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lorenzo, G., & Dziuban, C. (2006). Ensuring the net generation is net savvy. Educause Learning Initiative Paper, 2, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sarigoz, O. (2012). Assessment of the high school students’ critical thinking skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5315–5319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aa, Y., Karakaya, A., & Yilmaz, K. (2015). Relations between self—Leadership and critical thinking skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Facione, P. A. (2013). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hammond, J. S., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1998). The hidden traps in decision making. Harv Bus Rev September.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hogarth, R. M., & Soyer, E. (2015). Providing information for decision making: Contrasting description and simulation. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 221–228.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Metallo, C., & Agrifoglio, R. (2015). The effects of generational differences on use continuance of Twitter: An investigation of digital natives and digital immigrants. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34, 869–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Braccini, A. M., & Marzo, F. (2016). Digital natives and digital immigrants behaviour in trust choices: An experimental study on social trust attitudes and cognition. In: D’Ascenzo, F., Magni, M., Lazazzara, A., & Za, S. (Eds.), Blurring the boundaries through digital innovation (pp. 103–115). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oblinger, D. G. T. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps toward understanding the net generation. In: Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp. 2.1–2.20). North Carolina State University.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor, A. (2012). A study of the information seeking behaviour of the millennial generation. Information Research, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goldberg, L. R., & Coufal, K. L. (2009). Reflections on service-learning, critical thinking, and cultural competence. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  28. PewResearchCenter. (2010). Millennials. A portrait of generation next.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Horiz, 9, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessio Maria Braccini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Menichelli, M., Braccini, A.M. (2020). Millennials, Information Assessment, and Social Media: An Exploratory Study on the Assessment of Critical Thinking Habits. In: Lazazzara, A., Ricciardi, F., Za, S. (eds) Exploring Digital Ecosystems. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23665-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics