Skip to main content

Attitudes to Work

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Work in the Future
  • 1145 Accesses

Abstract

Work has traditionally been defined as either instrumental (to meet needs) or expressive (as a creative activity). In the twentieth century it has also, through the welfarist model, been seen as a route to human flourishing. Workers in France show paradoxical attitudes, in that they attach high importance to work, yet devote less time to it and express strong dissatisfaction with pay and career prospects, and feel a high level of insecurity about retaining their jobs. French employment and social policies help to explain this paradox, including regulation of working time, rejection of the ‘working poor’ social model and the high employment/high inequality economic model, and distrustful labour relations. There are three responses to this paradox: voice, loyalty or exit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anand, P., Durand, M., & Heckman, J. (2011). Editorial: The Measurement of Progress—Some Achievements and Challenges. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 174, 851–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artus, P. (2017). Flash Economics (daily publication). Paris: Natixis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, M., & Frey, B. (2008). Being Independent is a Great Thing: Subjective Evaluations of Self-employment and Hierarchy. Economica, 75, 362–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., Sadun, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2012). The Organization of Firms Across Countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(4), 1663–1705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheuvreux, M. & Darmaillacq, C. (2014). Unionisation in France: paradoxes, challenges and outlook. TRESOR-ECONOMICS 129, 1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. Blackwell Publishing.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe-Rexecode, 2016. La durée effective annuelle du travail en France et en Europe. Document de travail n°59, Paris : Coe-Rexecode.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1985). Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (2004). The Economics of Innocent Fraud: Truth For Our Time. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, H., Méda, D., & Senik, C. (2006). La place du travail dans les identités. Economie et Statistique, 393–394, 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1986). The New Obscurity: The Crisis of the Welfare State and the Exhaustion of Utopian Energies. Philosophy and Social Criticism 11(2), 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • INSEE. (2015). Emploi et revenu des indépendants. Paris: INSEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • INSEE. (2017). Emploi, chômage, revenus du travail. Paris : INSEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • INSEE. (2018). Tableaux de l’économie française. Paris : INSEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamarche, P., & Romani, M. (2015). Le patrimoine des indépendants. In Emploi et revenu des indépendants. Paris: INSEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Méda, D., & Vendramin, P. (2017). Reinventing Work in Europe. Value, Generations and Labour. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Menger, P.-M. (2002). Portrait de l’artiste en travailleur. Métamorphoses du capitalisme. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, P.-M. (2014). The Economics of Creativity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K., & Topel, R. (2016). Human Capital Investment, Inequality, and Economic Growth. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(2, Pt. 2), S99–S127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). How’s Life? 2015: Measuring Well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017). OECD Economic Surveys: France 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (1986). The Theory of Equalizing Differences. In O. Ashenfelter & R. Layard (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (2008). The Craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Strahan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supiot, A., et al. (2001). Beyond Employment. Changes in Work and the Future of Labour Law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1989). The Sources of the Self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdugo, G. (2014). The Great Compression of the French Wage Structure, 1969–2008. Labour Economics, 28, 131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre-Michel Menger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Menger, PM. (2020). Attitudes to Work. In: Skidelsky, R., Craig, N. (eds) Work in the Future. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21134-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21134-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21133-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21134-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics