Skip to main content

Restraint and Seclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Intellectual Disabilities

Abstract

For the purposes of this discussion, restraint is defined as physically holding or securing an individual, either for a brief time period to interrupt severe problem behavior or for an extended period of time using physical holds or mechanical devices to prevent dangerous behavior (Vollmer et al., The Behavior Analyst, 34:103–110, 2011). Seclusion is defined as isolating an individual from others to interrupt problem behavior that places others at risk of harm (Vollmer et al.). Historically, restraint and seclusion were used as methods to either protect individuals from harming themselves or others, or in some cases to punish harmful behavior (Metzner et al., Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 35, 417–425, 2007). In more recent times, restraint and seclusion are usually viewed primarily as protective measures designed to keep an individual from doing harm to self or others. In this chapter we will provide some historical perspective on the use of restraint and seclusion, sample some position statements from various professional organizations that seem to confirm this ethical stance, and examine some state regulations. Finally, we will outline best practices as gleaned from the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Academy of Pediatrics. (1997). The use of physical restraint interventions for children and adolescents in the acute care setting. Elk Grove Village, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association, American Psychiatric Nurses Association, National Association of Psychiatric Health Systems. (2003). Learning from each other: Success stories and ideas for reducing restraint/seclusion in behavioral health.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Nurses Association. (2000; Updated 2014). APNA position statement on the use of seclusion and restraint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Pub. L. 101-336. 26 July 1990. 104 Stat. 328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Professional Behavior Analysts. (2010). Position statement on the use of restraint and seclusion as interventions for dangerous and destructive behaviors: Supporting research and practice guidelines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autism National Committee. (1999). Position on restraints.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2016). How safe is the schoolhouse: An analysis of state seclusion and restraint laws and policies?

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion, M. K. (2007). Commentary: Seclusion and restraint in corrections—A time for change. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 35(4), 426–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civic Impulse. (2015a). H.R. 927 – 114th Congress: Keeping All Students Safe Act. Retrieved from https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/114/hr927

  • Civic Impulse. (2015b). S. 1177 – 114th Congress: Every Student Succeeds Act. Retrieved from https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/114/s1177

  • Colaizzi, J. (2005). Seclusion & restraint: A historical perspective. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 43(2), 31–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colorado State Board of Education. (2009). Code of Colorado Regulations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health & Human Services. (2008). CMS Manual System.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, J. M., Vollmer, T. R., Yakich, T. M., & Van Camp, C. (2013). Effects of a reduced time-out interval on compliance with the time-out instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46(2), 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. A. (1994). Restraint and seclusion: a review of the literature. The American Journal of Psychology, 151(11), 1584–1591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J., & Sugai, G. (2013). Recent changes in state policies and legislation regarding restraint or seclusion. Exceptional Children, 79(4), 427–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, T. A., & Baker, J. N. (2017). Analysis of restraint and seclusion legislation and policy across states: Adherence to recommended principles. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 28(1), 23–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2014). Code of Massachusetts Regulations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, K. J. (2017). Physical restraint: A Historical review and current practice. Psychiatric Annals, 47(1), 52–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzner, J. L., Tardiff, K., Lion, J., Reid, W. H., Recupero, P. R., Schetky, D. H., … Janofsky, J. S. (2007). Resource document on the use of restraint and seclusion in correctional mental health care. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 35(4), 417–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, J., & Carson, R. (2008). Sudden death during restraint: do some positions affect lung function? Medicine, Science and the Law, 48(2), 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pudelski, S. (2012). Keeping Schools Safe: How seclusion and restraint protects students and school personnel. Retrieved from https://www.aasa.org/uploadedFiles/Policy_and_Advocacy/AASA-July-2012-Keeping-Schools-Safe.pdf

  • Recupero, P. R., Price, M., Garvey, K. A., Daly, B., & Xavier, S. L. (2011). Restraint and seclusion in psychiatric treatment settings: Regulation, case law, and risk management. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 39, 465–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhode Island Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2002). Board of regents for elementary and secondary education physical restraint regulations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. B., Peterson, R. L., Tetreault, G., & Van Der Hagan, E. (2008). Reducing the use of seclusion and restraint in a day school program. In M. A. Nunno, D. M. Day, & L. B. Bullard (Eds.), For our own safety: Examining the safety of high- 141 risk interventions for children and young people (pp. 201–215). Arlington, VA: Child Welfare League of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sailas, E. E. S., & Fenton, M. (2000). Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illnesses. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuermann, B., Peterson, R., Ryan, J. B., & Billingsley, G. (2015). Professional practice and ethical issues related to physical restraint and seclusion in schools. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 27, 86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinert, T., Lepping, P., Bernhardsgrütter, R., Conca, A., Hatling, T., Janssen, W., … Whittington, R. (2010). Incidence of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric hospitals: a literature review and survey of international trends. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45(9), 889–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturmey, P. (2009). Restraint, seclusion and PRN medication in english services for people with learning disabilities administered by the national health service: An analysis of the 2007 national audit survey. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22(2), 140–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Joint Commission. (2017). Joint Commission Accreditation Standards.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2012). Restraint and seclusion: Resource document.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2016). Dear colleague letter.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Montana compilation school discipline laws and regulation.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights. (2016). 2013–2014 Civil Rights Data Collection: A First Look.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2015). Special report: Disabilities among prison and jail inmates, 2011–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2009). Seclusions and restraints: Selected cases of death and abuse at public and private schools and treatment centers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, T. R., Hagopian, L. P., Bailey, J. S., Dorsey, M. F., Hanley, G. P., Lennox, D., … Spreat, S. (2011). The Association for Behavior Analysis International Position Statement on Restraint and Seclusion. The Behavior Analyst, 34(1), 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, E.M., Altimari, D, Blint, D.F., & Megan, K. Deadly restraint: a nationwide pattern of death. a Hartford Courant investigative report. Hartford Courant, October 11, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy R. Vollmer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vollmer, T.R., Deshais, M.A., Pizarro, E.M. (2019). Restraint and Seclusion. In: Matson, J.L. (eds) Handbook of Intellectual Disabilities. Autism and Child Psychopathology Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20843-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics