Abstract
In this paper I do three things: I comment on the idea of the “system” of the sciences in relation to Husserl’s work and the role of history within that system; I talk about Seebohm’s approach to history as a science; and I evaluate his idea of the relation between history and the other sciences with respect to his take on the “paradox of subjectivity.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Husserl, Edmund. 1952. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution, Husserliana IV. Ed. Marly Biemel. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
———. 1954. Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften, Husserliana VI. Ed. Walter Biemel. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
———. 1962. Phänomenologische Psychologie, Husserliana IX. Ed. Walter Biemel. Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Seebohm, Thomas M. 2015. History as a science and the system of the sciences: Phenomenological investigations. New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carr, D. (2020). On Thomas Seebohm’s History as a Science and the System of the Sciences. In: Nenon, T. (eds) Thomas Seebohm on the Foundations of the Sciences. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 105. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23661-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23661-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23660-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23661-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)