Abstract
In Argentina, race has been an elusive concept and a changing category. During the nation-building processes of the nineteenth century, ruling elites implemented policies to achieve an ideal white-European national citizenry. The European migrants who arrived in great numbers between the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century were thought to ‘improve’ the pre-existing population comprised of Afrodescendants, Indigenous Peoples, Spaniards, and their mixtures. Through overlapping processes of racialization and ethnicization framed in a settler colonialism process, Argentineans developed two types of mixing ideologies: ‘whitening’, considered a positive process, and mestizaje (mixture). Unlike other Latin American countries where mestizaje and the Mestizo were celebrated by national elites, these terms carried a negative charge in Argentina, as they named the ‘undesirable’ mixed (non-white) people. The permanence of the whitening ideology explains why mixed race categories are still not included in the National Census. Even though Argentina represents itself as a ‘raceless’ republic, the racialization of the social class structure and the ethnicization of race mean that racial classifications continue to exist under different names. As such, mixed race categories—comprising racial, ethnic, and social meanings—emerged through alternative channels.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Don and Doña were used before the name and during colonial times signalled the honourable people, Spaniards always. During republican times, this use extended to mark people of honourable trajectory.
- 2.
The semi-free status given or acquired by African slaves that served as an extended slavery for decades (Alberto 2019).
- 3.
He ruled from 1829 to 1832 and from 1835 to 1852.
- 4.
Geler and Rodríguez explain: ‘Indigenous peoples were cornered through military campaigns referred to as the “Conquest of the Desert” (beginning in 1879), deployed in order to exterminate the so-called “foreign bad Indians”.’ The state captured and locked up families in concentration camps and distributed their members to undertake forced labor (Mases 2002). The survivors were forced to ‘civilize’, ultimately vanishing as ‘Indians’. However, for the Afro-Argentines, the same mandatory participation in the army that allowed them to be seen as civilized, or at least civilizable, also provided the explanation for their supposed disappearance. They were said to die in large numbers due to the use of Mulatto and Black Battalions as ‘cannon fodder’ during wars, especially the one against Paraguay in 1869, alongside other explanations such as epidemics. Even though neither the indigenous peoples nor the Afro-Argentines truly disappeared, they became part of the ‘popular world’. (Geler and Rodríguez 2016, p. 2)
- 5.
Law 817 of Immigration and Colonization, 1876. Also fundamental to that nation-building process was the development of the educational system (Law 1420 of Common Education, 1884), and of the mandatory military service (Law 4301 of Mandatory Enlistment, 1901).
- 6.
Martino (2016) shows that during the twentieth century, Cape Verdeans immigrants were classified as ‘Trigueño’ in their national identity cards.
- 7.
- 8.
Perón presidencies marked a watershed in Argentina’s history, when the popular classes finally had their demands heard.
- 9.
The question, which was very difficult to understand due to its peculiar form, was: ‘Are you or any other person in this home an Afro Descendant, or have any ancestor of Afro Descendant or African origin (father, mother, grandparents, great grandparents)?’.
References
Adamovsky, E. (2016). Race and Class Through the Visual Culture of Peronism. In P. Alberto & E. Elena (Eds.), Rethinking Race in Modern Argentina (pp. 155–183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alberto, P. (2019). Liberta by Trade: Negotiating the Terms of Unfree Labor in Gradual Abolition. Buenos Aires (1820s–30s). Journal of Social History. https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shy035.
Andrews, G. R. (1980). The Afro-Argentines of Buenos Aires, 1800–1900. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Andrews, G. R. (2016). Epilogue. Whiteness and Its Discontents. In P. Alberto & E. Elena (Eds.), Rethinking Race in Modern Argentina (pp. 318–326). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Briones, C. (2002). Mestizaje y blanqueamiento como coordenadas de aboriginalidad y nación en Argentina. Runa, Archivo para las. Ciencias del Hombre, 23, 61–88.
Briones, C. (2005). Formaciones de alteridad: contextos globales, procesos nacionales y provinciales. In C. Briones (Ed.), Cartografías Argentinas. Políticas indigenistas y formaciones provinciales de alteridad (pp. 11–43). Buenos Aires: Antropofagia.
Farberman, J. (2016). Imaginarios sociales en la colonia tardía. Clasificaciones y jerarquías de color en Los Llanos de La Rioja, siglos XVIII y XIX. In F. Guzmán, L. Geler, & A. Frigerio (Eds.), Cartografías Afrolatinoamericanas. Perspectivas situadas desde la Argentina (pp. 25–48). Buenos Aires: Biblos.
Frigerio, A. (2006). “Negros” y “Blancos” en Buenos Aires: Repensando nuestras categorías raciales. In L. Maronese (Comp.), Buenos Aires negra: Identidad y cultura (pp. 77–98). Buenos Aires: CPPHC.
Geler, L. (2014). Afro-Porteños at the End of the 19th Century: Discussing the Nation. African and Black Diaspora: An International Journal, 7(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/17528631.2014.908543.
Geler, L. (2016). African Descent and Whiteness in Buenos Aires: Colors, Ways of Being, and Impossible Mestizajes in the White Capital City. In P. Alberto & E. Elena (Eds.), Rethinking Race in Modern Argentina (pp. 213–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geler, L., & Rodríguez, M. (2016). Argentina. In J. Stone, R. Dennis, P. Rizova, & A. Smith (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Nationalism. Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedias in Social Sciences (pp. 1–4). Wiley Blackwell.
Gimenez, S. M. (2019). El “oscuro” mundo del delito en Buenos Aires. Negritud y mirada policial en la Galería de Ladrones de la Capital (1880–1887). Runa, 39(2), 47–67.
Guzmán, F. (2013). Performatividad social de las (sub)categorías coloniales. Mulatos, mestizos y criollos en tiempos de cambios, guerra y política, en el interior de la Argentina. In F. Guzmán & L. Geler (Eds.), Cartografías Afrolatinoamericanas. Perspectivas situadas para análisis transfronterizos (pp. 61–87). Buenos Aires: Biblos.
Lao-Montes, A. (2009). Cartografías del campo político afrodescendiente en América Latina. Universitas Humanística, 68, 207–245.
Lazzari, A. (2004). Antropología en el Estado: el Instituto Étnico Nacional (1946–1955). In F. Neiburg & M. Plotkin (Eds.), Intelectuales y expertos. La constitución del conocimiento social en la Argentina (pp. 203–229). Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Losonczy, A. (2008). El criollo y el mestizo. Del sustantivo al adjetivo: categorías de apariencia y de pertenencia en la Colombia de ayer y de hoy. In M. De la Cadena (Ed.), Formaciones de indianidad. Articulaciones raciales, mestizaje y nación en América Latina (pp. 261–277). Popayán: Envión.
Margulis, M., & Belvedere, C. (1999). La racialización de las relaciones de clase. In M. Margulis & M. Urresti (Eds.), La segregación negada. Cultura y discriminación social (pp. 79–122). Buenos Aires: Biblos.
Martino, M. C. (2016). Apuntes y reflexiones sobre los modos de la auto-representación. Corpus. Archivos virtuales de la alteridad americana, 6, 2. https://doi.org/10.4000/corpusarchivos.1748.
Mases, E. H. (2002). Estado y Cuestión Indígena. El destino final de los indios sometidos en el sur del territorio (1878–1910). Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
Otero, H. (2004). Crítica de la razón estadística. Ensayo de formalización teórico-metodológica del paradigma censal de la Argentina moderna. In H. Otero (Ed.), El mosaico argentino. Modelos y representaciones del espacio y de la población, siglos XIX–XX (pp. 299–329). Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
Quijada, M. (2000). Imaginando la homogeneidad: la alquimia de la tierra. In M. Quijada, C. Bernand, & A. Schneider (Eds.), Homogeneidad y nación con un estudio de caso: Argentina, siglos XIX y XX (pp. 179–217). Madrid: CSIC.
Rodríguez, M. E. (2016). “Invisible Indians”, “Degenerated Descendants”: Peculiarities of the Mestizaje Ideology in Southern Patagonia. In P. Alberto & E. Elena (Eds.), Rethinking Race in Modern Argentina (pp. 126–154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Salvatore, R. (2004). Criminología positivista, reforma de prisiones y la cuestión social/obrera en Argentina. In J. Suriano (Comp.), La cuestión social en Argentina. 1870–1943 (pp. 127–158). Buenos Aires: La Colmena.
Stavenhagen, R. (2001). El derecho de sobrevivencia: la lucha de los pueblos indígenas en América Latina contra el racismo y la discriminación. Santiago: CEPAL, BID, IIDH.
Veracini, L. (2010). Settler Colonialism. A Theoretical Overview. London: Palgrave.
Verdesio, G. (2016). Ethnic Reemergence in Uruguay. The Return of the Charrúa in the Light of Settler Colonialism Studies. In J. G. Ramos & T. Daly (Eds.), Decolonial Approaches to Latin American Literatures and Cultures (pp. 163–179). New York: Palgrave.
Wainer, L. E. (2010). La Ciudad de Buenos Aires en los Censos de 1778 y 1810. Población de Buenos Aires, 7(11), 75–85.
Sources
Censo General de Población, Edificación, Comercio e Industrias de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Capital de la República Argentina, levantado en los días 17 de agosto y 15 y 30 de septiembre de 1887. 1889. Buenos Aires: Compañía Sudamericana de Billetes de Banco.
Censo Indígena Nacional. Vol. IV, Resultados definitivos 1966–1968. Cuadro de Población de las provincias de Buenos Aires, Chubut, La Pampa, Santa Cruz y Territorio Nacional de Tierra del Fuego, Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur. 1968. Ministerio del Interior. Buenos Aires: Secretaría de Estado de Gobierno.
Censo Nacional de Poblaciones, Hogares y Viviendas. 2001. Buenos Aires: INDEC.
Censo Nacional de Poblaciones, Hogares y Viviendas. 2010. Buenos Aires: INDEC.
Constitución de la Nación Argentina. 1994.
ILO Convention No. 169. 1989.
Primer Censo de la República Argentina, verificado en los días 15, 16 y 17 de septiembre de 1869, bajo la dirección de Diego G. de la Fuente, superintendente del censo. 1872. Buenos Aires: Imprenta del Porvenir.
Segundo Censo de la República Argentina, mayo 10 de 1895. 1898. Buenos Aires: Talleres Gráficos de la Penitenciaría Nacional.
The Durban Declaration and Programme of Action (World Conference against Racism), South Africa, 2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Geler, L.N., Rodríguez, M.E. (2020). Mixed race in Argentina: Concealing Mixture in the ‘White’ Nation. In: Rocha, Z.L., Aspinall, P.J. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Mixed Racial and Ethnic Classification. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22874-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22874-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22873-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22874-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)