Skip to main content

Natural Performativity: How to Do Things with Body Constraints

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Extended Theory of Cognitive Creativity

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology ((PEPRPHPS,volume 23))

  • 612 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to define performativity as a natural component of human cognition. The notion of performativity has many applications in various fields from performance studies to pragmatics, but in the recent years it has been introduced within cognitive science studies, where it is currently a subject of great debate. A working definition of performativity as a central component of the human mind that determines the relationship between the individual and the world is proposed. This definition is intentionally general, because it works for every species, not only for humans. Performativity, in fact, is a capacity present in all cognitive systems that have a body because it allows the utilization of those cognitive abilities that evolutionary history has delivered to a species. The concept of performativity with a naturalistic and biologically based approach is analysed taking into account both evolutionary continuity and species-specific functions. In conclusion, an application of the natural performativity of language, a uniquely human function characterized by species-specific morphological structures that constitute constraints for language performativity, is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2001). The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14(1), 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.L. (1975). How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L.W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berwick, R.C., & Chomsky, N. (2016). Why only us. Language and evolution. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boë, L.J., Heim, J.-L., Honda, K., & Maeda, S. (2002). The potential Neanderthal vowel space was as large as that of modern humans. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R.A. (1999). Cambrian intelligence: The early history of the new AI. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D., & Clark, A. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2006). Language and mind (3th ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2015). Embodied prediction. In T. Metzinger & J.M. Windt (Eds.), Open MIND. Frankfurt am Main, MIND Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boer, B., & Fitch, W.T. (2010). Computer models of vocal tract evolution: An overview and critique. Adaptive Behavior, 18, 36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Busser, R., & LaPolla, R.J. (Eds.). (2015). Language structure and environment. Social, cultural, and natural factors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sciullo, A.M., & Boeckx, C. (Eds.). (2011). The biolinguistic enterprise. New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falzone, A. (2006). Biologia, linguaggio, evoluzione. In A. Pennisi & P. Perconti (Eds.), Le scienze cognitive del linguaggio. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falzone, A. (2012). Specie-specificità, linguaggio, rappresentazione: la tecnologia uditivo-vocale nel sapiens. RSL. Italian Journal of Cognitive Sciences, 1, 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falzone, A. (2014). Structural constraints on language. RSL. Italian Journal of Cognitive Sciences, 2, 13–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favaro, L., Gamba, M., Alfieri, C., Pessani, D., & McElligott, A.G. (2015). Vocal individuality cues in the African penguin (Spheniscus demersus): A source-filter theory approach. Scientific Reports, 5, 17255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W.T. (2000). The evolution of speech: A comparative review. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4(7), 258–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W.T. (2012). Evolutionary developmental biology and human language evolution: Constraints on adaptation. Evolutionary Biology, 39, 613–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2015). Reuse and body-formatted representations in simulation theory. Cognitive Systems Research, 34–35, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2015.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 455–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamba, M. (2014). Vocal tract-related cues across human and nonhuman signals. RSL. Italian Journal of Cognitive Science, 1(1), 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghazanfar, A.A., & Takahashi, D.Y. (2014). The evolution of speech: Vision, rhythm, cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(10), 543–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R.W., Jr. (2006). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind & Language, 21(3), 434–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, Y., Wang, J., Fischman, D.A., Biller, H.F., & Sanders, I. (1999). Slow tonic muscle fibers in the thyroarytenoid muscles of human vocal folds; A possible specialization for speech. The Anatomical Record, 256(2), 146–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirano, M., Ohala, J., & Vennard, W. (1969). The function of laryngeal muscles in regulating fundamental frequency and intensity of phonation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 12(3), 616–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, S. (2001). Perception and action: Alternative views. Synthese, 129, 3–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutto, D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, P. (1984). The biology and evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, P. (2006). Toward an evolutionary biology of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menary, R. (2010). Introduction to the special issue on 4E cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9, 459–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minelli, A. (2007). Forme del divenire. Evo-devo: la biologia evoluzionistica dello sviluppo. Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minelli, A. (2015). Biological Systematics in the Evo-Devo era. European Journal of Taxonomy, 125, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minelli, A., & Fusco, G. (2004). Evo-devo perspectives on segmentation: Model organisms, and beyond. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19(8), 423–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Needham, A., & Libertus, K. (2011). Embodiment in early development. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(1), 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noë, A. (2009). Out of our heads. Why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of consciousnes. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennisi, A., & Falzone, A. (2016a). Darwinian biolinguistic. Theory and history of a naturalistic philosophy of language and pragmatics. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennisi, A., & Falzone, A. (2016b). Può esistere una biolinguistica darwiniana? Versus, 123(2), 231–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisanski, K., Mishra, S., & Rendall, D. (2012). The evolved psychology of voice: Evaluating interrelationships in listeners’ assessments of the size, masculinity, and attractiveness of unseen speakers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(5), 509–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, M. (2006). Body language: Representation in action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, M. (2010). The new science of the mind: From extended mind to embodied phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rupert, R. (2004). Challenges to the hypothesis of extended cognition. Journal of Philosophy, 8, 389–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schechner, R. (2013). Performance studies: An introduction. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, L.A. (2004). The mind incarnate. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shield, A., & Meier, R.P. (2018). Learning an embodied visual language: Four imitation strategies available to sign learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L., & Gasser, M. (2005). The development of embodied cognition: Six lessons from babies. Artificial Life, 11, 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stedman, H.H., Kozyak, B.W., Nelson, A., Thesier, D.M., Su, L.T., Low, D.W., Bridges, C.R., Shrager, J.B., Minugh-Purvis, N., & Mitchell, M.A. (2004). Myosin gene mutation correlates with anatomical changes in the human lineage. Nature, 428(6981), 415–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, D.Y., Narayanan, D.Z., & Ghazanfar, A.A. (2013). Coupled oscillator dynamics of vocal turn-taking in monkeys. Current Biology, 23(21), 2162–2168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, D.Y., Fenley, A.R., Teramoto, Y., Narayanan, D.Z., Borjon, J.I., Holmes, P., & Ghazanfar, A.A. (2015). Language development. The developmental dynamics of marmoset monkey vocal production. Science, 349(6249), 734–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, D.Y., Fenley, A.R., & Ghazanfar, A.A. (2016). Early development of turn-taking with parents shapes vocal acoustics in infant marmoset monkeys. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371(1693), 20150370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, D.Y., Liao, D.A., & Ghazanfar, A.A. (2017). Vocal learning via social reinforcement by infant marmoset monkeys. Current Biology, 27(12), 1844–1852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A.M., & Reby, D. (2010). The contribution of source-filter theory to mammal vocal communication research. Journal of Zoology, 280(3), 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, D. (2014). Una via evoluzionista allo studio del rito e della performance. Culture teatrali, 23, 238–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Stock, J., Grèzes, J., & de Gelder, B. (2008). Human and animal sounds influence recognition of body language. Brain Research, 1242, 185–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (2001). The case for sensorimotor coding in working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winer, J.A., & Schreiner, C. (2011). The auditory cortex. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection: A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A. (1993). The fallacy of conventional signalling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B, 338, 227–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A. (2008). The handicap principle and signalling in collaborative systems. In Sociobiology of communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Falzone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Falzone, A. (2020). Natural Performativity: How to Do Things with Body Constraints. In: Pennisi, A., Falzone, A. (eds) The Extended Theory of Cognitive Creativity. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22090-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22090-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22089-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22090-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics