Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Definitions of Corporate Social Responsibility

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility

Abstract

This chapter introduces the history of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) starting from early debates about the relative legal obligations of corporate managers towards shareholders and the community, to modern concepts such as corporate sustainability. During this period, many different conceptual models of CSR have been developed, and the subject has grown to encompass ideas such as stakeholdership, business ethics, and social contract theory. The development and relationships between these ideas are outlined, together with references to the relevant literature.

In the nearly 90 years since the Berle-Dodd debate first introduced the notion of what became Corporate Social Responsibility into the public realm, the subject has changed significantly in many ways. Although the basic idea of CSR still goes back to the question of the extent to which businesses can and should concern themselves in areas outside the strictly limited area of shareholder profitability, the field has grown to include a broader range of areas in which CSR is seen to have a role. These are the government sector, the not-for-profit sector, charities, and nongovernmental organizations. In terms of how CSR is understood, many different terms have been used to define it, and it has gone under different names including stakeholder theory, social contract theory, business ethics.

There has been much speculation on the future of CSR – it may cease to be regarded as a separate “add-on” to business operations and become fully integrated into all aspects of a company’s work. Recent trends suggest that there will be increasing partnerships between businesses, NGOs, and other NFP organizations – implemented globally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott WF, Monsen JR (1979) On the measurement of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag J 21:479–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander GJ, Buchholz RA (1978) Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Acad Manag J 21:479–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen M, Skjoett-Larsen T (2009) Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. Supply Chain Manag 14(2):75–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle KE, Carroll AB, Hatfield JD (1985) An empirical investigation of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Acad Manag J 28:446–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Backman J (ed) (1975) Social responsibility and accountability. New York University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle AA (1954) The 20th century capitalist revolution. Harcourt, Brace and Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle AA, Means GC (1932) The modern corporation and private property. Harcourt, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen HR (1953) Social responsibilities of the Rusinessman. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman EH, Haire M (1975) A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility. Calif Manag Rev 18:49–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragdon JH, Marlin JJ (1972) Is pollution profitable? Risk Manage 4:9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB (1979) A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Acad Manag Rev 4:497–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Bus Horiz 34:39–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll A (1999) Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Bus Soc 38(3):268–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane A, Matten D, Spence L (2008) Corporate social responsibility: readings and cases in global context. Routledge, London, pp 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther D, Aras G (2008) Corporate social responsibility. Ventus Publishing, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruver B (2003) Anatomy of greed. Random House, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlsrud A (2008) How corporate social responsibility isdefined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 15:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Darus F, Yusoff H, Abang Naim DM, Mohamed Zain M, Amran A, Fauzi H, Purwanto Y (2013) Islamic corporate social responsibilities (i-CSR) framework for islamic banks: application of maqasid al-syariah and maslahah principles. Issues Soc Environ Account 7(2):102–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis K (1960) Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? Calif Manag Rev 2:70–76. Rev 31(4):375–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis K (1973) The case for and against business assumption of social responsibility. Acad Manag J 16:312–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis K (1975) Five propositions for social responsibility. Bus Horiz 18(3):19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan C (2002) The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation. Account Audit Account J 15(3):282–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd EM (1932) For whom are corporate managers trustees. Harv Law Rev 45:1145–1163, at p1157

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T, Dunfee T (1999) Ties that bind: a social contracts approach to business ethics. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad Manag Rev 20:65–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker PF (1984) The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. Calif Manag Rev 26:53–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Dusuki AW, Abdullah NI (2007) Maqasid al-shari’ah, Maslahah and corporate social responsibility. Am J Islam Soc Sci 24(1):25–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilbert H, Parket IR (1973) The current status of corporate social responsibility. Bus Horiz 16:5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1988) The green consumer guide: from shampoo to champagne, how to buy goods that don’t cost the earth. Orion Publishing Co, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1997) Cannibals with forks: triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Publishing Limited, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2019) Corporate social responsibility, responsible business conduct, and business & human rights: overview of progress. Commission Staff Working Documents, Brussels, 20.3.2019 SWD(2019) 143 final

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick WC (1960) The growing concern over business responsibility. Calif Manag Rev 2:54–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick WC (1986) Toward CSR3: why ethical analysis is indispensable and unavoidable in corporate affairs. Calif Manag Rev 28(2):126–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick WC (1994) From CSR1 to CSR2: the maturing of business-and-society thought. Bus Soc 33(2):150–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1962) Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, pp 32–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Geva A (2008) Three models of corporate social responsibility: interrelationships between theory, research, and practice. Bus Soc Rev 113(1):1–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray R, Owen D, Adams C (1996) Accounting and accountability; changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Prentice Hall Europe, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Heald M (1957) Management’s responsibility to society: the growth of an idea. Bus Hist Rev 31(4):375–384. January, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz DG (1976) Financial correlates of a social measure. Akron Bus Econ Rev 7(1):PP48–PP51

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes SL (1976) Executive perceptions of corporate social responsibility. Bus Horiz 19(3):34–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson HL (1971) Business in contemporary society: framework and issues. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson and Johnson (2000) Social responsibility in action

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones TM (1980) Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. Calif Manag Rev 22(3):59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallin CA (2009) Corporate social responsibility: a case study approach. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Manne HG, Wallich HC (1972) The modern corporation and social responsibility. American Enterprise Institute for Publish Policy Research, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Microsoft (2019) Corporate social responsibility report. Available at: https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE3YnSI

  • Mitroff I (1983) Stakeholders of the organizational mind. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz MR (1972) Choosing socilly responsible stocks. Bus Soc Rev 1:71–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston SH (1975) The changing relation between mortality and level of economic development in population studies. 29(2):231–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson PA (1971) Love that corporation. Mountain Bell Magazine

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi SP (1975) Dimensions of corporate social performance: an analytic framework. Calif Manag Rev 17:58–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Neuss L (2018) Globalization and deindustrialization in advanced countries. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 45:49–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance S (1975) Are socially responsible corporations good investment risks? Manag Rev 64(8):18–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Varma R (2005) The Bhopal disaster of 1984. Bull Sci Technol Soc 25:37–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser W (2006) Revisiting Carroll’s CSR pyramid: an African perspective. In: Huniche M, Rahbek EP (eds) Corporate citizenship in developing countries-new partnership perspectives. Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen, pp 29–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser W (2008) Corporate social responsibility in developing countries. In: Crane A, McWilliams A, Matten D, Moon J, Siegel D (eds) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 473–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkswagen AG (2000) Corporate social performance: commitment and performance. Generic, Milton Keynes

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton CC (1967) Corporate social responsibilities. Wadsworth, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartick SL, Cochran PL (1985) The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Acad Manag Rev 10(4):758–769

    Google Scholar 

  • Wempe B (2007) Integrative social contracts theory (ISCT). In: Kolb RW (ed) Encyclopedia of business ethics and society. The SAGE, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2008) Corporate social responsibility. Available at: https://growthorientedsustainableentrepreneurship.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/csr-wbcsd-csr-primer.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. London Metropolitan University, London, UK

    Lan Jiang

Authors
  1. Lan Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. De Montfort University, Leicester, UK

    David Crowther

  2. Social Responsibility Research Network, Derby, UK

    Shahla Seifi

Section Editor information

  1. De Montfort University, Leicester, UK

    David Crowther

  2. Social Responsibility Research Network (SRRNet), Derby, UK

    Shahla Seifi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Crown

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Jiang, L. (2020). Definitions of Corporate Social Responsibility. In: Crowther, D., Seifi, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22438-7_1-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22438-7_1-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22438-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22438-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation