Abstract
Defending democracy against its adversaries when the challenges to its statehood have endured for over two decades has placed the Republic of Moldova in a unique context of incomplete secession. With the persistence of parallel claims to authority in the unrecognised state of Transnistria, different processes of electoral legitimisation have taken place in the two entities, often leading to escalation. These are addressed in this essay to reveal the way in which the metropolitan and de facto state have sought to implement distinctive policies towards counter-secession and secession respectively, argueing that this can only be understood if one moves beyond a simple democracy/autocracy dichotomy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Albulescu, A.M. (2019). Between Democracy and Autocracy: Towards an Understanding of the Nature of Incomplete Secession, the Case of Moldova-Transnistria. In: Augusteijn, J., Hijzen, C., de Vries, M. (eds) Historical Perspectives on Democracies and their Adversaries. Palgrave Studies in Political History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20123-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20123-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20122-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20123-4
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)