Abstract
Bunce discusses the impact of students being defined as ‘consumers’ of their higher education. The chapter first considers when and why students came to be defined as consumers in England and Wales, UK, and then reflects upon the advantages and disadvantages associated with treating students as consumers of their education. This discussion includes the perspectives of both students and academic staff, and reviews empirical evidence about the effects of students themselves identifying as consumers on their approaches to learning and academic performance. The chapter concludes with a summary of the challenges for universities when listening to the student as consumer voice and emphasises the importance of striking a balance between making students feel heard, while resisting the notion that ‘the customer is always right’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 133–149.
Boyd, C. (2018). A beginner’s guide to the Office for Students. Retrieved from https://wonkhe.com/blogs/a-beginners-guide-to-the-office-for-students/.
Bunce, L., Baird, A., & Jones, S. E. (2017). The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 1958–1978.
Bunce, L., & Bennett, M. (in press). A degree of studying? Approaches to learning and academic performance among student ‘consumers’. Active Learning in Higher Education.
Cardoso, S., Carvalho, T., & Santiago, R. (2011). From students to consumers: Reflections on the marketisation of Portuguese higher education. European Journal of Education, 46(2), 271–284.
Delucchi, M., & Korgen, K. (2002). “We’re the customer—We pay the tuition”: Student consumerism among undergraduate sociology majors. Teaching Sociology, 30(1), 100–107.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2003). The future of higher education. Norwich: HMSO.
Diseth, Å., & Martinsen, Ø. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23(2), 195–207.
Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K., & Ferguson, J. (2004). The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(8), 1907–1920.
Ek, A. C., Ideland, M., Jönsson, S., & Malmberg, C. (2013). The tension between marketisation and academisation in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1305–1318.
Eley, M. G. (1992). Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students. Higher Education, 23, 231–254.
Espinoza, J. (2015, November 24). University students in England ‘pay the highest tuition fees in the world’. The Telegraph. Retrieved from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/universityeducation/12013303/University-students-in-England-pay-the-highest-tuition-fees-in-the-world.html.
Finney, T., & Finney, R. (2010). Are students their universities’ customers? An exploratory study. Education and Training, 52(4), 276–291.
Greatrix, P. (2011). University isn’t just a business—And the student isn’t always right. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/higher-education-network-blog/2011/mar/14/students-as-consumers.
Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). (2011). National Student Survey. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/learning/nss/.
Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). (2017). What do graduates do and earn? Starting salaries. Retrieved from https://www.thecompleteuniversityguide.co.uk/careers/what-do-graduates-do-and-earn/starting-salaries-%E2%80%93-do-graduates-earn-more/.
Jones-Devitt, S., & Samiei, C. (2010). From Accrington Stanley to academia? The use of league tables and student surveys to determine ‘quality’ in higher education. In M. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & E. Nixon (Eds.), The marketisation of higher education (pp. 86–100). Oxon: Routledge.
King, N., & Bunce, L. (under review). A degree of consumerism? Academics’ perceptions of motivation in undergraduate student ‘consumers’. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Koris, R., & Nokelainen, P. (2015). The student-customer orientation questionnaire (SCOQ): Application of customer metaphor to higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(1), 115–138.
Koris, R., Örtenblad, A., Kerem, K., & Ojala, T. (2015). Student-customer orientation at a higher education institution: The perspective of undergraduate business students. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 25(1), 29–44.
Lomas, L. (2007). Are students consumers? Perceptions of academic staff. Quality in Higher Education, 13(1), 31–44.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 36–55). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
McMahon, W. W. (2009). Higher learning, greater good: The private and social benefits of higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Molesworth, M., Nixon, E., & Scullion, R. (2009). Having, being and higher education: The marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 277–287.
Naidoo, R., & Jamieson, I. (2005). Empowering participants or corroding learning? Towards a research agenda on the impact of student consumerism in higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 267–281.
National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (NCIHE). (1997). Higher education in the learning society. London: Department for Education.
Newman, J. H. (1959). The idea of a university. New York: Image Books (Original 1852).
Pitman, T. (2000). Perceptions of academics and students as customers: A survey of administrative staff in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(2), 165–175.
Saunders, D. B. (2014). They do not buy it: Exploring the extent to which entering first-year students view themselves as customers. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 25, 5–28.
Shumar, W. (1997). College for sale: A critique of the commodification of higher education. London: Falmer Press.
Todd, S., Barnoff, L., Moffatt, K., Panitch, M., Parada, H., & Strumm, B. (2017). A social work re-reading of students as consumers. Social Work Education, 36(5), 542–556.
Tomlinson, M. (2014). Exploring the impacts of policy changes on student approaches and attitudes to learning in contemporary higher education: Implications for student learning engagement. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/exploring_the_impact_of_policy_changes_student_experience.pdf/.
Tomlinson, M. (2017). Student perceptions of themselves as ‘consumers’ of higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(4), 450–467.
White, N. R. (2007). ‘The customer is always right?’: Student discourse about higher education in Australia. Higher Education, 54(4), 593–604.
Williams, J. (2011). Constructing consumption: What media representations reveal about today’s students. In M. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & E. Nixon (Eds.), The marketisation of higher education (pp. 170–182). Oxon: Routledge.
Williams, J. (2013). Consuming higher education: Why learning can’t be bought. London: Bloomsbury.
Woodall, T., Hiller, A., & Resnick, S. (2014). Making sense of higher education: Students as consumers and the value of the university experience. Studies in Higher Education, 39(1), 48–67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bunce, L. (2019). The Voice of the Student as a ‘Consumer’. In: Lygo-Baker, S., Kinchin, I., Winstone, N. (eds) Engaging Student Voices in Higher Education . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20824-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20824-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20823-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20824-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)