Skip to main content

Topographic Threshold of Gully Erosion in Iran: A Case Study of Fars, Zanjan, Markazi and Golestan Provinces

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gully Erosion Studies from India and Surrounding Regions

Abstract

The relationship between the slope gradient (S ) and drainage area (A) upslope the gully head or point of gully incision represents the topographic conditions for development and positions of gully erosion in different environments. In this study, 300 gullies from 4 provinces including Fars, Markazi, Zanjan and Golestan were selected, and their physical characteristics such as watershed, soil, ground surface and their dimensions were measured. A digital elevation model (DEM) was produced with ArcGIS 9.3, using topographical maps with 1:25,000 scale. The location of gullies was recorded using GPS in the field and transferred on the DEM; also, the boundary of the gullies was depicted using Av. SWAT. Upslope drainage area and slope of the soil surface of gullies were measured using DEM and field survey. The gullies were classified into homogeneous groups, using Cluster analysis method, and effective factors for categorizing were determined using factor analysis. Values, coefficient of determination and significance of the relationships were determined using regression method in Minitab 16 and SPSS 23 software. The results of this research indicated a strong relationship between ground slope and drainage area in both cases of gully development and incision at 1% significance level. The relationship for gully development had an exponent (b) equal to −0.365 and R 2 equal to 0.564, indicating the dominant impact of overland flow on the gully development. Although using values of ground slopes measured on DEM did not decrease the significance level, values of exponent (b), intercept (a) and R 2 decreased. Value of intercept (a) indicates low resistance of landscape to gully erosion in the studied environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alizadeh A (1998) Principles of Applied Hydrology. University of Imam Reza, Mashhad (In Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Begin Z B, Schumm S A (1979) Instability of alluvial floors: A method for its assessment. Transactions of the ASAE. 22(2):347-350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman J (1992) Current erosion on the South Downs: implications for the past. In: Bell M, Boardman J. (Eds.), Past and Present Soil Erosion. Oxbow, Oxford, 9 –19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo C, Gomez J A (2016) A century of gully erosion research: Urgency, complexity and study approaches, Earth Science Reviews 160; 300-319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Zou X, Wu Y, Zhang CH, Zheng Q, Jiang Zh (2007) Morphology parameters of ephemeral gully in characteristics hill slopes on the Loess Plateau of China. Soil & Tillage Research, 4-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmet P, Poasen J, Govers G, Vandaele K (1999) Importance of slope gradient and contributing area for optimal prediction of incision and trajectory of ephemeral gullies. Catena 37:377-392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich W E, Willson C J, Montgomery D R, Mckean J (1993) Analysis of Erosion Model. Journal of Geological, 101:259-278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierez A G, Conoscenti C, Angileri S E, Rotigliano E, Schnabel S (2015) Using topographical attributes to evaluate gully erosion proneness (susceptibility) in two mediterranean basins: advantages and limitations, Natural Hazards 79; 291-314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierez A G, Schnabel S, Contador F L (2009) Gully erosion, land use and topographical thresholds during the last 60 years in a small rangeland catchment in SW Spain, Land Degradation and Development 20(5);535-550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock G R, Evans K G (2006) Gully position, characteristics and geomorphic thresholds in an undisturbed catchment in northern Australia, Hydrological Processes 20: 2935-2951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessel R, Asch T V (2003) Modelling gully erosion for a small catchment on the Chinese Loess Plateau Catena 54:131-146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakembo V, Xanga W W, Rowntree K (2009) Topographic thresholds in gully development on the hillslopes of communal areas in Ngqushwa Local Municipality, Eastern Cape, South Africa, Geomorphology 110(3-4); 188-194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liniger H, Critchley W (2007) Where the Land is Greener: case studies and analysis of soil and water conservation initiatives worldwide, WOCAT, FAO and CDE, 364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monos-Robles C; Reid N; Fraizer P; Tighe M; Briggs S V; Wilson B (2010) Factors related to gully erosion in woody encroachment in south-eastern Australia, CATENA 83(2-3);148-157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsiers E, Poesen J, Dessie M, Adgo E, Verhoest N E C, Deckers J and Nyssen J (2015) Effects of drainage ditches and stone bunds on topographical thresholds for gully head development in North Ethiopia, Geomorphology 234; 193-203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery D R, Dietrich W E (1988) Where do channels begin. Nature 336:232- 234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery D R, Dietrich W E (1994) A physical based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding, Water Resources Research, 30(4):1153-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan R P C, Mngomezulu D (2003) Threshold conditions for initiation of valley-side gullies in The Middle Veld of Swaziland, Catena 50:401-414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nachtergaele J, Poesen J, Wijdenes D O, Vandekerckhove L (2002) Medium-term evolution of a gully developed in a loess-derived soil, Geomorphology, 46(3):223-239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanson G C, Erskine W D (1988) Episodic changes in channels and floodplains on coastal rivers in New South Wales. In: Warner, R.F. (Ed.), IN: Fluvial Geomorphology of Australia. Academic Press Australia, Marrickville, NSW, 201–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazari Samani A, Ahmadi H, Jafari M, Boggs G, Ghoddousi J, Malekian A (2005) Geomorphic threshold condition for gully erosion in Southwestern Iran (Boushehr- Samal watershed), Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 35:180-189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldeman L R, Hakkeling R U, Sombroek W G (1990) World map of the status of human-induced soil degradation: an explanatory note. International Soil Reference and Incision Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton P C, Schumm S A (1975) Gully Erosion, Northwestern Colorado: A Threshold Phenomenon, Geology 56:88-90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips J D (2006) Evolutionary geomorphology: thresholds and non-linearity in landform response to environmental change, Tobacco road team department of geography, university of Kentucky, Lexington.KY 40506-0027 USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poesen J (1993) Gully typology and gully control measures in the European loess belt. In: Wicherek S (ed.), Farm Land Erosion in Temperate Plains Environment and Hills, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 221– 239.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Poesen J, Nachtergaele J, Verstraeten G, Valentin C (2003) Gully erosion and environmental change: importance and research needs, Catena, 50:91-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poesen J, Torri D, Vanwalleghem T (2011) Gully erosion: procedures to adopt when modeling soil erosion in landscape affected by gullying. Chapt. 19, in Morgan R P C and Nearing M A (Eds) Handbook of Erosion Modelling. ISBN: 978-1-4051-9010-7, Wiley – Blackwell, 360-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser I P, Abernethy B (1996) Predicting the topographic limits to a gully network using a digital terrain model and process thresholds. Water Resources Research, 32: 2289-2298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil and Water Research Institute (2008) Manual for laboratory analysis of soil and water samples, no. 467 (In Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Soufi M, Bayat R (2015) Morphoclimatic Classification of Gullies in Different Climates of I.R.Iran (phase 2). Organization of Research Education and Extension for Agriculture. Ministry of Jihad –E- Agriculture. Iran, SBN no. 48474 (In Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Soufi M, Bayat R (2016) Morphoclimatic Classification of Gullies in Different Climates of I.R.Iran (phase 3). Organization of Research Education and Extension for Agriculture. Ministry of Jihad –E- Agriculture. Iran, SBN no. 50689 (In Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Soufi M, Bayat R, Charkhabi A H (2017) Morphoclimatic Classification of Gullies in Different Climates of I.R.Iran (phase 1). Organization of Research Education and Extension for Agriculture. Ministry of Jihad –E- Agriculture. Iran, SBN no. 51544 (In Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun W; Shao Q; Liu J; Zhai J (2014) Assessing the effects of land use and topography on soil erosion on the Loess Plateau in China, CATENA 121;151-163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torri D, Borselli L (2003) Equation for high rate gully erosion. Catena 50: 449-467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torri D, Poesen J (2014) A review of topographic threshold conditions for gully head development in different environments, Earth Science Reviews, 130:73-85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentin C, Poesen J, Li Y (2005) Gully erosion: Impacts, factors and control, Catena 63:132-153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandaele K, Govers G, Wesemael B (1996) Geomorphic threshold conditions for ephemeral gully incision, Geomorphology 16(2):161-173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandekerckhove L, Poesen J, Oostwoud Wijdenes D, Nachtergaele J, Kosmas C, Roxo M J, De Figueiredo T (2000) Thresholds for gully incision and sedimentation in Mediterranean Europe, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 25:1201–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanmaercke M, Poesen J, Van Mele B, Demuzere M, Bruynseels A, Golosov V, Rodrigues Bezerra JF, Bolysov S, Dvinskih A, Frankl A, Fuseina Y, Teixeira Guerra AJ, Haregeweyn N, Ionita I, Imwangana F M, Moeyersons J, Moshe I, Nazari Samani A, Yermolaev O (2016) How fast do gully headcuts retreat? Earth Science Reviews 154;336-355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanwalleghem T, Poesen J, Nachtergaele J, Verstraeten G (2005) Characteristics, controlling factors and importance of deep gullies under cropland on loess -derived soils. Geomorphology 69:76-91

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project is sponsored by Institute of Soil Conservation and Watershed Management in Iran. We acknowledge their support and also the Research and Education Centers of Fars, Markazi, Golestan and Zanjan Provinces in Iran.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Soufi, M., Bayat, R., Davudirad, A., Zanjanijam, M., Esaei, H. (2020). Topographic Threshold of Gully Erosion in Iran: A Case Study of Fars, Zanjan, Markazi and Golestan Provinces. In: Shit, P., Pourghasemi, H., Bhunia, G. (eds) Gully Erosion Studies from India and Surrounding Regions. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23243-6_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics