Skip to main content

Mixed race in Argentina: Concealing Mixture in the ‘White’ Nation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave International Handbook of Mixed Racial and Ethnic Classification

Abstract

In Argentina, race has been an elusive concept and a changing category. During the nation-building processes of the nineteenth century, ruling elites implemented policies to achieve an ideal white-European national citizenry. The European migrants who arrived in great numbers between the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century were thought to ‘improve’ the pre-existing population comprised of Afrodescendants, Indigenous Peoples, Spaniards, and their mixtures. Through overlapping processes of racialization and ethnicization framed in a settler colonialism process, Argentineans developed two types of mixing ideologies: ‘whitening’, considered a positive process, and mestizaje (mixture). Unlike other Latin American countries where mestizaje and the Mestizo were celebrated by national elites, these terms carried a negative charge in Argentina, as they named the ‘undesirable’ mixed (non-white) people. The permanence of the whitening ideology explains why mixed race categories are still not included in the National Census. Even though Argentina represents itself as a ‘raceless’ republic, the racialization of the social class structure and the ethnicization of race mean that racial classifications continue to exist under different names. As such, mixed race categories—comprising racial, ethnic, and social meanings—emerged through alternative channels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Don and Doña were used before the name and during colonial times signalled the honourable people, Spaniards always. During republican times, this use extended to mark people of honourable trajectory.

  2. 2.

    The semi-free status given or acquired by African slaves that served as an extended slavery for decades (Alberto 2019).

  3. 3.

    He ruled from 1829 to 1832 and from 1835 to 1852.

  4. 4.

    Geler and Rodríguez explain: ‘Indigenous peoples were cornered through military campaigns referred to as the “Conquest of the Desert” (beginning in 1879), deployed in order to exterminate the so-called “foreign bad Indians”.’ The state captured and locked up families in concentration camps and distributed their members to undertake forced labor (Mases 2002). The survivors were forced to ‘civilize’, ultimately vanishing as ‘Indians’. However, for the Afro-Argentines, the same mandatory participation in the army that allowed them to be seen as civilized, or at least civilizable, also provided the explanation for their supposed disappearance. They were said to die in large numbers due to the use of Mulatto and Black Battalions as ‘cannon fodder’ during wars, especially the one against Paraguay in 1869, alongside other explanations such as epidemics. Even though neither the indigenous peoples nor the Afro-Argentines truly disappeared, they became part of the ‘popular world’. (Geler and Rodríguez 2016, p. 2)

  5. 5.

    Law 817 of Immigration and Colonization, 1876. Also fundamental to that nation-building process was the development of the educational system (Law 1420 of Common Education, 1884), and of the mandatory military service (Law 4301 of Mandatory Enlistment, 1901).

  6. 6.

    Martino (2016) shows that during the twentieth century, Cape Verdeans immigrants were classified as ‘Trigueño’ in their national identity cards.

  7. 7.

    Following Frigerio’s (2006) argument, Geler (2016) called this different kind of blackness ‘popular blackness’ and ‘racial blackness’, both deeply interrelated. The first one is thought to include white people.

  8. 8.

    Perón presidencies marked a watershed in Argentina’s history, when the popular classes finally had their demands heard.

  9. 9.

    The question, which was very difficult to understand due to its peculiar form, was: ‘Are you or any other person in this home an Afro Descendant, or have any ancestor of Afro Descendant or African origin (father, mother, grandparents, great grandparents)?’.

References

  • Adamovsky, E. (2016). Race and Class Through the Visual Culture of Peronism. In P. Alberto & E. Elena (Eds.), Rethinking Race in Modern Argentina (pp. 155–183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alberto, P. (2019). Liberta by Trade: Negotiating the Terms of Unfree Labor in Gradual Abolition. Buenos Aires (1820s–30s). Journal of Social History. https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shy035.

  • Andrews, G. R. (1980). The Afro-Argentines of Buenos Aires, 1800–1900. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, G. R. (2016). Epilogue. Whiteness and Its Discontents. In P. Alberto & E. Elena (Eds.), Rethinking Race in Modern Argentina (pp. 318–326). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Briones, C. (2002). Mestizaje y blanqueamiento como coordenadas de aboriginalidad y nación en Argentina. Runa, Archivo para las. Ciencias del Hombre, 23, 61–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briones, C. (2005). Formaciones de alteridad: contextos globales, procesos nacionales y provinciales. In C. Briones (Ed.), Cartografías Argentinas. Políticas indigenistas y formaciones provinciales de alteridad (pp. 11–43). Buenos Aires: Antropofagia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farberman, J. (2016). Imaginarios sociales en la colonia tardía. Clasificaciones y jerarquías de color en Los Llanos de La Rioja, siglos XVIII y XIX. In F. Guzmán, L. Geler, & A. Frigerio (Eds.), Cartografías Afrolatinoamericanas. Perspectivas situadas desde la Argentina (pp. 25–48). Buenos Aires: Biblos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frigerio, A. (2006). “Negros” y “Blancos” en Buenos Aires: Repensando nuestras categorías raciales. In L. Maronese (Comp.), Buenos Aires negra: Identidad y cultura (pp. 77–98). Buenos Aires: CPPHC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geler, L. (2014). Afro-Porteños at the End of the 19th Century: Discussing the Nation. African and Black Diaspora: An International Journal, 7(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/17528631.2014.908543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geler, L. (2016). African Descent and Whiteness in Buenos Aires: Colors, Ways of Being, and Impossible Mestizajes in the White Capital City. In P. Alberto & E. Elena (Eds.), Rethinking Race in Modern Argentina (pp. 213–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geler, L., & Rodríguez, M. (2016). Argentina. In J. Stone, R. Dennis, P. Rizova, & A. Smith (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Nationalism. Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedias in Social Sciences (pp. 1–4). Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimenez, S. M. (2019). El “oscuro” mundo del delito en Buenos Aires. Negritud y mirada policial en la Galería de Ladrones de la Capital (1880–1887). Runa, 39(2), 47–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán, F. (2013). Performatividad social de las (sub)categorías coloniales. Mulatos, mestizos y criollos en tiempos de cambios, guerra y política, en el interior de la Argentina. In F. Guzmán & L. Geler (Eds.), Cartografías Afrolatinoamericanas. Perspectivas situadas para análisis transfronterizos (pp. 61–87). Buenos Aires: Biblos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lao-Montes, A. (2009). Cartografías del campo político afrodescendiente en América Latina. Universitas Humanística, 68, 207–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzari, A. (2004). Antropología en el Estado: el Instituto Étnico Nacional (1946–1955). In F. Neiburg & M. Plotkin (Eds.), Intelectuales y expertos. La constitución del conocimiento social en la Argentina (pp. 203–229). Buenos Aires: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losonczy, A. (2008). El criollo y el mestizo. Del sustantivo al adjetivo: categorías de apariencia y de pertenencia en la Colombia de ayer y de hoy. In M. De la Cadena (Ed.), Formaciones de indianidad. Articulaciones raciales, mestizaje y nación en América Latina (pp. 261–277). Popayán: Envión.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, M., & Belvedere, C. (1999). La racialización de las relaciones de clase. In M. Margulis & M. Urresti (Eds.), La segregación negada. Cultura y discriminación social (pp. 79–122). Buenos Aires: Biblos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, M. C. (2016). Apuntes y reflexiones sobre los modos de la auto-representación. Corpus. Archivos virtuales de la alteridad americana, 6, 2. https://doi.org/10.4000/corpusarchivos.1748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mases, E. H. (2002). Estado y Cuestión Indígena. El destino final de los indios sometidos en el sur del territorio (1878–1910). Buenos Aires: Prometeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otero, H. (2004). Crítica de la razón estadística. Ensayo de formalización teórico-metodológica del paradigma censal de la Argentina moderna. In H. Otero (Ed.), El mosaico argentino. Modelos y representaciones del espacio y de la población, siglos XIX–XX (pp. 299–329). Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quijada, M. (2000). Imaginando la homogeneidad: la alquimia de la tierra. In M. Quijada, C. Bernand, & A. Schneider (Eds.), Homogeneidad y nación con un estudio de caso: Argentina, siglos XIX y XX (pp. 179–217). Madrid: CSIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, M. E. (2016). “Invisible Indians”, “Degenerated Descendants”: Peculiarities of the Mestizaje Ideology in Southern Patagonia. In P. Alberto & E. Elena (Eds.), Rethinking Race in Modern Argentina (pp. 126–154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, R. (2004). Criminología positivista, reforma de prisiones y la cuestión social/obrera en Argentina. In J. Suriano (Comp.), La cuestión social en Argentina. 1870–1943 (pp. 127–158). Buenos Aires: La Colmena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavenhagen, R. (2001). El derecho de sobrevivencia: la lucha de los pueblos indígenas en América Latina contra el racismo y la discriminación. Santiago: CEPAL, BID, IIDH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veracini, L. (2010). Settler Colonialism. A Theoretical Overview. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Verdesio, G. (2016). Ethnic Reemergence in Uruguay. The Return of the Charrúa in the Light of Settler Colonialism Studies. In J. G. Ramos & T. Daly (Eds.), Decolonial Approaches to Latin American Literatures and Cultures (pp. 163–179). New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, L. E. (2010). La Ciudad de Buenos Aires en los Censos de 1778 y 1810. Población de Buenos Aires, 7(11), 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

Sources

  • Censo General de Población, Edificación, Comercio e Industrias de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Capital de la República Argentina, levantado en los días 17 de agosto y 15 y 30 de septiembre de 1887. 1889. Buenos Aires: Compañía Sudamericana de Billetes de Banco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Censo Indígena Nacional. Vol. IV, Resultados definitivos 1966–1968. Cuadro de Población de las provincias de Buenos Aires, Chubut, La Pampa, Santa Cruz y Territorio Nacional de Tierra del Fuego, Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur. 1968. Ministerio del Interior. Buenos Aires: Secretaría de Estado de Gobierno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Censo Nacional de Poblaciones, Hogares y Viviendas. 2001. Buenos Aires: INDEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Censo Nacional de Poblaciones, Hogares y Viviendas. 2010. Buenos Aires: INDEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constitución de la Nación Argentina. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO Convention No. 169. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primer Censo de la República Argentina, verificado en los días 15, 16 y 17 de septiembre de 1869, bajo la dirección de Diego G. de la Fuente, superintendente del censo. 1872. Buenos Aires: Imprenta del Porvenir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segundo Censo de la República Argentina, mayo 10 de 1895. 1898. Buenos Aires: Talleres Gráficos de la Penitenciaría Nacional.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Durban Declaration and Programme of Action (World Conference against Racism), South Africa, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Geler, L.N., Rodríguez, M.E. (2020). Mixed race in Argentina: Concealing Mixture in the ‘White’ Nation. In: Rocha, Z.L., Aspinall, P.J. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Mixed Racial and Ethnic Classification. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22874-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22874-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22873-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22874-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics