Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance of Understanding: Pragmatics and Fast and Frugal Heuristics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Extended Theory of Cognitive Creativity

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology ((PEPRPHPS,volume 23))

  • 621 Accesses

Abstract

What determines the meaning of an utterance is a logical matter and as such must be treated independently of the bio-cognitive constraints that operate in our bodies. This thesis, whose great supporter was Frege, implies a clear notion of rationality that seems not to bear comparison with what we know on the limits of our rationality. Various theories (Kahneman and Tversky 1983; Gigerenzer et al., 1999), thematizing the need to consider our rationality beginning from the bio-cognitive constraints that our body imposes on a mass of information, can be of great utility for facing the problem of what type of rationality operates in phenomena of linguistic understanding (Ferreira and Patson 2007; Christiansen and Chater, 2016). From this picture it will clearly emerge that understanding is a performance of human organisms that cannot be described without considering the effective bio-cognitive constraints at work in our actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barsalou, L.W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition, 11(3), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L.W. (1991). Deriving categories to achieve goals. In H. Bower Gordon (a cura di), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 1–64). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carapezza, M., & Cuccio, V. (2018). Abductive inferences in pragmatic processes. In A. Capone, M. Carapezza, & F. Lo Piparo (Eds.), Further advances in pragmatics and philosophy (pp. 221–242). New York/Francoforte: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R. (2012). Relevance theory. In G. Russell & D. Graff Fara (Eds.), Routledge companion to philosophy of language (pp. 163–176). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, M.H. (2016). Creating language. Boston: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, M.H., & Chater, N. (2016). The now-or-never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint of language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 1–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christianson, K. (2016). When language comprehension goes wrong for the right reasons: Good enough, underspecified, or shallow language processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 817–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 181–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. (2007). The ‘good enough’ approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistic Compass, 1(1–2), 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, F., Ferraro, V., & Bailey, K.D. (2002). Good enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 11, 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. (1978). The sausage machine. Cognition, 6, 291–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L., Pacht, J. M., & Rayner, K. (1999). Taking on semantic commitments, II: Collective versus distributive readings. Cognition, 70, 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V. (2008). Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: The neural exploitation hypothesis. Social Neuroscience, 3, 317–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. (2000). Précis of simple heuristic that make us smart. Behevioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 727–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P., & The ABC Group. (1999). Simple heuristic that make us smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H.P. (1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 66, 377–388, in Studied in the way of words, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohwy, J. (2013). The predictive mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.W., Yao, R., Street, W.N., & Simons, D.J. (2011). Change blindness and inattentional blindness. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2, 529–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometria, 47, 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1983). Choice, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2017). The enigma of reason. A new theory of human understanding. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosegaard Hansen, M.B. (2008). On the availability of ‘literal’ meaning: Evidence from courtroom interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 1392–1410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennisi, A., & Falzone, A. (2016). Darwinian biolinguistics. Theory and history of a naturalistic philosophy of language and pragmatics. New York/Francoforte: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F. (2004). Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1957). A behavioral model of rational choice. In Models of man, social and rational. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986/1995). Relevance theory. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics modularity and mind-reading. Mind and Language, 17, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., Cara, F., & Girotto, V. (1995). Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition, 57, 31–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivey, M., & Tanenhaus, M. (1998). Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, C. (1989). The uses of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, A. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behaviour (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In L.R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, Blackwell, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

    Marco Carapezza

Authors
  1. Marco Carapezza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Carapezza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cognitive Science, University of Messina, Messina, Italy

    Antonino Pennisi

  2. Department of Cognitive Science, Psychology, Education and Cultural Studies, University of Messina, Messina, Italy

    Alessandra Falzone

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Carapezza, M. (2020). Performance of Understanding: Pragmatics and Fast and Frugal Heuristics. In: Pennisi, A., Falzone, A. (eds) The Extended Theory of Cognitive Creativity. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22090-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22090-7_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22089-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22090-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation