Abstract
Globalisation and global governance are frequently employed buzzwords when discussing the characteristics of the current global order. This chapter seeks to both define and illustrate the interaction between these two concepts, along with their accompanying ramifications for state sovereignty. In doing so, it identifies the primary actors involved, including states, intergovernmental organisations (IGOs), regional entities, multinational corporations (MNCs), and nongovernmental organisations (NGOs). This chapter also outlines key IR theoretical approaches to global governance, a relevant discussion as global governance is often addressed as an analytical concept or tool, which provides a certain perspective on global politics that differs from mainstream IR theories. The second half of the chapter proceeds on a brief analysis of the ways in which globalization and the diversification of governance play out on the global stage, comparing their differing effects within democratic and authoritarian state systems. In doing so it highlights some adverse effects and critical views on global governance. The chapter concludes that globalisation may exacerbate existing challenges to democratic structures of governance, and that it is therefore necessary to carefully evaluate the organisation and efficacy of global governance schemes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See Uri Friedman’s piece, “Donald Trump Issues a Scathing Rejection of ‘Globalism’”. The Atlantic, 25 September 2018.
- 2.
For the purposes of this discussion, the term ‘civil society’ is used to indicate the public, including individuals, grassroots movements, and NGOs.
- 3.
Such as in the areas of intellectual property, labour standards, environmental standards, and sovereign debt-rating agencies.
Further Readings
Held, D., & McGrew, A. (1993). Globalization and the liberal democratic state. Government and Opposition, 28(2), 261–288. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1993.tb01281.x.
Jentleson, B. (2018, September 9). That post-liberal international order world: Some core characteristics. Lawfare. Retrieved from https://www.lawfareblog.com/post-liberal-international-order-world-some-core-characteristics
Köksal, E. (2006). The impact of multinational corporations on international relations – A study of American multinationals. Middle East Technical University. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=AF50951F32E856AF9B5DF084360711DA?doi=10.1.1.633.5124&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Mcdonald, P. J., & Sweeney, K. (2007). The Achilles’ heel of liberal IR theory? Globalization and conflict in the Pre-World War I era. World Politics, 59(3), 370–403. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40060163
Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A new world order. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Ştefanachi, B. (2011). Globalization and identities – A constructivist approach. In The scale of globalization. Think globally, act locally, change individually in the 21st century (pp. 312–318). Ostrava: University of Ostrava. ISBN 978-80-7368-963-6. Retrieved from http://conference.osu.eu/globalization/publ2011/312-318_Stefanachi.pdf
References
Adolf, R. G. (2011, October 14). Do economic globalization and political freedom go together? Asian Politics & Policy, 3(4), 569–609.
Al-Rodhan, N., & Stoudmann, G. (2006). Definitions of globalization: A comprehensive overview and a proposed definition (1st ed.). Geneva Centre for Security Policy.
Amnesty International. (2017, March). Corporations. In What we do. Retrieved from www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/corporate-accountability/
Balz, D. (2017, April 22). A scholar asks, ‘Can democracy survive the Internet?’ The Washington Post.
Bartelson, J. (2009, March 2). Is there a global society? International Political Sociology, 3(1), 112–115.
Barysch, K. (2013, October 21). Is the internet really good for democracy? World Economic Forum. Retrieved from www.weforum.org/agenda/2013/10/is-the-internet-really-good-for-democracy/
Bolton, M., & Nash, T. (2010, May). The role of middle power-NGO coalitions in global policy: The case of the cluster munitions ban. Global Policy, 1(2), 172–184.
Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor. (2016, March). Fact sheet: Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in the United States. HumanRights.gov. Retrieved from www.humanrights.gov/dyn/2016/01/fact-sheet-non-governmental-organizations-ngos-in-the-united-states/
Cardoso, F. H. (2003, January 2). Civil society and global governance: High level panel on UN-Civil Society. In Global Policy Forum. Retrieved from www.globalpolicy.org/un-reform/31820.html
Crockett, S. (2011, August 27). Has globalization spread democracy around the world? In E-international relations students. Retrieved from www.e-ir.info/2011/08/27/has-globalization-spread-democracy-around-the-world/
Daalder, I. H., & Lindsay, J. M. (2003,January 1). The globalization of politics: American Foreign Policy for a new century. Brookings Institution. Retrieved from www.brookings.edu/articles/the-globalization-of-politics-american-foreign-policy-for-a-new-century/
Dalpino, C. E.. (2001, September 1). Does globalization promote democracy? An early assessment. Brookings Institution. Retrieved from www.brookings.edu/articles/does-globalization-promote-democracy-an-early-assessment/
Detomasi, D. (2014, March 28). The multinational corporation as a political actor: ‘Varieties of capitalism’ revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 685–700.
Dew, D. (2016, September 13). Fear of immigrants and sharks: From stories to statistics. The Gazette. Retrieved from www.thegazette.com/subject/opinion/guest-columnists/fear-of-immigrants-and-sharks-from-stories-to-statistics-20160913
Diamond, L. (2015, January). Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 141–155.
Ervine, P. (2011, Feburary 4). Can China be defined as an Authoritarian State? E-International Relations Students. Retrieved from http://www.e-ir.info/2011/02/04/can-china-be-defined-as-an-authoritarian-state/
Finkelstein, L. (1995). What is global governance? Global Governance, 1(3), 367–372.
Fonte, J. (2011, October 3). Sovereignty or submission: Liberal democracy or global governance? Foreign Policy Research Institute. Retrieved from www.fpri.org/article/2011/10/sovereignty-or-submission-liberal-democracy-or-global-governance/
Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history? The National Interest. Retrieved from https://ps321.community.uaf.edu/files/2012/10/Fukuyama-End-of-history-article.pdf
Global Americans. (2016). Global Americans report: Tracking Latin American foreign policies and human rights. UNASUR/CELAC. Latin America Goes Global. Retrieved from http://latinamericagoesglobal.org/files/LAGG-final-report.pdf, pp 11.
Hägel, P. (2011). Global governance. Oxford Bibliographies. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199743292/obo-9780199743292-0015.xml
Hayoz, N. (2012). Globalization and discursive resistance: Authoritarian power structures in Russia and the challenges of modernity. In Waiting for reform under Putin and Medvedev (pp. 19–37). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Hofferberth, M. (2016, January 19). ‘Confusion is a fundamental state of mind’ – On the peculiar intellectual career of global governance in international relations. Texas: University of Texas, San Antonio, USA. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2015.44.
Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). The future of the liberal world order: Internationalism after America. Foreign Affairs.
Ishkanian, A. (2007). Democracy promotion and civil society. In M. Albrow, M. Glasius, H. K. Anheier, & M. Kaldor (Eds.), Global civil society 2007/8: Communicative power and democracy (Global civil society – Year books, pp. 58–85). London: SAGE.
Kagan, R. (2017, January 24). The twilight of the liberal world order. Brookings Institution. Retrieved from www.brookings.edu/research/the-twilight-of-the-liberal-world-order/
Kalathil, S., & Boas, T. C. (2001, August 6). The internet and state control in authoritarian regimes: China, Cuba, and the Counterrevolution. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/876/785
Kapfer, S. (2006, April 7). Multinational corporations and the erosion of state sovereignty. Brigham Young University. Retrieved from http://pol.illinoisstate.edu/downloads/conferences/2006/Kapfer2006.pdf
Kapfer, S., & Champion, B. (2013, September 20). The growing power of multinational corporations. Brigham Young University Journal of Undergraduate Research. Retrieved from http://jur.byu.edu/?p=6205
Kissinger, H. (2014). World Order. New York: Penguin Press.
Kokoshin, A. A. (2014). Providing Russia with real sovereignty in the contemporary world. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 84(6), 449–455. Translated from Russian by Alekseev, B.
Krasner, S. D. (2009, November 20). Think again: sovereignty. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/11/20/think-again-sovereignty/
Kurlantzick, J. (2010, May 9). Is the internet good for democracy? A debate. Newsweek. Retrieved from www.newsweek.com/internet-good-democracy-debate-70215
Lennox, V. (2008). Conceptualising global governance in international relations. University of Ottowa. Retrieved from www.e-ir.info/2008/10/03/conceptualising-global-governance-in-international-relations/
Leyland, P. J. (2017). Referendums, constitutional reform and the perils of popular sovereignty. The Italian Law Journal, January 2017 Special Issue.
Lewis, D. (2013, July 30). Civil society and the authoritarian state: Cooperation, contestation and discourse. Journal of Civil Society, 9(3), 325–340.
Li, Q., & Reuveny, R. (2003, January). Economic globalization and democracy: An empirical analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 33(1), 29–54.
Linder, S. H., & Rosenau, P. V. (2000). Mapping the terrain of the public-private policy partnership. In Public-private policy partnerships. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Madigan, J. (2013, April 15). The availability heuristic is always on. Psychology Today. Retrieved from www.psychologytoday.com/blog/mind-games/201304/the-availability-heuristic-is-always
Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Mearsheimer, J. (1994). The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5–49.
Milanovic, B. (2003, March 4). The two faces of globalization: Against globalization as we know it. World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Moravcsik, A. (Jan 2010). Affirming Democracy in International Organizations. In Goldstein, Joshua and Pevehouse, Jon (eds.) Global Challenges in 2030. Retrieved from www.princeton.edu/~amoravcs/library/goldstein.pdf
Multinational Corporation (MNC). (2017). BusinessDictionary.com. Retrieved from www.businessdictionary.com/definition/multinational-corporation-MNC.html
Nelson, J. (2007). The operation of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in a world of corporate and other codes of conduct. In Corporate social responsibility initiative. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government/Harvard University.
Nye, J. S. Jr. (1974, October). Multinationals: The game and the rules: Multinational corporations in world politics. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/1974-10-01/multinationals-game-and-rules-multinational-corporations-world-politics
Pieterse, J. N. (2006). Globalization goes in circles: Hybridities east-west. Santa Barbara: University of California.
Pomerantsev, P. (2015, June 23). Beyond Propaganda: How authoritarian regimes are learning to engineer human souls in the age of Facebook. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/06/23/beyond-propaganda-legatum-transitions-forum-russia-china-venezuela-syria/
Puddington, A., & Roylance, T. (2017). Freedom in the World 2017. Populists and Autocrats: The Dual Threat to Global Democracy. Freedom House.
Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460.
Richardson, J. L. (2010). The ethics of neoliberal institutionalism. In The Oxford handbook of international relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Runde, D. F. (2013, October 25). The future of public-private partnerships: Strengthening a powerful instrument for global development. Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS). Retrieved from www.csis.org/analysis/future-public-private-partnerships-strengthening-powerful-instrument-global-development
Shevtsova, L. (2015, April). Forward to the past in Russia. Journal of Democracy, 26(2), 22–36.
Ştefanachi, B. (2011). Globalization and identities – A constructivist approach. In The scale of globalization. Think globally, act locally, change individually in the 21st century (pp. 312–318). Ostrava: University of Ostrava. Retrieved from http://conference.osu.eu/globalization/publ2011/312-318_Stefanachi.pdf
Stølan, R. (2012, June). Political regimes and FDI: An empirical analysis of the attractiveness of hybrid regimes for multinational companies. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Master’s Thesis.
The Economist. (2001, September 27). Globalization and its critics. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/795995
United Nations. (2009, September 11). Guidance note of the secretary general on democracy. Retrieved from www.un.org/democracyfund/Docs/UNSG%20Guidance%20Note%20on%20Democracy.pdf
Walker, C. (Jan 2016). The hijacking of “soft power”. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 49–63.
Walker, C., Plattner, M., & Diamond, L. (2016, March 28). Authoritarianism goes global. The American Interest. Retrieved from www.the-american-interest.com/2016/03/28/authoritarianism-goes-global/
Watson, G. (2004). Liberalism and globalisation. Asia Europe Journal, 2(2), 167–173.
Waltz, K. (1998). Globalisation and Governance. Political Science and Politics, 32(4), 693–700.
Wikan, V. (2015, March 21). What is ‘Neoliberalism’, and how does it relate to globalization? E-International Relations Students. Retrieved from www.e-ir.info/2015/03/21/what-is-neoliberalism-and-how-does-it-relate-to-globalization/
Wu, W.-C. (2015). When do dictators decide to liberalize trade regimes? Inequality and trade openness in authoritarian countries. International Studies Quarterly., 59(4), 790–801.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kasper, A.E.P. (2020). Global Governance 2.0. In: Hosli, M.O., Selleslaghs, J. (eds) The Changing Global Order. United Nations University Series on Regionalism, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21603-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21603-0_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21602-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21603-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)