Skip to main content

Endoscopic Evaluation of Surgical Patients

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The SAGES Manual of Flexible Endoscopy
  • 694 Accesses

Abstract

Flexible endoscopy plays an essential role in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative evaluation of patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. Preoperative endoscopy focuses on accurately defining individual patient anatomy and disease characteristics, so that a customized operative plan can be developed. Intraoperatively, endoscopy allows for the identification of anatomic landmarks and assessment of procedures such as fundoplication and GI anastomoses. In the early postoperative period, endoscopy is important in both the diagnosis and treatment of complications, including anastomotic leak and intraluminal GI bleeding. Endoscopy is also central to the long-term evaluation of symptoms and in the routine surveillance of patients after oncologic resections. This chapter will explore the multitude of ways in which endoscopy serves as an invaluable tool to the surgeon before, during, and after GI operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG, Gerson LB, American College of Gastroenterology. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(1):30–50; quiz 1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hill LD, Kozarek RA, Kraemer SJ, Aye RW, Mercer CD, Low DE, et al. The gastroesophageal flap valve: in vitro and in vivo observations. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44(5):541–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kavitt RT, Hirano I, Vaezi MF. Diagnosis and treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis in adults. Am J Med. 2016;129(9):924–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Graham DY, Schwartz JT, Cain GD, Gyorkey F. Prospective evaluation of biopsy number in the diagnosis of esophageal and gastric carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 1982;82(2):228–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Letarte F, Webb M, Raval M, Karimuddin A, Brown CJ, Phang PT. Tattooing or not? A review of current practice and outcomes for laparoscopic colonic resection following endoscopy at a tertiary care centre. Can J Surg (Journal canadien de chirurgie). 2017;60(6):394–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vogel JD, Eskicioglu C, Weiser MR, Feingold DL, Steele SR. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60(10):999–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Silverberg MS, Satsangi J, Ahmad T, Arnott ID, Bernstein CN, Brant SR, et al. Toward an integrated clinical, molecular and serological classification of inflammatory bowel disease: report of a Working Party of the 2005 Montreal World Congress of Gastroenterology. Can J Gastroenterol (Journal canadien de gastroenterologie). 2005;19(Suppl A):5A–36A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yadlapati R, Hungness ES, Pandolfino JE. Complications of antireflux surgery. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113(8):1137–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Beard JD, Nicholson ML, Sayers RD, Lloyd D, Everson NW. Intraoperative air testing of colorectal anastomoses: a prospective, randomized trial. Br J Surg. 1990;77(10):1095–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kahrilas PJ, Kim HC, Pandolfino JE. Approaches to the diagnosis and grading of hiatal hernia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;22(4):601–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Armstrong D, Galmiche JP, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut. 1999 Aug;45(2):172–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Siewert JR, Feith M, Werner M, Stein HJ. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification in 1,002 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2000;232(3):353–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ezra N. Teitelbaum .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Teitelbaum, E.N. (2020). Endoscopic Evaluation of Surgical Patients. In: Nau, P., Pauli, E., Sandler, B., Trus, T. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Flexible Endoscopy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23590-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23590-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23589-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23590-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics