Skip to main content

Biogenic–Abiogenic Interactions in Stromatolites: Study Possibilities and Outlooks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Processes and Phenomena on the Boundary Between Biogenic and Abiogenic Nature

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Earth System Sciences ((LNESS))

Abstract

Stromatolites are produced by a complicated interplay of biogenic and abiogenic processes, whose contributions are hard to estimate without applying specialized techniques enabling the researcher to reproduce these processes. Stromatolites are fairly widespread in nature and are found as building organisms of various shape and size. Most researchers classify them into layered and columnar types or subtypes, which comprise complicatedly but systematically branching columns, oncolites, and microstromatolites. In spite of the morphological diversity of stromatolites, stromatolite reefs were formed over significant areas during a certain span of geological time, with only some types of structures found in them. It was determined that the morphological types of stromatolites obviously show a certain spatiotemporal distribution. This fact cannot be explained by the sedimentation conditions alone, and it indicates that biogenic processes and matter played a key role in the origin of stromatolites. However, no stromatolite-forming organisms had long been found. The later transformations of these rocks further complicated the problem in view of the fact that the great majority of stromatolites are of Precambrian age. A recently suggested and tested technique makes it possible to identify the building organisms of stromatolites and estimate their role in forming the structural–textural features of these rocks. This technique involves SEM studies. This publication discusses the potentialities of the techniques and the reliability of results obtained using it, as well as the outlooks in its application to solving specific problems (identification of cyanobacteria) and more general issues concerning the geology of the Precambrian.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Awramik SM, Schopf JW, Walter MR (1983) Filamentous fossil bacteria from the Archean of Western Australia. Precambrian Res 20:357–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butin RV (1966) Fossil algae of the proterozoic of Karelia. In: Remains of organisms and problems of the Proterozoic formations of Karelia. Petrozavodsk (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerasimenko LM, Zaitseva LV, Orleancky VK, Ushatinskaya GT (2007) Dolomite formation in cyanobacterial mate. Biominerais and biogenic mineral formation. Geoprin, Syktyvkar (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kholodov VN, Paul RK (1996a) On the problem of pellet origin in Cambrian deposits of the Karatau. Dokl Akad Nauk 346(4):514–517 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kholodov VN, Paul PK (1996b) Biochemical regularities in the formation of pelletal phosphorites. Gornyi Vestnik Soc Notes 1:30–40 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Komar VA (1964) Columnar stromatolites of the Riphean north of the Siberian platform. Scientific notes of the Research Institute of Geology of the Arctic (NIIGA). Paleontol Biostratigraph Soc Notes 6:84–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Komar VA (1989) Classification of the microstructures of the upper precambrian stromatolites. Him Geol Soc Notes 13:229–238 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krylov IN, Tikhomirova IS (1988) To the formation of siliceous microfossils. Palaeontological J Soc Notes 3:3–9 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Komar VA, Raaban ME, Semikhatov MA (1962) Konofitony of the Riphean of the USSR and their stratigraphic value. Nauka, Moscow (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krylov IN, Nuzhnov SV, Shapovalova IG (1968) On the stromatolite complexes of the middle Riphean. Dokl AN SSSR 181(2):426–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Krylov IN (1963) Columnar branching stromatolites of the Riphean deposits of the Southern Ural and their significance for the stratigraphy of the Upper Precambrian. Tr Geol Inst Acad Nauk SSSR (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krylov IN (1975) Stromatolites of the Riphean and Phanerozoic in the USSR. Science, Moscow (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krylov IN, Orleansky VK (1988) Laboratory model of formation of carbonate crusts in algal-bacterial films (artificial stromatolites and oncolites). In: Calcareous algae and stromatolites (systematics, biostratigraphy, facies analysis). Nauka, Novosibirsk (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonova LV, Litvinova TV, Glavatskikh SP (2014) Specific microaggregates and problematic microfossils as satellites of biochenogenic rocks. Paleontological J 48(14):1552–1556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litvinova TV (2007) Composition, morphology, and origin of phosphate pellets: evidence from phosphorites of the Lesser Karatau. Lithol Miner Resour Soc Notes 4:426–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvinova TV (2008) On the problem of genesis stromatolites. Palynology: stratigraphy and geoecology. In: Collection of scientific papers of the XII All-Russian palynological conference: VNIIGRI. Saint-Petersburg V. III (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvinova TV (2009) New data on structure and the structure of stromatolitic buildups (Northern Anabar Region). Lithol Miner Resour Soc Notes 4:428–437 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvinova TV (2014a) Stromatolite phosphorites of the Southern Urals and their genesis. Lithosphere Soc Notes 2:50–59 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvinova TV (2014b) Ultramicrostructures of the Stromatolite Reef in the Northern Anabar region and their origin. Lithology and Mineral Resources Soc Notes 5:443–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvinova TV (2016) Biogenic–abiogenic interactions in stromatolitic geosystems and their mineralization. In: Abiogenic Interactions in Natural and Anthropogenic Systems. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvinova TV (2018) Possible role of microorganisms in the formation of structural and textural features of stromatolites. Lethaea rossica. 16:1–11(In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvinova TV, Sergeev VN (2018) Biogenic microstructures in stromatolites of the Baikal-Patom Highland: results of complex Stu. Lithol Miner Resour 53(2):159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naugolnych SV, Litvinova TV (2014) Stromatolites from the Permian deposits of the Perm Cis-Urals: a new form-genus Alebastrophyton Naug. et Litvinova, Gen. nov. In: Media-Grand (ed) Palaeontology in the museum practice. Collection of the scientific articles. Moscow (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Orleansky VK, Gerasimenko LM, Sumina EL (2000) Laboratory cyanobacterial mats and mineral interlayers. In: Materials of the Scientific Conference. Aquatic Ecosystems and Organisms-2. Moscow, MAKS Press (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryabinin VN (1941) Organic residues in carbonate rocks of southern Karelia. Mat Geol Miner KFSSR Leningrad Murmansk region 4:8–21 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Semikhatov MA, Raaben ME (1994) Dynamics of the global diversity of Proterozoic stromatolites. Article 1: Northern Eurasia, China, and India. Strat Geol Correl 2:492–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Semikhatov MA, Raaben ME (1996) Dynamics of the global diversity of Proterozoic stromatolites. Article II: Africa, Australia, North America, and general synthesis. Strat Geol Correl 4:24–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Semikhatov MA, Raaben ME (2000) Proterozoic stromatolite taxonomy and biostratigraphy. In: Riding RE, Awramik SM (eds) Microbial sediments. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Serebryakov SN (1975) Peculiarities of the formation and distribution of Riphean stromatolites in Siberia. Nauka, Moscow (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapovalova IG (1974) Stratigraphy and stromatolites of the Riphean deposits of the Northern part of the Yudomo-May trough. Nauka, Novosibirsk (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ushatinskaya GT (2002) Silicification Bacterial Paleontology. PIN RAN, Moscow (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Walcott CD (1914) Pre-Cambrian Algonquian algal flora. Smiths Misc. Coll. 64(2)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was conducted under government-financed research program at the Geological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, projects № 0135-2016-0021. The electron-microscopic study of stromatolites was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project No. 19-05-00155.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatiana V. Litvinova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Litvinova, T.V. (2020). Biogenic–Abiogenic Interactions in Stromatolites: Study Possibilities and Outlooks. In: Frank-Kamenetskaya, O., Vlasov, D., Panova, E., Lessovaia, S. (eds) Processes and Phenomena on the Boundary Between Biogenic and Abiogenic Nature. Lecture Notes in Earth System Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21614-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics