Skip to main content

Accommodative Intraocular Lenses: Crystalens

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

Part of the book series: Essentials in Ophthalmology ((ESSENTIALS))

  • 751 Accesses

Abstract

Purpose: To present the refractive outcomes, comparative defocus curves, proposed mechanisms of action, and methods to mitigate IOL-specific complications of the Crystalens intraocular lens.

Methods: Literature review.

Results: Distance-corrected intermediate vision with Crystalens and its toric version, Trulign, average 20/23 and distance-corrected near at 20/40, which are favorable outcomes compared with non-presbyopia-correcting IOLs. Evidence supporting accommodation as the principal mechanism of action of Crystalens is limited, and it may be better classified as an extended depth of focus IOL. The IOL provides high levels of contrast sensitivity and low incidence of photic phenomenon. The occurrence of Z-syndrome, consequent to capsular contraction, causing asymmetric flexing of the haptic-optic junctions, is reviewed along with methods to mitigate and manage this potential complication.

Conclusions: Crystalens is an aberration-free IOL that provides extended depth of focus and is immune to the optical effects of IOL decentration. It provides a high contrast retinal image, does not split light to multiple foci, has low incidence of photic phenomenon, and is particularly useful in patients with mild macular pathology, glaucoma, or post-refractive surgery where diffractive optics can be problematic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pepose JS, Wang D, Altmann GE. Comparison of through-focus image sharpness across five presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154:20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.01.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cumming JS, Colvard DM, Dell SJ, et al. Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens. Results of the US Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Takakura A, Iyer P, Adams JR, Pepin SM. Functional assessment of accommodating intraocular lenses versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: Metaanalysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.09.039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marchini G, Pedrotti E, Sartori P, Tosi R. Ultrasound biomicroscopic changes during accommodation in eyes with accommodating intraocular lenses: Pilot study and hypothesis for the mechanism of accommodation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.04.053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marcos S, Ortiz S, Pérez-Merino P, Birkenfeld J, Durán S, Jiménez-Alfaro I. Three-dimensional evaluation of accommodating intraocular lens shift and alignment in vivo. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.06.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rabbetts RB. Bennett and Rabbetts’ clinical visual optics. In: Bennett and Rabbetts’ clinical visual optics. London: Butterworth; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pérez-Merino P, Birkenfeld J, Dorronsoro C, et al. Aberrometry in patients implanted with accommodative intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157:1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.02.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pepose JS, Hayashida J, Hovanesian J, et al. Safety and effectiveness of a new toric presbyopia-correcting posterior chamber silicone intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.05.043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pepose JS, Qazi MA, Davies J, et al. Visual performance of patients with bilateral vs combination Crystalens, ReZoom, and ReSTOR intraocular lens implants. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(3):347–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2007.05.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pepose JS, Qazi MA, Chu R, Stahl J. A prospective randomized clinical evaluation of 3 presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.06.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Packer M, Chu YR, Waltz KL, et al. Evaluation of the aspheric tecnis multifocal intraocular lens: one-year results from the first cohort of the food and drug administration clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149(4):577–584.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.10.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hayashi K, Yoshida M, ichi MS, Hayashi H. Comparison of visual function between phakic eyes and pseudophakic eyes with a monofocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.07.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. MacRae S, Holladay JT, Glasser A, et al. Special Report: American Academy of Ophthalmology Task Force Consensus Statement for Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.09.039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Glasser A, Hilmantel G, Calogero D, et al. Special Report: American Academy of Ophthalmology Task Force Recommendations for Test Methods to Assess Accommodation Produced by Intraocular Lenses. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(1):134–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.09.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pepose JS, Burke J, Qazi MA. Accommodating intraocular lenses. Asia-Pac J Ophthalmol. 2017;6(4):350–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethical Requirements

Mujtaba Qazi and Caleb Morris have no conflicts of interest. Jay Pepose is a consultant for AcuFocus, Bausch + Lomb, and Johnson and Johnson Vision.

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay S. Pepose .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Morris, C., Qazi, M.A., Pepose, J.S. (2019). Accommodative Intraocular Lenses: Crystalens. In: Alió, J., Pikkel, J. (eds) Multifocal Intraocular Lenses. Essentials in Ophthalmology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21282-7_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21282-7_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21281-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21282-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics