Skip to main content

The Standing Position: Its Principles and Spinopelvic Relations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Spinal Anatomy
  • 2287 Accesses

Abstract

Permanent erect standing position is the main anatomical feature that differentiates humans from all animals. To achieve this situation, a specific combination between shape and positioning of both pelvis and spine is necessary. The pelvis is generally in a retroverted position and the spine presents successive curvatures: lordosis in the lumbar area and kyphosis in the thoracic area. This underlines the importance of the reciprocal anatomy in the sagittal plan of the sacral endplate and the bi-femoral axis. Described by Duval-Beaupère, the Pelvic Incidence (PI) is the main pelvic shape parameter that measures this relation. PI is directly linked with two positional parameters, Pelvis Tilt (PT) and Sacral Slope (SS) by the relation: PI = PT + SS. In a normal population PI has a great variability from 35° to 85° and beyond these limits, the functional anatomy is always pathological.

Linked with the sacral endplate, there is a direct relation between the spine and the pelvis, and due to the strong relation between PI and SS, the pelvis shape plays a big role in spinal curves’ orientation. Based on a functional segmentation limiting the lordosis from the sacral endplate to the inflection point where lordosis curve transitions in kyphosis, Roussouly has described four types of lordosis according to SS: types 1 and 2 for small SS (<35°), type 3 for average values (35° < SS < 45°), and type 4 for high values (SS > 45°). Due to the relation between PI and SS, one may encounter Types 1 and 2 with small PI and 3 and 4 with high PI.

The global analysis of the sagittal balance may be evaluated by C7 positioning. Different angles and distance were proposed to assess C7 versus pelvis position. Barrey proposed a ratio of distances that allows positioning the C7 plumb line regarding the femoral heads and the sacrum.

When the system is no longer balanced, there are two main compensation mechanisms to maintain an unbalanced but possible standing position: pelvis retroversion and spinal extension. Due to the variable spinal shapes associated with PI variability, the forces induced by the gravity on the functional vertebral unit may have variable degenerative expressions. This specific degenerative evolution associated with variable compensation mechanisms will generate the pathological shape that one may expect based on the original normal shape. That may help to understand the strategy of treatment targeting restoration of a balanced shape according to PI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. During J, Goudfrooij H, Keessen W, Beeker TW, Crowe A. Towards standards for posture. Postural characteristics of the lower back system in normal and pathologic conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1985;10:837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J, Marty C. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J. 1998;7:99103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Guigui P, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(22):E119398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lafage V, Schwab F, Skalli W, Hawkinson N, Gagey PM, Ondra S, Farcy JP. Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:15728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stagnara P, De Mauroy JC, Dran G, Gonon G, Costanzo G, Dimnet J, Pasquet A, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982;7(4):33542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, Labelle H. Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(1):407.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, et al. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2003;89(7):6329. (in French).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL. Sagittal parameters of the spine: biomechanical approach. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(Suppl. 5):57885.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Noseda O, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(11):E32025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barrey C, Roussouly P, Perrin G, et al. Sagittal balance disorders in severe degenerative spine. Can we identify the compensatory mechanisms? Eur Spine J. 2011;20(Suppl. 5):62633.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Blondel B, Schwab F, Ungar B, Smith J, Bridwell K, Glassman S, Shaffrey C, Farcy JP, Lafage V. Impact of magnitude and percentage of global sagittal plane correction on health-related quality of life at 2-years follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(2):3418; discussion 348. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31825d20c0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL. Biomechanical analysis of the spinopelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(Suppl 5):60918.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Roussouly .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roussouly, P. (2020). The Standing Position: Its Principles and Spinopelvic Relations. In: Vital, J., Cawley, D. (eds) Spinal Anatomy . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20925-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20925-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20924-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20925-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics