Skip to main content

Grafting in Nasal Reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
All Around the Nose

Abstract

Nasal reconstruction after tissue loss requires understanding of multiple complex surgical techniques and principles aimed at restoring anatomic integrity, function, and aesthetics of the nose. The reconstruction form and function of the nose are generally challenging when compared to other regions of the face. The outer skin and soft tissue envelope the cartilaginous and bony structure, and the mucosal lining should be considered in the reconstruction of each defect. This chapter is mainly focused on graft materials that are commonly used for nasal reconstruction. A graft is any type of tissue that is harvested from a donor site and transferred to a recipient site without carrying its own blood supply. After transplantation, a newly formed blood supply (angiogenesis) grows toward the graft. Grafts are divided into three categories according to their sources: (1) autografts, (2) homografts, and (3) xenografts. Autografts, or autogenous grafts, designate tissues that are harvested from a site and transplanted on other site of the same patient. Skin, cartilage, fascia, fat, and bone grafts can be used for the reconstruction of various nasal defects or deformities. Indeed, autogenous grafts are the gold standard graft materials for nasal reconstruction due to low rates of rejection, infection, and extrusion. If the donor and recipient are the same species but a different host, the graft is called as homograft. Homograft is divided into two groups: (1) isograft (donor and recipient have the same genetic material as in monozygotic twins) and (2) allograft (the tissue is transferred between genetically nonidentical members of same species). Xenografts are tissue that is harvested from one species and transplanted into another species. Xenografts are generally indicated for closure of post-Mohs surgery in massive wounds, and act as biological dressings to allow for wound granulation and epithelialization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sherris AD, Larrabee WF. Principles of Facial Reconstruction: A Subunit Approach to Cutaneous Repair. New York: Thieme; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Otley CC, Sherris DA. Spectrum of cartilage grafting in cutaneous reconstructive surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;39(6):982–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Toriumi DM. Autogenous grafts are worth the extra time. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(4):562–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gottlieb LJ, Krieger LM. From the reconstructive ladder to the reconstructive elevator. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93(7):1503–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Andreassi A, et al. Classification and pathophysiology of skin grafts. Clin Dermatol. 2005;23(4):332–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ibrahim AM, et al. Common patterns of reconstruction for Mohs defects in the head and neck. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(1):87–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Greenwood J, et al. Real-time demonstration of split skin graft inosculation and integra dermal matrix neovascularization using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Eplasty. 2009;9:e33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rohrich RJ, et al. Nasal reconstruction--beyond aesthetic subunits: a 15-year review of 1334 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(6):1405–16; discussion 1417-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lutz ME. Effective use of the glabella skin as a donor site for nasal tip grafts. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(1):101–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Konofaos P, et al. Nasal Reconstruction: A Simplified Approach Based on 419 Operated Cases. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2015;39(1):91–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Woodard CR, Park SS. Reconstruction of nasal defects 1.5 cm or smaller. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011;13(2):97–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park SS. Nasal reconstruction in the 21st century--a contemporary review. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;1(1):1–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Stucker FJ Jr, Shaw GY. The perichondrial cutaneous graft. A 12-year clinical experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118(3):287–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Love CW, et al. Perichondrial cutaneous grafts for reconstruction of skin cancer excision defects. Dermatol Surg. 1995;21(3):219–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hubbard TJ. Leave the fat, skip the bolster: thinking outside the box in lower third nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(6):1427–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Haack S, Gubisch W. Reconstruction of the septum with an autogenous double-layered conchal L-strut. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2014;38(5):912–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jang YJ, et al. Combined use of crushed cartilage and processed fascia lata for dorsal augmentation in rhinoplasty for Asians. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(6):1088–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gassner HG. Structural grafts and suture techniques in functional and aesthetic rhinoplasty. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;9:Doc01.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Allcroft RA, Friedman CD, Quatela VC. Cartilage grafts for head and neck augmentation and reconstruction. Autografts and homografts. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 1994;27(1):69–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sherris DA, Oriel BS. Human acellular dermal matrix grafts for rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;31(7 Suppl):95S–100S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Daniel RK. Diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty surgery: current techniques and applications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(6):1883–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sherris DA, Kern EB. The versatile autogenous rib graft in septorhinoplasty. Am J Rhinol. 1998;12(3):221–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee M, Inman J, Ducic Y. Central segment harvest of costal cartilage in rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(10):2155–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Foulad A, et al. Stabilization of costal cartilage graft warping using infrared laser irradiation in a porcine model. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2010;12(6):405–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Park SW, et al. Various applications of deep temporal fascia in rhinoplasty. Yonsei Med J. 2015;56(1):167–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Calvert J, Kwon E. Techniques for diced cartilage with deep temporalis fascia graft. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2015;23(1):73–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brenner KA, et al. Survival of diced cartilage grafts: an experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(1):105–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Virkkula P, Makitie AA, Vento SI. Surgical outcome and complications of nasal septal perforation repair with temporal fascia and periosteal grafts. Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat. 2015;8:7–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Baptista C, et al. Correction of sequelae of rhinoplasty by lipofilling. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(6):805–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Xing L, et al. Ophthalmic artery occlusion secondary to fat emboli after cosmetic nasal injection of autologous fat. Retina. 2012;32(10):2175–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sathe N, et al. Fixation of nasal bone grafts with interosseous wire: our technique. J Laryngol Otol. 2011;125(2):199–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sadooghi M, Kouhi A. Mastoid bone as a new graft material in rhinoplasty. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23(6):e42–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gurlek A, et al. The use of lower turbinate bone grafts in the treatment of saddle nose deformities. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2002;26(6):407–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Christophel JJ, Hilger PA. Osseocartilaginous rib graft rhinoplasty: a stable, predictable technique for major dorsal reconstruction. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011;13(2):78–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zins JE, Whitaker LA. Membranous versus endochondral bone: implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72(6):778–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Thomassin JM, Paris J, Richard-Vitton T. Management and aesthetic results of support grafts in saddle nose surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2001;25(5):332–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Movahed R, et al. Application of cranial bone grafts for reconstruction of maxillofacial deformities. Proc. Bayl Univ Med Cent. 2013;26(3):252–5.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Strong EB, Moulthrop T. Calvarial bone graft harvest: a new technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123(5):547–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Qi L, et al. Results of 10-year follow-up of the iliac donor site of graft patients. J Int Med Res. 2014;42(6):1348–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hodgkinson DJ. The olecranon bone graft for nasal augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg. 1992;16(2):129–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hodgkinson DJ. The Eurasian nose: aesthetic principles and techniques for augmentation of the asian nose with autogenous grafting. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2007;31(1):28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yanaga H, Imai K, Yanaga K. Generative surgery of cultured autologous auricular chondrocytes for nasal augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2009;33(6):795–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Fulco I, et al. Engineered autologous cartilage tissue for nasal reconstruction after tumour resection: an observational first-in-human trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9940):337–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Macchiarini P, et al. Clinical transplantation of a tissue-engineered airway. Lancet. 2008;372(9655):2023–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Shingyochi Y, Orbay H, Mizuno H. Adipose-derived stem cells for wound repair and regeneration. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2015;15(9):1285–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hanson SE, Bentz ML, Hematti P. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for nonhealing cutaneous wounds. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(2):510–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Akita S, et al. Noncultured autologous adipose-derived stem cells therapy for chronic radiation injury. Stem Cells Int. 2010;2010:p. 532704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Jo DI, et al. Coverage of skin defects without skin grafts using adipose-derived stem cells. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2013;37(5):1041–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Altman AM, et al. IFATS collection: Human adipose-derived stem cells seeded on a silk fibroin-chitosan scaffold enhance wound repair in a murine soft tissue injury model. Stem Cells. 2009;27(1):250–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Romo T 3rd, Sclafani AP, Sabini P. Reconstruction of the major saddle nose deformity using composite allo-implants. Facial Plast Surg. 1998;14(2):151–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ayshford CA, et al. Endoscopic repair of nasal septal perforation with acellular human dermal allograft and an inferior turbinate flap. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003;28(1):29–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Carucci JA, Kolenik SA 3rd, Leffell DJ. Human cadaveric allograft for repair of nasal defects after extirpation of Basal cell carcinoma by Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(4):340–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Gryskiewicz JM. Dorsal Augmentation with AlloDerm. Semin Plast Surg. 2008;22(2):90–103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Gryskiewicz JM. Waste not, want not: the use of AlloDerm in secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(7):1999–2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gryskiewicz JM, Rohrich RJ, Reagan BJ. The use of alloderm for the correction of nasal contour deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(2):561–70. discussion 571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kridel RW, et al. Long-term use and follow-up of irradiated homologous costal cartilage grafts in the nose. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(6):378–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Burke AJ, Wang TD, Cook TA. Irradiated homograft rib cartilage in facial reconstruction. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6(5):334–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Donald PJ, et al. The effects of irradiation dose on the stiffness of cartilage grafts. Ann Plast Surg. 1996;36(3):297–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Adams WP Jr, et al. The rate of warping in irradiated and nonirradiated homograft rib cartilage: a controlled comparison and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103(1):265–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Raimer DW, et al. Porcine xenograft biosynthetic wound dressings for the management of postoperative Mohs wounds. Dermatol Online J. 2011;17(9):1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Rogge MN, et al. Bovine Collagen Xenograft Repair of Extensive Surgical Scalp Wounds With Exposed Calvarium in the Elderly: Increased Rates of Wound Healing. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(7):794–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ferril GR, Wudel JM, Winkler AA. Management of complications from alloplastic implants in rhinoplasty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;21(4):372–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Homicz MR, Watson D. Review of injectable materials for soft tissue augmentation. Facial Plast Surg. 2004;20(1):21–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Requena L, et al. Adverse reactions to injectable soft tissue fillers. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64(1):1–34. quiz 35-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Elson ML. Injectable collagen and autoimmune disease. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1993;19(2):165–8. discussion 170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sclafani AP, et al. Homologous collagen dispersion (dermalogen) as a dermal filler: persistence and histology compared with bovine collagen. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49(2):181–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Moody BR, Sengelmann RD. Self-limited adverse reaction to human-derived collagen injectable product. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26(10):936–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Okada S, et al. Eosinophilic granulomatous reaction after intradermal injection of hyaluronic acid. Acta Derm Venereol. 2008;88(1):69–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Salles AG, et al. Complications after polymethylmethacrylate injections: report of 32 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(5):1811–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uzdan Uz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Uz, U., Eskiizmir, G., Sherris, D. (2020). Grafting in Nasal Reconstruction. In: Cingi, C., Bayar Muluk, N. (eds) All Around the Nose. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21217-9_82

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21217-9_82

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21216-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21217-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics