Abstract
The Arctic Ocean is an area where geoscience knowledge and (geo-) politics are closely intertwined. In several regions of the globe, tensions between different States are rising in view of sovereignty claims over parts of the ocean. However, the harsh climate conditions in the Arctic Ocean require tremendous efforts on behalf of its coastal States in order to establish the outer limits of their continental shelves, which force them to collaborate and share information. Over the last 20 years, significant advances in geoscience research have been achieved by mapping and imaging the Arctic seafloor and subsoil, often as a result of close collaboration between the Arctic coastal States. This includes the development of technology to facilitate operations in deep water, in remote areas and under harsh conditions, such as the use of icebreakers, of remotely operated vehicles and of autonomous underwater vehicles. These States are now in a position to prepare well substantiated submissions to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf that delineate the extent of their continental shelves. The international collaboration and cooperation has resulted in a tremendous increase in our collective understanding of the Arctic over the last few decades. In this paper, we will discuss the political context and some of the major geological and tectonic features that make up the Arctic Ocean and its surrounding continental shelves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
On 23 May 2019, Canada submitted to the CLCS, in accordance with Article 76, paragraph 8, of the Convention, information on the limits of its continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured in the Arctic Ocean.
- 2.
In its submission of 23 May 2019, Canada includes the North Pole.
References
Berkman PA, Kullerud L, Pope A, Vylegzhanin AN, Young OR (2017) The Arctic science agreement propels science diplomacy. Science 358(6363):596–598
ECS (2018). https://www.state.gov/e/oes/ocns/opa/ecs/missions/index.htm
IBRU (2015) Map of maritime jurisdiction and boundaries in the Arctic region and accompanying briefing notes. http://www.durham.ac.uk/ibru/resources/arctic
Lane LS, Stephenson RA (2016) Circum-Arctic lithosphere-basin evolution: an overview. Tectonophysics 69:1–7
Oakey GN, Saltus RW (2016) Geophysical analysis of the Alpha–Mendeleev ridge complex: characterization of the High Arctic Large Igneous Province. Tectonophysics 69:65–84
Saltus RW, Miller EL, Gaina C, Brown PJ (2011) Regional magnetic domains of the Circum-Arctic: a framework for geodynamic interpretation. In: Spencer AM, Embry AF, Gautier DL, Stoupakova AV, Sørensen K (eds) Arctic petroleum geology, vol 35. Geological Society, London, Memoirs, pp 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1144/M35.4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roest, W.R., Haworth, R.T. (2020). The Arctic Ocean: Advances in Geopolitics and Geoscience. In: Goel, P., Ravindra, R., Chattopadhyay, S. (eds) Climate Change and the White World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21679-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21679-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21678-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21679-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)