Abstract
The purpose of this work is to define performativity as a natural component of human cognition. The notion of performativity has many applications in various fields from performance studies to pragmatics, but in the recent years it has been introduced within cognitive science studies, where it is currently a subject of great debate. A working definition of performativity as a central component of the human mind that determines the relationship between the individual and the world is proposed. This definition is intentionally general, because it works for every species, not only for humans. Performativity, in fact, is a capacity present in all cognitive systems that have a body because it allows the utilization of those cognitive abilities that evolutionary history has delivered to a species. The concept of performativity with a naturalistic and biologically based approach is analysed taking into account both evolutionary continuity and species-specific functions. In conclusion, an application of the natural performativity of language, a uniquely human function characterized by species-specific morphological structures that constitute constraints for language performativity, is proposed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2001). The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14(1), 43–64.
Austin, J.L. (1975). How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barsalou, L.W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.
Berwick, R.C., & Chomsky, N. (2016). Why only us. Language and evolution. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Boë, L.J., Heim, J.-L., Honda, K., & Maeda, S. (2002). The potential Neanderthal vowel space was as large as that of modern humans. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 465–484.
Brooks, R.A. (1999). Cambrian intelligence: The early history of the new AI. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Chalmers, D., & Clark, A. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.
Chomsky, N. (2006). Language and mind (3th ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, A. (2015). Embodied prediction. In T. Metzinger & J.M. Windt (Eds.), Open MIND. Frankfurt am Main, MIND Group.
de Boer, B., & Fitch, W.T. (2010). Computer models of vocal tract evolution: An overview and critique. Adaptive Behavior, 18, 36–47.
De Busser, R., & LaPolla, R.J. (Eds.). (2015). Language structure and environment. Social, cultural, and natural factors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Di Sciullo, A.M., & Boeckx, C. (Eds.). (2011). The biolinguistic enterprise. New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty. New York: Oxford University Press.
Falzone, A. (2006). Biologia, linguaggio, evoluzione. In A. Pennisi & P. Perconti (Eds.), Le scienze cognitive del linguaggio. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Falzone, A. (2012). Specie-specificità , linguaggio, rappresentazione: la tecnologia uditivo-vocale nel sapiens. RSL. Italian Journal of Cognitive Sciences, 1, 44–47.
Falzone, A. (2014). Structural constraints on language. RSL. Italian Journal of Cognitive Sciences, 2, 13–36.
Favaro, L., Gamba, M., Alfieri, C., Pessani, D., & McElligott, A.G. (2015). Vocal individuality cues in the African penguin (Spheniscus demersus): A source-filter theory approach. Scientific Reports, 5, 17255.
Fitch, W.T. (2000). The evolution of speech: A comparative review. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4(7), 258–267.
Fitch, W.T. (2012). Evolutionary developmental biology and human language evolution: Constraints on adaptation. Evolutionary Biology, 39, 613–637.
Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gallagher, S. (2015). Reuse and body-formatted representations in simulation theory. Cognitive Systems Research, 34–35, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2015.07.003.
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 455–479.
Gamba, M. (2014). Vocal tract-related cues across human and nonhuman signals. RSL. Italian Journal of Cognitive Science, 1(1), 49–68.
Ghazanfar, A.A., & Takahashi, D.Y. (2014). The evolution of speech: Vision, rhythm, cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(10), 543–553.
Gibbs, R.W., Jr. (2006). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind & Language, 21(3), 434–458.
Han, Y., Wang, J., Fischman, D.A., Biller, H.F., & Sanders, I. (1999). Slow tonic muscle fibers in the thyroarytenoid muscles of human vocal folds; A possible specialization for speech. The Anatomical Record, 256(2), 146–157.
Hirano, M., Ohala, J., & Vennard, W. (1969). The function of laryngeal muscles in regulating fundamental frequency and intensity of phonation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 12(3), 616–628.
Hurley, S. (2001). Perception and action: Alternative views. Synthese, 129, 3–40.
Hutto, D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lieberman, P. (1984). The biology and evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lieberman, P. (2006). Toward an evolutionary biology of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Menary, R. (2010). Introduction to the special issue on 4E cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9, 459–463.
Minelli, A. (2007). Forme del divenire. Evo-devo: la biologia evoluzionistica dello sviluppo. Torino: Einaudi.
Minelli, A. (2015). Biological Systematics in the Evo-Devo era. European Journal of Taxonomy, 125, 1–23.
Minelli, A., & Fusco, G. (2004). Evo-devo perspectives on segmentation: Model organisms, and beyond. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19(8), 423–429.
Needham, A., & Libertus, K. (2011). Embodiment in early development. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(1), 117–123.
Noë, A. (2009). Out of our heads. Why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of consciousnes. New York: Hill and Wang.
Pennisi, A., & Falzone, A. (2016a). Darwinian biolinguistic. Theory and history of a naturalistic philosophy of language and pragmatics. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Pennisi, A., & Falzone, A. (2016b). Può esistere una biolinguistica darwiniana? Versus, 123(2), 231–256.
Pisanski, K., Mishra, S., & Rendall, D. (2012). The evolved psychology of voice: Evaluating interrelationships in listeners’ assessments of the size, masculinity, and attractiveness of unseen speakers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(5), 509–519.
Rowlands, M. (2006). Body language: Representation in action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Rowlands, M. (2010). The new science of the mind: From extended mind to embodied phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Rupert, R. (2004). Challenges to the hypothesis of extended cognition. Journal of Philosophy, 8, 389–428.
Schechner, R. (2013). Performance studies: An introduction. London: Taylor & Francis.
Shapiro, L.A. (2004). The mind incarnate. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Shield, A., & Meier, R.P. (2018). Learning an embodied visual language: Four imitation strategies available to sign learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 811.
Smith, L., & Gasser, M. (2005). The development of embodied cognition: Six lessons from babies. Artificial Life, 11, 13–29.
Stedman, H.H., Kozyak, B.W., Nelson, A., Thesier, D.M., Su, L.T., Low, D.W., Bridges, C.R., Shrager, J.B., Minugh-Purvis, N., & Mitchell, M.A. (2004). Myosin gene mutation correlates with anatomical changes in the human lineage. Nature, 428(6981), 415–418.
Takahashi, D.Y., Narayanan, D.Z., & Ghazanfar, A.A. (2013). Coupled oscillator dynamics of vocal turn-taking in monkeys. Current Biology, 23(21), 2162–2168.
Takahashi, D.Y., Fenley, A.R., Teramoto, Y., Narayanan, D.Z., Borjon, J.I., Holmes, P., & Ghazanfar, A.A. (2015). Language development. The developmental dynamics of marmoset monkey vocal production. Science, 349(6249), 734–738.
Takahashi, D.Y., Fenley, A.R., & Ghazanfar, A.A. (2016). Early development of turn-taking with parents shapes vocal acoustics in infant marmoset monkeys. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371(1693), 20150370.
Takahashi, D.Y., Liao, D.A., & Ghazanfar, A.A. (2017). Vocal learning via social reinforcement by infant marmoset monkeys. Current Biology, 27(12), 1844–1852.
Taylor, A.M., & Reby, D. (2010). The contribution of source-filter theory to mammal vocal communication research. Journal of Zoology, 280(3), 221–236.
Tomasello, D. (2014). Una via evoluzionista allo studio del rito e della performance. Culture teatrali, 23, 238–249.
Van den Stock, J., Grèzes, J., & de Gelder, B. (2008). Human and animal sounds influence recognition of body language. Brain Research, 1242, 185–190.
Wilson, M. (2001). The case for sensorimotor coding in working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 44–57.
Winer, J.A., & Schreiner, C. (2011). The auditory cortex. New York: Springer.
Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection: A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214.
Zahavi, A. (1993). The fallacy of conventional signalling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B, 338, 227–230.
Zahavi, A. (2008). The handicap principle and signalling in collaborative systems. In Sociobiology of communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Falzone, A. (2020). Natural Performativity: How to Do Things with Body Constraints. In: Pennisi, A., Falzone, A. (eds) The Extended Theory of Cognitive Creativity. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22090-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22090-7_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22089-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22090-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)