Skip to main content

Lumbar Total Disc Replacement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Resident's Guide to Spine Surgery
  • 1026 Accesses

Abstract

Lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) is a method to treat degenerative disc disease in the lumbar spine in skeletally mature patients without high-grade spondylolisthesis who have failed conservative treatment. Although decompression and fusion for degenerative disc disease is considered the gold standard, potential drawbacks of arthrodesis include pseudarthrosis and adjacent segment disease. The purpose of TDR is to restore and maintain motion segment mobility which is intended to prevent adjacent segment disease and relieve pain. This chapter discusses the background, indications/contraindications, technique including preparation and positioning, approach, and implant placement, along with postoperative care, and outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lumbar total disk arthroplasty Michael F. Duffy and Jack E. Zigler operative techniques: Spine Surgery, PRO. 42:371–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty Richard D. Guyer and Ernesto Otero-Lopez Benzel’s spine surgery, 184:1591–6.e1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. van den Eerenbeemt, Karin D, et al. Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(8):1262–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Disc Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Degenerative Disorders of the Lumbar Spine David T. Anderson and Adam L. Shimer. Arthritis and Arthroplasty: The Spine, Chapter 47:357–64.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Hayes V, et al. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities. Spine. 2006;31:S152–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bendo JA, Quirno M, Errico T, et al. A comparison of two retroperitoneal surgical approaches for total disc arthroplasty of the lumbar spine. Spine. 2008;33:205–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sasso RC, Kenneth Burkus J, LeHuec J-C. Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure. Spine. 2003;28(10):1023–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Failed Total Disc Arthroplasty Andrew K. Simpson and Jack E. Zigler Rothman-Simeone and Herkowitz’s The Spine, Chapter 104:1889–901.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Sariali e-H, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charité artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:353–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. David T. Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine. 2007;32:661–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Siepe CJ, Heider F, Wiechert K, et al. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up. Spine J. 2014;14:1417–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV, et al. The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine. 2005;30:2230–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE Artificial Disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine. 2005;30:1565–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Banco RJ, et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE Artificial Disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Spine J. 2009;9:374–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Regan JJ, McAfee PC, Blumenthal SL, et al. Evaluation of surgical volume and the early experience with lumbar total disc replacement as part of the investigational device exemption study of the Charite Artificial Disc. Spine. 2006;31:2270–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Weinreb, J.H. (2020). Lumbar Total Disc Replacement. In: O'Brien, J., Kalantar, S., Drazin, D., Sandhu, F. (eds) The Resident's Guide to Spine Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20847-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20847-9_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20846-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20847-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics