Skip to main content

Moral Neuroeducation from a Phylogenetic, Ontogenetic and Functional Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Moral Neuroeducation for a Democratic and Pluralistic Society
  • 138 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to consider a series of key contributions to moral neuroeducation from a threefold phylogenetic, ontogenetic and functional perspective. I will argue that an individual’s transition from social to moral behaviour occurs through the concurrence of certain faculties with a specific degree of complexity. With regard to both phylogenesis and ontogenesis, certain kinds of prosocial behaviours become moral in certain specific conditions. The study of these conditions reveals which faculties are involved in moral behaviour, how they do so, and how they relate to one another. A third functional perspective thereby becomes necessary to explain how morality functions at both the psychological and cerebral levels. A knowledge of the psychological faculties and cerebral structures of morality, as well as an understanding of how they function, is of particular relevance for the creation of tools and pedagogical models for the teaching of moral values, norms and principles. Such a knowledge can be used to promote a sound practice of moral thinking, as well as the adoption of certain types of moral stance, for example favouring prosociality to the detriment of xenophobia, or rationally justified rules as opposed to those based solely on intuition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Apel, K. O. 1985. El a priori de la comunidad de comunicación y los fundamentos de la ética. En Apel, K. O., La transformación de la filosofía (Vol. II), 341–413. Madrid: Taurus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aranguren, J.L.L. 1994. Ética. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F.J. 1987. The biological roots of morality. Biology and Philosophy 2 (3): 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F.J., and C.J. Cela Conde. 2001. La filogénesis de la moral. In Senderos de la evolución humana, ed. F.J. Ayala and C.J. Cela Conde, 517–538. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayuela, A. 2012. The «evil ideology» description and critique of a policy against human nature (el «mal ideológico»: descripción y crítica de una política contraria a la naturaleza humana). Cuadernos de Bioética XXIII 2012/1a: 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. 2013. El cerebro moral. Lo que la neurociencia nos dice sobre la moralidad. Barcelona: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colmenares, F. 2005. De laberintos sociales y de cómo salir de ellos: inteligencia social. In Existo, luego pienso: Los Primates y la Evolución de la Inteligencia Humana, ed. F. Guillén-Salazar, 75–128. Madrid: Ateles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, A. 2007. Ética mínima: Introducción a la filosofía práctica. Madrid: Tecnos.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Ética de la razón cordial: educar en la ciudadanía en el siglo XXI. Oviedo: Nobel, D. L.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Neuroética y neuropolítica: Sugerencias para la educación moral. Madrid: Tecnos.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Aporofobia, el rechazo al pobre. Un desafío para la democracia. Barcelona: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. 2005. En busca de Spinoza: Neurobiología de la emoción y los sentimientos. Barcelona: Crítica.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. El error de Descartes: La emoción, la razón y el cerebro humano. Barcelona: Crítica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1979. El origen del hombre y la selección en relación al sexo. Madrid: EDAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einsengberg, N. 2000. Emotion, regulation and moral development. Annual Review of Psichology 51: 665–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, K. 2010. Neuroética. Cuando la materia se despierta. Madrid: Katz Editores.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Can we be epigenetically proactive? In Open MIND: 13(T), ed. T. Metzinger and J.M. Windt. Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, C.E., and J. Grafman. 2010. The role of the human prefrontal cortex in social cognition and moral judgment. Annual Review of Neuroscience 33: 299–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Marzá, D. 1992. Ética de la justicia. J. Habermas y la ética del discurso. Madrid: Tecnos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, E. 2002. El cerebro ejecutivo: lóbulos frontales y mente civilizada. Barcelona: Crítica.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Esteban, E. 2013. Formación ética de los profesionales. Forjando el interés desde la razón y la emoción. RIO. Revista Internacional de Organizaciones 10: 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J.D. 2003. From neural is to moral ought: What are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology? Nature Reviews of Neuroscience 4: 847–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Moral tribes. Emotion, reason and the gap between us and them. New York: Pinguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 2006. Entre naturalismo y religión. Barcelona: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Madrid: Trotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108 (4): 814–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M.D. 2008. La mente moral. Cómo la naturaleza ha desarrollado nuestro sentido del bien y del mal. Barcelona: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. 1997. La lucha por el reconocimiento: por una gramática moral de los conflictos sociales. Barcelona: Crítica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jácomo, A., and D. Serrão. 2013. Implications of neuroplasticity in neuroethics. In Jerusalém proceedings of the Jerusalem international conference on Neural plasticity and cognitive modifiability, 73–78. Italia: Medimond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C. 2000. Las fuentes de la normatividad. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Doux, J.E. 1999. El cerebro emocional. Barcelona: Ariel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libet, B. 1999. Do we have free will? Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (8–9): 47–57(11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J., R. de Oliveira-Souza, I.E. Bramati, and J. Grafman. 2002a. Functional networks in emotional moral and nonmoral social judgments. NeuroImage 16: 696–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J., R. de Oliveira-Souza, P.J. Eslinger, I.E. Bramati, J. Mourao-Miranda, P.A. Andreiuolo, and L. Pessoa. 2002b. The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions. The Journal of Neuroscience 22: 2730–2736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G.E. 1983. Principia ethica. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgado, I. 2010. Emociones e inteligencia social. Barcelona: Ariel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. 2005. Innateness and moral psychology. In The innate mind: Structure and contents, ed. P. Carruters, S. Laurence, and S. Stich, 353–430. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz de Landázuri, C. 2016. El error neurocientífico de Descartes, entre Spinoza y Tomás de Aquino. El debate entre Damasio y Stump sobre el materialism eliminativo en la neurociencia, neuropolítica y neuroeconomía. Recercare 18: 107–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallarés-Domínguez, D A. Richart. 2018. Neuroética y neuroeducación: repensando la relación entre las neurociencias y las ciencias sociales. Recerca 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallarés-Domínguez, D. 2013. Críticas y orientaciones para el estudio en neuroética. Recercare 13: 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. My brain made me not do it: An emergentist interprestation of Benjamin Libet. Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics 7: 121–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, J. 2011. Where do morals come from? In Empirical informed ethics: Morality between facts and norms, ed. M. Christen et al. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reverter Bañón, S. 2016. Reflexión crítica frente al neurosexismo. Pensamiento 72 (273): 959–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reverter Bañón, S., and M. Medina-Vicent. 2018. Neuroeducación para la democracia y la igualdad. In Juicio moral y democracia. retos de la ética y la filosofía política, ed. A. Richart, M. García- Granero, C. Ortega Esquembre, and L. de Tienda Palop, 314–325. Granada: Comares.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richart, A. 2016. El origen evolutivo de la agencia moral y sus implicaciones para la ética. Pensamiento 72 (273): 849–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., and C. Sinigaglia. 2006. Las neuronas espejo. Los mecanismos de la empatía emocional. Barcelona: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskies, A.L. 2010a. How does neuroscience affect our conception of volition? Annual Review of Neuroscience 33: 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010b. Why Libet’s studies don’t pose a threat to free will. In Conscious will and responsibility, ed. W. En Sinnott-Armstrong and L. Nadel, 11–22. Ney York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salles, A. 2015. Rationality and the moral significance of emotions. In Inherent and instrumental values: Excursions in value inquiry, 89–99. Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017a. Social neuroscience and neuroethics: A fruitful synergy. In Neuroscience and social science: The missing link, ed. A. Ibáñez et al., 531–546. Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017b. Proactive epigenesis and ethics. EMBO Reports 18 (8): 1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teehan, J., and C. diCaro. 2004. On the naturalistic fallacy: A conceptual basis for evolutionary ethics. Evolutionary Psychology 2: 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., and A. Vaish. 2013. Origins of human morality. Annual Review of Psychology 64: 231–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waal, F. 1997. Bien natural: Los orígenes del bien y del mal en humanos y otros animales. Barcelona: Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Primates y filósofos: La evolución de la moral del simio al hombre. Barcelona: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrés Richart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Richart, A. (2019). Moral Neuroeducation from a Phylogenetic, Ontogenetic and Functional Perspective. In: Calvo, P., Gracia-Calandín, J. (eds) Moral Neuroeducation for a Democratic and Pluralistic Society. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22562-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics